Working memory of young school-age learners acquiring L2 English morphology: An experimental exploratory lab study with structured input intervention

Q1 Arts and Humanities
Dietmar Roehm , Tanja Angelovska
{"title":"Working memory of young school-age learners acquiring L2 English morphology: An experimental exploratory lab study with structured input intervention","authors":"Dietmar Roehm ,&nbsp;Tanja Angelovska","doi":"10.1016/j.amper.2024.100192","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The aim of this pre-/posttest design lab case study is to find possible interactions between working memory (WM) effects and the effectiveness of structured input among 10-11-year-olds with first language (L1) German children. The target feature is the simple English past tense. The WM capacity was assessed via three span tasks: listening (LST), reading (RST), and a digit span task (DST). Second language (L2) learners' WM scores for all three span tasks were included as continuous predictors in the mixed model analysis. Assessment entailed sentence-level interpretation tasks yielding accuracy scores with reaction times, and a gap-filling production task with accuracy scores. Regarding interpretation, results varied. L2 learners with high DST scores outperformed learners with low DST scores in terms of accuracy. A mixed model analysis including reaction times did not improve the model's fit. Regarding production, the WM did not prove to be a predictor for the accuracy effects. However, L2 learners with early age of onset English (AOE) showed significant improvement over time and L2 learners with late AOE showed no effect at all. We conclude that instruction with structured input is effective regardless of the WM score, and its effects are retained over a 3 weeks' delayed period.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":35076,"journal":{"name":"Ampersand","volume":"13 ","pages":"Article 100192"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2215039024000304/pdfft?md5=5b3ed7f037f65965b2d42dce57ef8973&pid=1-s2.0-S2215039024000304-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ampersand","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2215039024000304","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of this pre-/posttest design lab case study is to find possible interactions between working memory (WM) effects and the effectiveness of structured input among 10-11-year-olds with first language (L1) German children. The target feature is the simple English past tense. The WM capacity was assessed via three span tasks: listening (LST), reading (RST), and a digit span task (DST). Second language (L2) learners' WM scores for all three span tasks were included as continuous predictors in the mixed model analysis. Assessment entailed sentence-level interpretation tasks yielding accuracy scores with reaction times, and a gap-filling production task with accuracy scores. Regarding interpretation, results varied. L2 learners with high DST scores outperformed learners with low DST scores in terms of accuracy. A mixed model analysis including reaction times did not improve the model's fit. Regarding production, the WM did not prove to be a predictor for the accuracy effects. However, L2 learners with early age of onset English (AOE) showed significant improvement over time and L2 learners with late AOE showed no effect at all. We conclude that instruction with structured input is effective regardless of the WM score, and its effects are retained over a 3 weeks' delayed period.
学龄儿童学习 L2 英语词法时的工作记忆:结构化输入干预的实验探索性研究
这项前测/后测设计实验室案例研究的目的是在 10-11 岁的德语儿童中寻找工作记忆(WM)效应与结构化输入有效性之间可能存在的相互作用。目标特征是简单英语过去式。WM能力通过三种跨度任务进行评估:听力(LST)、阅读(RST)和数字跨度任务(DST)。在混合模型分析中,第二语言(L2)学习者在所有三个跨度任务中的 WM 分数都被列为连续预测因子。评估包括句子层面的口译任务,其准确性得分与反应时间相关;以及填空制作任务,其准确性得分与反应时间相关。在口译方面,结果各不相同。在准确性方面,DST 分数高的 L2 学习者优于 DST 分数低的学习者。包括反应时间在内的混合模型分析并没有提高模型的拟合度。在生产方面,WM 并未被证明是准确性效应的预测因素。然而,随着时间的推移,英语启蒙年龄(AOE)较早的 L2 学习者的英语水平有了显著提高,而英语启蒙年龄较晚的 L2 学习者的英语水平则没有任何提高。我们的结论是,无论 WM 分数如何,结构化输入教学都是有效的,而且其效果会在 3 周的延迟期内保持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ampersand
Ampersand Arts and Humanities-Language and Linguistics
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信