Temporary halo fixation and radiotherapy as alternative to long-construct spondylodesis in patients with multiple unstable cervical metastases

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
E.H. Huele , J.M. van der Velden , H.M. Verkooijen , N. Kasperts , J.J. Verlaan
{"title":"Temporary halo fixation and radiotherapy as alternative to long-construct spondylodesis in patients with multiple unstable cervical metastases","authors":"E.H. Huele ,&nbsp;J.M. van der Velden ,&nbsp;H.M. Verkooijen ,&nbsp;N. Kasperts ,&nbsp;J.J. Verlaan","doi":"10.1016/j.ctro.2024.100858","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and purpose</h3><div>Currently no minimally invasive surgical treatment exists to provide immediate stability for unstable cervical/cervicothoracic metastases. Long-construct spondylodesis carries a high complication risk and has severe impact on residual range of motion. This study explores temporary halo fixation and radiotherapy as an alternative to long-construct cervical spondylodesis.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div>This retrospective cohort study included twenty patients with multiple unstable cervical metastases treated between 2013–2023. All patients underwent halo fixation for an intended duration of three months to allow for safe reossification of lytic lesions following radiotherapy, with a dose fractionation scheme best suited to the histological origin of the tumor.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Immobilization with halo fixation lasted a median 83 days (range, 41–132 days). Radiotherapy started on average 7 days after halo fixation (range, −35–118 days). The median pain score at baseline was 8, and was 0 at halo removal and at last follow-up. All patients had no or minor neurological deficits at baseline and did not develop new neurological deficits. At halo removal, 17/18 patients showed radiographic evidence of reossification. The majority of patients experienced minor limitations or had full range of motion of the neck at last follow-up.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Patients with multiple unstable cervical metastases treated with halo fixation and radiotherapy showed complete pain response or substantial pain reduction, reossification of the vertebrae and a, mostly, preserved range of motion. In selected neurologically intact patients, this treatment might be a patient-friendly alternative to fixation. Prospective evaluation of this treatment combination is needed.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10342,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology","volume":"49 ","pages":"Article 100858"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405630824001356/pdfft?md5=3c9454ee7e9131e52349a2d5b13d869d&pid=1-s2.0-S2405630824001356-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405630824001356","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and purpose

Currently no minimally invasive surgical treatment exists to provide immediate stability for unstable cervical/cervicothoracic metastases. Long-construct spondylodesis carries a high complication risk and has severe impact on residual range of motion. This study explores temporary halo fixation and radiotherapy as an alternative to long-construct cervical spondylodesis.

Materials and methods

This retrospective cohort study included twenty patients with multiple unstable cervical metastases treated between 2013–2023. All patients underwent halo fixation for an intended duration of three months to allow for safe reossification of lytic lesions following radiotherapy, with a dose fractionation scheme best suited to the histological origin of the tumor.

Results

Immobilization with halo fixation lasted a median 83 days (range, 41–132 days). Radiotherapy started on average 7 days after halo fixation (range, −35–118 days). The median pain score at baseline was 8, and was 0 at halo removal and at last follow-up. All patients had no or minor neurological deficits at baseline and did not develop new neurological deficits. At halo removal, 17/18 patients showed radiographic evidence of reossification. The majority of patients experienced minor limitations or had full range of motion of the neck at last follow-up.

Conclusion

Patients with multiple unstable cervical metastases treated with halo fixation and radiotherapy showed complete pain response or substantial pain reduction, reossification of the vertebrae and a, mostly, preserved range of motion. In selected neurologically intact patients, this treatment might be a patient-friendly alternative to fixation. Prospective evaluation of this treatment combination is needed.
在多发性不稳定颈椎转移瘤患者中,用临时光环固定和放射治疗替代长结构脊柱切除术
背景和目的目前还没有一种微创手术治疗方法可以为不稳定的颈椎/颈胸椎转移瘤提供即时稳定性。长期脊柱切除术具有很高的并发症风险,并严重影响残余活动范围。本研究探讨了临时光环固定和放疗作为长结构颈椎椎体切除术的替代方法。材料和方法这项回顾性队列研究纳入了 20 例在 2013-2023 年间接受治疗的多发性不稳定颈椎转移瘤患者。所有患者均接受了为期三个月的光环固定术,以便在放疗后安全地对溶解性病灶进行再化疗,并采用最适合肿瘤组织学来源的剂量分馏方案。结果光环固定术的中位持续时间为 83 天(41-132 天不等)。放疗平均在光环固定后7天开始(范围:-35-118天)。基线疼痛评分的中位数为 8 分,去除光环和最后一次随访时的评分为 0 分。所有患者在基线时都没有或只有轻微的神经功能缺损,也没有出现新的神经功能缺损。在去除光环时,17/18 名患者的影像学表现为再硬化。结论接受光环固定和放疗治疗的多发性不稳定颈椎转移瘤患者疼痛反应完全消失或明显减轻,椎体重新变硬,活动范围基本保持不变。对于选定的神经功能完好的患者来说,这种治疗方法可能是固定治疗的一种患者友好型替代疗法。需要对这种治疗组合进行前瞻性评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology
Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.20%
发文量
114
审稿时长
40 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信