Didactic Instruction's Impact on Medicolegal Quality of Radiation Oncology Resident Physician Documentation.

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Vaishvi Patel, Adele Duimering, Shaun K Loewen, Conley Kriegler
{"title":"Didactic Instruction's Impact on Medicolegal Quality of Radiation Oncology Resident Physician Documentation.","authors":"Vaishvi Patel, Adele Duimering, Shaun K Loewen, Conley Kriegler","doi":"10.1007/s13187-024-02508-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Effective documentation serves as a cornerstone for communication and patient care, especially in radiation oncology (RO). Studies have shown room for improvement in documentation practices, and although documentation guidelines exist, it is uncertain if RO physicians are aware of or adhere to them. We aimed to assess RO resident physicians' medicolegal knowledge and the impact of an educational intervention on documentation practices. Grading rubrics for consultation and progress notes were created using guidelines, comprising of a fundamental score and total score. Residents from two institutions attended a didactic seminar on medicolegal documentation. Pre- and post-seminar, an electronic anonymous survey was used to assess resident knowledge and perspectives and random resident consultation and progress notes were scored. Mean documentation and survey item scores from pre- and post-seminar were compared. Fourteen resident physicians participated and completed surveys, and 48 consultation notes and 40 progress notes were analyzed. No participant had prior education specific to RO documentation, nor were any aware of available resources. Post-seminar, participants' medicolegal documentation knowledge significantly increased (86.61% vs. 95.54%, p = 0.001), as did the fundamental score (83.64% vs 89.29%, p = 0.041) and total scores of consultation notes (69.82% vs. 78.98%, p = 0.001) and total score of progress notes (55% vs. 75.19%, p < 0.001). Our seminar significantly enhanced residents' medicolegal knowledge and quality of documentation, and surveys revealed a lack of speciality specific documentation education. This combined with findings from other studies and participant opinions suggest that resident physicians would benefit from such training during residency.</p>","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-024-02508-8","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Effective documentation serves as a cornerstone for communication and patient care, especially in radiation oncology (RO). Studies have shown room for improvement in documentation practices, and although documentation guidelines exist, it is uncertain if RO physicians are aware of or adhere to them. We aimed to assess RO resident physicians' medicolegal knowledge and the impact of an educational intervention on documentation practices. Grading rubrics for consultation and progress notes were created using guidelines, comprising of a fundamental score and total score. Residents from two institutions attended a didactic seminar on medicolegal documentation. Pre- and post-seminar, an electronic anonymous survey was used to assess resident knowledge and perspectives and random resident consultation and progress notes were scored. Mean documentation and survey item scores from pre- and post-seminar were compared. Fourteen resident physicians participated and completed surveys, and 48 consultation notes and 40 progress notes were analyzed. No participant had prior education specific to RO documentation, nor were any aware of available resources. Post-seminar, participants' medicolegal documentation knowledge significantly increased (86.61% vs. 95.54%, p = 0.001), as did the fundamental score (83.64% vs 89.29%, p = 0.041) and total scores of consultation notes (69.82% vs. 78.98%, p = 0.001) and total score of progress notes (55% vs. 75.19%, p < 0.001). Our seminar significantly enhanced residents' medicolegal knowledge and quality of documentation, and surveys revealed a lack of speciality specific documentation education. This combined with findings from other studies and participant opinions suggest that resident physicians would benefit from such training during residency.

教学指导对放射肿瘤学住院医师文档的医学法律质量的影响。
有效的文档记录是沟通和患者护理的基石,尤其是在肿瘤放射科(RO)。研究表明,记录实践还有改进的余地,尽管存在记录指南,但尚不确定放射肿瘤科医生是否了解或遵守这些指南。我们旨在评估放射肿瘤科住院医师的医疗法律知识以及教育干预对记录实践的影响。我们利用指南创建了会诊和进展记录评分标准,包括基本分和总分。来自两所院校的住院医师参加了关于医学法律文件记录的教学研讨会。研讨会前后,采用电子匿名调查的方式评估住院医师的知识和观点,并随机对住院医师的会诊和病程记录进行评分。对研讨会前后的文件记录和调查项目的平均得分进行比较。共有 14 名住院医师参与并填写了调查问卷,对 48 份会诊记录和 40 份进展记录进行了分析。没有任何学员接受过有关 RO 文档的专门教育,也不知道有哪些可用资源。研讨会后,参与者的医疗法律文件知识显著增加(86.61% vs. 95.54%,p = 0.001),基本得分(83.64% vs. 89.29%,p = 0.041)和会诊记录总分(69.82% vs. 78.98%,p = 0.001)以及进展记录总分(55% vs. 75.19%,p = 0.001)也显著增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信