Development and Validation of the Satisfaction Concerning Stoma Care Questionnaire (SSCQ).

IF 1.7 3区 医学 Q2 NURSING
Sebastiaan L van der Storm, Esther Z Barsom, Rob J de Haan, Marlies P Schijven
{"title":"Development and Validation of the Satisfaction Concerning Stoma Care Questionnaire (SSCQ).","authors":"Sebastiaan L van der Storm, Esther Z Barsom, Rob J de Haan, Marlies P Schijven","doi":"10.1097/WON.0000000000001106","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this research was to develop the Satisfaction Concerning Stoma Care Questionnaire (SSCQ) and evaluate its structural and convergent validity and internal reliability.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Instrument development and evaluation of validity and reliability.</p><p><strong>Subjects and setting: </strong>A preliminary 22-item SSCQ was administered in a larger web-based survey to members of 2 ostomy-related patient associations with members throughout the Netherlands. The data of patients who underwent surgery within 2 years were selected for analysis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The development of the SSCQ was informed by a preexisting survey that focused on the experiences of stoma patients with general health care. Structural validity and homogeneity of the SSCQ were assessed using explanatory factor analysis and Cronbach's α coefficients. Convergent validity was also evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The final SSCQ comprised 20 items covering 3 domains: \"preoperative care and information,\" \"postoperative care and guidance,\" and \"contact with and ostomy nurse.\" The SSCQ demonstrated structural and convergent validity and internal reliability. The Cronbach's α value of the SSCQ was 0.95, whereas the independent domains retrieved a high α coefficient ranging from 0.90 to 0.93. The SSCQ and independent domains were able to distinguish between high and low patients' ratings for satisfaction concerning the received stoma care.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The SSCQ demonstrated structural and convergent reliability, along with internal consistency. It may be used to measure the satisfaction of patients with ostomies concerning stoma care. Future prospective studies using the SSCQ are needed to generate additional insights into providing optimal care for ostomy patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":49950,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Wound Ostomy and Continence Nursing","volume":"51 5","pages":"390-396"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Wound Ostomy and Continence Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/WON.0000000000001106","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this research was to develop the Satisfaction Concerning Stoma Care Questionnaire (SSCQ) and evaluate its structural and convergent validity and internal reliability.

Design: Instrument development and evaluation of validity and reliability.

Subjects and setting: A preliminary 22-item SSCQ was administered in a larger web-based survey to members of 2 ostomy-related patient associations with members throughout the Netherlands. The data of patients who underwent surgery within 2 years were selected for analysis.

Methods: The development of the SSCQ was informed by a preexisting survey that focused on the experiences of stoma patients with general health care. Structural validity and homogeneity of the SSCQ were assessed using explanatory factor analysis and Cronbach's α coefficients. Convergent validity was also evaluated.

Results: The final SSCQ comprised 20 items covering 3 domains: "preoperative care and information," "postoperative care and guidance," and "contact with and ostomy nurse." The SSCQ demonstrated structural and convergent validity and internal reliability. The Cronbach's α value of the SSCQ was 0.95, whereas the independent domains retrieved a high α coefficient ranging from 0.90 to 0.93. The SSCQ and independent domains were able to distinguish between high and low patients' ratings for satisfaction concerning the received stoma care.

Conclusions: The SSCQ demonstrated structural and convergent reliability, along with internal consistency. It may be used to measure the satisfaction of patients with ostomies concerning stoma care. Future prospective studies using the SSCQ are needed to generate additional insights into providing optimal care for ostomy patients.

造口护理满意度问卷(SSCQ)的开发与验证。
目的:本研究旨在开发造口护理满意度问卷(SSCQ),并评估其结构效度、收敛效度和内部信度:设计:工具开发及有效性和可靠性评估:在一项规模较大的网络调查中,对荷兰各地 2 个造口相关患者协会的成员进行了初步的 22 项 SSCQ 调查。我们选取了两年内接受手术的患者数据进行分析:SSCQ 的开发参考了之前的一项调查,该调查的重点是造口患者在一般医疗保健方面的经历。使用解释性因子分析和克朗巴赫 α 系数评估了 SSCQ 的结构有效性和同质性。此外,还对收敛效度进行了评估:最终的 SSCQ 包括 20 个项目,涵盖 3 个领域:结果:最终的 SSCQ 包括 20 个项目,涵盖 3 个领域:"术前护理和信息"、"术后护理和指导 "以及 "与造口护士的联系"。SSCQ 具有结构效度、收敛效度和内部信度。SSCQ 的 Cronbach's α 值为 0.95,而独立领域的 α 系数在 0.90 至 0.93 之间。SSCQ 和独立领域能够区分患者对造口护理满意度的高低:SSCQ具有结构可靠性、收敛可靠性和内部一致性。结论:SSCQ 具有结构和收敛可靠性以及内部一致性,可用于测量造口患者对造口护理的满意度。未来需要使用 SSCQ 进行前瞻性研究,以便为造口患者提供最佳护理提供更多的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
34.60%
发文量
186
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: ​​The Journal of Wound, Ostomy and Continence Nursing (JWOCN), the official journal of the Wound, Ostomy and Continence Nurses Society™ (WOCN®), is the premier publication for wound, ostomy and continence practice and research. The Journal’s mission is to publish current best evidence and original research to guide the delivery of expert health care. The WOCN Society is a professional nursing society which supports its members by promoting educational, clinical and research opportunities to advance the practice and guide the delivery of expert health care to individuals with wounds, ostomies and continence care needs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信