{"title":"Comparison of five scores to predict mortality in malignant pleural effusion.","authors":"Merve Ayik Türk, Gülru Polat, Özer Özdemir, Yunus Türk, Berna Kömürcüoğlu","doi":"10.1007/s13304-024-01985-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Malignant pleural effusion (MPE) is a complication of malignancy. Treatment of MPE is based on predicted outcome. The aim of this study was to compare the performance characteristics of LENT, PROMISE, RECLS, AL and pNLR scores for prediction of mortality in lung cancer patients who have MPE. Patients who were diagnosed with MPE that was associated with underlying lung cancer between January 2010 and December 2019 were included and analyzed retrospectively in a single center. Outcomes considered were 30-day, 6 months, and 1-year mortality. A total of 180 patients were examined. For 30-day mortality, the areas under the ROC curves (AUC) (95% CI) were: LENT 0.83 (0.76-0.87), RECLS 0.71 (0.63-0.77), and PROMISE 0.70 (0.17-0.38). For 6-month and 1-year mortality the order of these AUCs was similar. Cox regression showed that none of the scores were significantly associated with 30-day mortality, but LENT and RECLS were significantly associated with 6-month and 1-year mortality. Comparison of - 2log likelihood ratios showed that LENT score was more, strongly associated with 6-month mortality than PROMISE (p = 0.001) or RECLS (p = 0.02). LENT score was also more strongly associated with 1-year mortality than PROMISE (p = 0.001) but there was no difference between LENT and RECLS score (p = 0.64). We observed that the LENT score was more predictive than the other scores in mortality in patients who have lung cancer and MPE. The LENT and RECLS scores have similar performance characteristics for prediction of 1-year mortality in these patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":23391,"journal":{"name":"Updates in Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"2885-2892"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Updates in Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-024-01985-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Malignant pleural effusion (MPE) is a complication of malignancy. Treatment of MPE is based on predicted outcome. The aim of this study was to compare the performance characteristics of LENT, PROMISE, RECLS, AL and pNLR scores for prediction of mortality in lung cancer patients who have MPE. Patients who were diagnosed with MPE that was associated with underlying lung cancer between January 2010 and December 2019 were included and analyzed retrospectively in a single center. Outcomes considered were 30-day, 6 months, and 1-year mortality. A total of 180 patients were examined. For 30-day mortality, the areas under the ROC curves (AUC) (95% CI) were: LENT 0.83 (0.76-0.87), RECLS 0.71 (0.63-0.77), and PROMISE 0.70 (0.17-0.38). For 6-month and 1-year mortality the order of these AUCs was similar. Cox regression showed that none of the scores were significantly associated with 30-day mortality, but LENT and RECLS were significantly associated with 6-month and 1-year mortality. Comparison of - 2log likelihood ratios showed that LENT score was more, strongly associated with 6-month mortality than PROMISE (p = 0.001) or RECLS (p = 0.02). LENT score was also more strongly associated with 1-year mortality than PROMISE (p = 0.001) but there was no difference between LENT and RECLS score (p = 0.64). We observed that the LENT score was more predictive than the other scores in mortality in patients who have lung cancer and MPE. The LENT and RECLS scores have similar performance characteristics for prediction of 1-year mortality in these patients.
期刊介绍:
Updates in Surgery (UPIS) has been founded in 2010 as the official journal of the Italian Society of Surgery. It’s an international, English-language, peer-reviewed journal dedicated to the surgical sciences. Its main goal is to offer a valuable update on the most recent developments of those surgical techniques that are rapidly evolving, forcing the community of surgeons to a rigorous debate and a continuous refinement of standards of care. In this respect position papers on the mostly debated surgical approaches and accreditation criteria have been published and are welcome for the future.
Beside its focus on general surgery, the journal draws particular attention to cutting edge topics and emerging surgical fields that are publishing in monothematic issues guest edited by well-known experts.
Updates in Surgery has been considering various types of papers: editorials, comprehensive reviews, original studies and technical notes related to specific surgical procedures and techniques on liver, colorectal, gastric, pancreatic, robotic and bariatric surgery.