{"title":"Spontaneous Efficient Differentiation of Human Pluripotent Stem Cells (hPSC) Upon Co-culture of hPSCs with Human Neonatal Foreskin Fibroblasts in 3D.","authors":"Muhammad Nihad, Sudheer Shenoy P, Bipasha Bose","doi":"10.1007/7651_2024_569","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Pluripotent stem cells (PSCs) form well-formed embryoid bodies (EBs) in 3D culture. These EBs are formed in culture media lacking leukemia inhibitory factor (LIF) or basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) in mouse and human PSCs, respectively. EBs are excellent technical tools for understanding developmental biology and inducing controlled differentiation in succeeding experimental steps. Technically speaking, EBs are spontaneously differentiated PSCs in 3D and exhibit all three lineages in a time-point/sequential manner. For example, ectoderm will form first, followed by mesoderm and endoderm. We have attempted to co-culture human neonatal foreskin-derived fibroblast cells in our laboratory with the PSCs first in 2D conditions followed by the induction of EBs (PSC+fibroblasts co-cultured) in low attachment dishes. We also performed spontaneous differentiation of such EBs (co-cultured with fibroblasts). We checked the presence of markers of various lineages, namely, ectoderm, mesoderm, and endoderm in days 6, 10, and 12 day EBs. We have also compared the fibroblast co-cultured EBs, along with control EBs (derived from only PSCs). This co-culture system mimics the natural conditions of uterine implantation and the role of the endometrial fibroblasts in the induction of further embryonic development. The fibroblast co-cultured iPSC EBs had better roundness scores than the normal iPSC EBs and had a higher expression of lineage-specific markers.</p>","PeriodicalId":18490,"journal":{"name":"Methods in molecular biology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Methods in molecular biology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/7651_2024_569","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Pluripotent stem cells (PSCs) form well-formed embryoid bodies (EBs) in 3D culture. These EBs are formed in culture media lacking leukemia inhibitory factor (LIF) or basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) in mouse and human PSCs, respectively. EBs are excellent technical tools for understanding developmental biology and inducing controlled differentiation in succeeding experimental steps. Technically speaking, EBs are spontaneously differentiated PSCs in 3D and exhibit all three lineages in a time-point/sequential manner. For example, ectoderm will form first, followed by mesoderm and endoderm. We have attempted to co-culture human neonatal foreskin-derived fibroblast cells in our laboratory with the PSCs first in 2D conditions followed by the induction of EBs (PSC+fibroblasts co-cultured) in low attachment dishes. We also performed spontaneous differentiation of such EBs (co-cultured with fibroblasts). We checked the presence of markers of various lineages, namely, ectoderm, mesoderm, and endoderm in days 6, 10, and 12 day EBs. We have also compared the fibroblast co-cultured EBs, along with control EBs (derived from only PSCs). This co-culture system mimics the natural conditions of uterine implantation and the role of the endometrial fibroblasts in the induction of further embryonic development. The fibroblast co-cultured iPSC EBs had better roundness scores than the normal iPSC EBs and had a higher expression of lineage-specific markers.
期刊介绍:
For over 20 years, biological scientists have come to rely on the research protocols and methodologies in the critically acclaimed Methods in Molecular Biology series. The series was the first to introduce the step-by-step protocols approach that has become the standard in all biomedical protocol publishing. Each protocol is provided in readily-reproducible step-by-step fashion, opening with an introductory overview, a list of the materials and reagents needed to complete the experiment, and followed by a detailed procedure that is supported with a helpful notes section offering tips and tricks of the trade as well as troubleshooting advice.