Stem the blood flow: beneficial impact of bevacizumab on survival of subventricular zone glioblastoma patients.

Abstract

Purpose: Angiogenesis is a crucial step in tumorigenesis of glioblastoma (GBM). Bevacizumab, an anti-vascular endothelial growth factor drug, is approved for second-line therapy for GBM. Glioma stem cells, presumably the cell of origin of GBM, take an active role in angiogenesis. The subventricular zone (SVZ) is the brain's largest reservoir of neural stem cells, and GBM near this region (SVZ GBM) is associated with a poor prognosis. This study aims to evaluate the potential impact of second-line bevacizumab treatment on survival in patients with SVZ GBM.

Methods: The electronic medical records of adult patients with newly diagnosed SVZ GDM under treated between 1/2011 and 12/2021 were retrospectively reviewed. Clinical, surgical, radiological, and outcome parameters were compared between patients treated with bevacizumab after first relapse to patients without such treatment.

Results: The cohort included 67 patients. 45 (67.1%) were treated with bevacizumab after the first relapse while 22 (32.9%) were not. The only statistically significant difference between groups was the rate of re-surgery, which was higher in the non-bevacizumab group (40.9% vs. 15.6%; p = 0.023), indicating that the groups were quite homogenous. In general, bevacizumab as a second-line treatment did not affect OS in SVZ GBM cases. However, it significantly prolongs survival time from 1st relapse by an average of more than 4 months, including after adjustment to re-surgery variable (HR = 0.57, 95% CI 0.34-0.94, p = 0.028 and HR = 0.57, 95%CI = 0.34-0.97, PV = 0.038; respectively). Furthermore, when adjusting to time from diagnosis to 1st relapse, bevacizumab treatment was also associated with prolonged OS (HR = 0.58; p = 0.043). In a subgroup analysis, comparing patients treated with both re-surgery and bevacizumab to patients treated in any other way, patients with the combined treatment had the longest mean OS of the entire cohort (22.16 ± 7.81 m vs. 13.60 ± 6.86, p = 0.049; HR = 0.361 95%CI 0.108-1.209, p = 0.085).

Conclusions: The use of bevacizumab as a second-line therapy in SVZ GBM cases may positively affect survival after relapse, even when given as a monotherapy. Additionally, in certain yet-to-be-identified sub-populations, bevacizumab may even extend overall survival. Further research is required to accurately identify SVZ GBM patients who would benefit most from anti-angiogenic therapy.