Predictors of Morbidity, Mortality, and Hospital Utilization Among Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography-related Hospitalizations: A Five-year Nationwide Assessment.

IF 2.8 4区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Yassine Kilani, Mahmoud Y Madi, Saqr Alsakarneh, Priscila Castro Puelo, Mohammad Aldiabat, Kym Yves Syrilan, Mariana Nunez Ferreira, Daniel Alejandro Gonzalez Mosquera, Amir H Sohail, Laith Numan, Marina Kim, Wissam Kiwan
{"title":"Predictors of Morbidity, Mortality, and Hospital Utilization Among Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography-related Hospitalizations: A Five-year Nationwide Assessment.","authors":"Yassine Kilani, Mahmoud Y Madi, Saqr Alsakarneh, Priscila Castro Puelo, Mohammad Aldiabat, Kym Yves Syrilan, Mariana Nunez Ferreira, Daniel Alejandro Gonzalez Mosquera, Amir H Sohail, Laith Numan, Marina Kim, Wissam Kiwan","doi":"10.1097/MCG.0000000000002058","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>We aimed to assess the hospital frailty risk score on the inpatient mortality, morbidity, and health care resource utilization among endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)-related hospitalizations.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Data regarding the inpatient mortality, morbidity, and health care resource utilization of ERCP among frail individuals remain limited.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample, we compared the odds of inpatient mortality and morbidity of ERCP-related hospitalizations among individuals with low frailty scores, intermediate frailty scores (IFSs), and high frailty scores (HFSs).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 776,025 ERCP-related hospitalizations were recorded from 2016 to 2020. 552,045 had a low frailty score, whereas 217,875 had an IFS, and 6105 had an HFS. Frail individuals had a 5-fold increase in mortality [IFS: adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 4.81, 95% CI: 3.77-6.14; HFS: aOR = 4.62, 95% CI: 2.48-8.63]. An IFS was associated with a 24% increase in post-ERCP pancreatitis (aOR = 1.25, 95% CI: 1.11-1.41), a 3-fold increase in post-ERCP bleeding (aOR = 2.59, 95% CI: 1.82-3.67), and a 2-fold increase in post-ERCP duct perforation (aOR = 1.91, 95% CI: 1.38-2.64). Frail individuals experienced higher odds of in-hospital morbidity, including secondary sepsis, respiratory failure, acute kidney injury, cerebrovascular accidents, deep vein thrombosis, and pulmonary embolism.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In summary, our study presents strong evidence in support of using the hospital frailty risk score as an index to predict mortality and morbidity during ERCP-related hospitalizations. Additional caution is warranted in the management of frail individuals undergoing ERCP.</p>","PeriodicalId":15457,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical gastroenterology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of clinical gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MCG.0000000000002058","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: We aimed to assess the hospital frailty risk score on the inpatient mortality, morbidity, and health care resource utilization among endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)-related hospitalizations.

Background: Data regarding the inpatient mortality, morbidity, and health care resource utilization of ERCP among frail individuals remain limited.

Materials and methods: Using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample, we compared the odds of inpatient mortality and morbidity of ERCP-related hospitalizations among individuals with low frailty scores, intermediate frailty scores (IFSs), and high frailty scores (HFSs).

Results: Overall, 776,025 ERCP-related hospitalizations were recorded from 2016 to 2020. 552,045 had a low frailty score, whereas 217,875 had an IFS, and 6105 had an HFS. Frail individuals had a 5-fold increase in mortality [IFS: adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 4.81, 95% CI: 3.77-6.14; HFS: aOR = 4.62, 95% CI: 2.48-8.63]. An IFS was associated with a 24% increase in post-ERCP pancreatitis (aOR = 1.25, 95% CI: 1.11-1.41), a 3-fold increase in post-ERCP bleeding (aOR = 2.59, 95% CI: 1.82-3.67), and a 2-fold increase in post-ERCP duct perforation (aOR = 1.91, 95% CI: 1.38-2.64). Frail individuals experienced higher odds of in-hospital morbidity, including secondary sepsis, respiratory failure, acute kidney injury, cerebrovascular accidents, deep vein thrombosis, and pulmonary embolism.

Conclusions: In summary, our study presents strong evidence in support of using the hospital frailty risk score as an index to predict mortality and morbidity during ERCP-related hospitalizations. Additional caution is warranted in the management of frail individuals undergoing ERCP.

内镜逆行胰胆管造影术相关住院患者的发病率、死亡率和医院使用率的预测因素:一项为期五年的全国性评估。
背景我们旨在评估医院虚弱风险评分对内镜逆行胰胆管造影术(ERCP)相关住院病人死亡率、发病率和医疗资源利用率的影响:背景:有关体弱者ERCP的住院死亡率、发病率和医疗资源利用率的数据仍然有限:我们使用全国住院患者样本,比较了低虚弱评分、中度虚弱评分(IFSs)和高度虚弱评分(HFSs)人群中ERCP相关住院的死亡率和发病率:从2016年到2020年,共记录了776025例ERCP相关住院病例。其中 552,045 人的虚弱程度评分较低,217,875 人的虚弱程度评分为 IFS,6105 人的虚弱程度评分为 HFS。体弱者的死亡率增加了 5 倍[IFS:调整赔率比 (aOR) = 4.81,95% CI:3.77-6.14;HFS:aOR = 4.62,95% CI:2.48-8.63]。IFS 与 ERCP 术后胰腺炎增加 24% 相关(aOR = 1.25,95% CI:1.11-1.41),与 ERCP 术后出血增加 3 倍相关(aOR = 2.59,95% CI:1.82-3.67),与 ERCP 术后导管穿孔增加 2 倍相关(aOR = 1.91,95% CI:1.38-2.64)。体弱者的院内发病率更高,包括继发性败血症、呼吸衰竭、急性肾损伤、脑血管意外、深静脉血栓和肺栓塞:总之,我们的研究提供了强有力的证据,支持使用医院虚弱风险评分作为预测 ERCP 相关住院期间死亡率和发病率的指标。在对接受ERCP治疗的体弱者进行管理时,需要更加谨慎。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of clinical gastroenterology
Journal of clinical gastroenterology 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
3.40%
发文量
339
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology gathers the world''s latest, most relevant clinical studies and reviews, case reports, and technical expertise in a single source. Regular features include cutting-edge, peer-reviewed articles and clinical reviews that put the latest research and development into the context of your practice. Also included are biographies, focused organ reviews, practice management, and therapeutic recommendations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信