Data-centric challenges with the application and adoption of artificial intelligence for drug discovery.

IF 6 2区 医学 Q1 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Expert Opinion on Drug Discovery Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-24 DOI:10.1080/17460441.2024.2403639
Ghita Ghislat, Saiveth Hernandez-Hernandez, Chayanit Piyawajanusorn, Pedro J Ballester
{"title":"Data-centric challenges with the application and adoption of artificial intelligence for drug discovery.","authors":"Ghita Ghislat, Saiveth Hernandez-Hernandez, Chayanit Piyawajanusorn, Pedro J Ballester","doi":"10.1080/17460441.2024.2403639","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Artificial intelligence (AI) is exhibiting tremendous potential to reduce the massive costs and long timescales of drug discovery. There are however important challenges currently limiting the impact and scope of AI models.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>In this perspective, the authors discuss a range of data issues (bias, inconsistency, skewness, irrelevance, small size, high dimensionality), how they challenge AI models, and which issue-specific mitigations have been effective. Next, they point out the challenges faced by uncertainty quantification techniques aimed at enhancing and trusting the predictions from these AI models. They also discuss how conceptual errors, unrealistic benchmarks and performance misestimation can confound the evaluation of models and thus their development. Lastly, the authors explain how human bias, whether from AI experts or drug discovery experts, constitutes another challenge that can be alleviated by gaining more prospective experience.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>AI models are often developed to excel on retrospective benchmarks unlikely to anticipate their prospective performance. As a result, only a few of these models are ever reported to have prospective value (e.g. by discovering potent and innovative drug leads for a therapeutic target). The authors have discussed what can go wrong in practice with AI for drug discovery. The authors hope that this will help inform the decisions of editors, funders investors, and researchers working in this area.</p>","PeriodicalId":12267,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Drug Discovery","volume":" ","pages":"1297-1307"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Opinion on Drug Discovery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17460441.2024.2403639","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Artificial intelligence (AI) is exhibiting tremendous potential to reduce the massive costs and long timescales of drug discovery. There are however important challenges currently limiting the impact and scope of AI models.

Areas covered: In this perspective, the authors discuss a range of data issues (bias, inconsistency, skewness, irrelevance, small size, high dimensionality), how they challenge AI models, and which issue-specific mitigations have been effective. Next, they point out the challenges faced by uncertainty quantification techniques aimed at enhancing and trusting the predictions from these AI models. They also discuss how conceptual errors, unrealistic benchmarks and performance misestimation can confound the evaluation of models and thus their development. Lastly, the authors explain how human bias, whether from AI experts or drug discovery experts, constitutes another challenge that can be alleviated by gaining more prospective experience.

Expert opinion: AI models are often developed to excel on retrospective benchmarks unlikely to anticipate their prospective performance. As a result, only a few of these models are ever reported to have prospective value (e.g. by discovering potent and innovative drug leads for a therapeutic target). The authors have discussed what can go wrong in practice with AI for drug discovery. The authors hope that this will help inform the decisions of editors, funders investors, and researchers working in this area.

在药物研发中应用和采用人工智能所面临的以数据为中心的挑战。
引言:人工智能(AI)在降低药物研发的巨额成本和缩短研发周期方面展现出巨大潜力。然而,目前存在的一些重要挑战限制了人工智能模型的影响和范围:在这一视角中,作者讨论了一系列数据问题(偏差、不一致性、倾斜度、不相关性、小规模、高维度),这些问题如何对人工智能模型构成挑战,以及哪些针对特定问题的缓解措施是有效的。接下来,他们指出了不确定性量化技术所面临的挑战,这些技术旨在增强和信任这些人工智能模型的预测结果。他们还讨论了概念错误、不切实际的基准和性能错误估计会如何干扰模型评估,进而影响模型开发。最后,作者解释了人类偏见(无论是来自人工智能专家还是药物发现专家)如何构成另一个挑战,而这可以通过获得更多前瞻性经验来缓解:人工智能模型的开发往往是为了在回顾性基准上取得优异成绩,而不太可能预测其未来表现。因此,只有少数模型被报道具有前瞻性价值(例如,为治疗靶点发现强效创新药物线索)。作者讨论了人工智能药物发现在实践中可能出现的问题。作者希望这将有助于为编辑、资助者、投资者和从事该领域工作的研究人员提供决策依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.20
自引率
1.60%
发文量
78
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Expert Opinion on Drug Discovery (ISSN 1746-0441 [print], 1746-045X [electronic]) is a MEDLINE-indexed, peer-reviewed, international journal publishing review articles on novel technologies involved in the drug discovery process, leading to new leads and reduced attrition rates. Each article is structured to incorporate the author’s own expert opinion on the scope for future development. The Editors welcome: Reviews covering chemoinformatics; bioinformatics; assay development; novel screening technologies; in vitro/in vivo models; structure-based drug design; systems biology Drug Case Histories examining the steps involved in the preclinical and clinical development of a particular drug The audience consists of scientists and managers in the healthcare and pharmaceutical industry, academic pharmaceutical scientists and other closely related professionals looking to enhance the success of their drug candidates through optimisation at the preclinical level.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信