{"title":"Assessment of MeMed BV assays for differentiating between bacterial and viral respiratory infections.","authors":"Karen C Carroll","doi":"10.1080/14737159.2024.2408743","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Distinguishing bacterial from viral infections remains a challenge due to clinically indistinguishable presentations. Non-infectious conditions such as malignancy, pulmonary emboli and rheumatological conditions may also present with fever. Consequently, patients are often over-treated with antimicrobial agents or may not receive adequate therapy.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>This article provides a comprehensive review of a novel protein host-signature assay, the MeMed BV assay, that distinguishes bacterial from viral infections. The focus is on the use of the test in respiratory tract infections including assay performance characteristics, clinical profiles and data on cost-effectiveness. The changing landscape from the use of single inflammatory biomarkers, such as C-reactive protein, to alternative and diverse host signature biomarkers, is also discussed.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>The MeMed BV assay is one of several novel host biomarkers that provide rapid results and demonstrate enhanced performance compared to single test biomarkers. This assay has been validated by a large number of carefully controlled clinical trials that demonstrate improved performance characteristics for distinguishing bacterial infections or combined bacterial/viral infections from viral or noninfectious causes of fever compared to C-reactive protein and procalcitonin. However, these trials may over-state assay performance as samples with equivocal band results are often not included in the statistical analysis. More real-world studies addressing clinical implementation of the MeMed BV assay or other biomarkers into ambulatory settings are needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":12113,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Molecular Diagnostics","volume":" ","pages":"873-884"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Review of Molecular Diagnostics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14737159.2024.2408743","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Distinguishing bacterial from viral infections remains a challenge due to clinically indistinguishable presentations. Non-infectious conditions such as malignancy, pulmonary emboli and rheumatological conditions may also present with fever. Consequently, patients are often over-treated with antimicrobial agents or may not receive adequate therapy.
Areas covered: This article provides a comprehensive review of a novel protein host-signature assay, the MeMed BV assay, that distinguishes bacterial from viral infections. The focus is on the use of the test in respiratory tract infections including assay performance characteristics, clinical profiles and data on cost-effectiveness. The changing landscape from the use of single inflammatory biomarkers, such as C-reactive protein, to alternative and diverse host signature biomarkers, is also discussed.
Expert opinion: The MeMed BV assay is one of several novel host biomarkers that provide rapid results and demonstrate enhanced performance compared to single test biomarkers. This assay has been validated by a large number of carefully controlled clinical trials that demonstrate improved performance characteristics for distinguishing bacterial infections or combined bacterial/viral infections from viral or noninfectious causes of fever compared to C-reactive protein and procalcitonin. However, these trials may over-state assay performance as samples with equivocal band results are often not included in the statistical analysis. More real-world studies addressing clinical implementation of the MeMed BV assay or other biomarkers into ambulatory settings are needed.
期刊介绍:
Expert Review of Molecular Diagnostics (ISSN 1473-7159) publishes expert reviews of the latest advancements in the field of molecular diagnostics including the detection and monitoring of the molecular causes of disease that are being translated into groundbreaking diagnostic and prognostic technologies to be used in the clinical diagnostic setting.
Each issue of Expert Review of Molecular Diagnostics contains leading reviews on current and emerging topics relating to molecular diagnostics, subject to a rigorous peer review process; editorials discussing contentious issues in the field; diagnostic profiles featuring independent, expert evaluations of diagnostic tests; meeting reports of recent molecular diagnostics conferences and key paper evaluations featuring assessments of significant, recently published articles from specialists in molecular diagnostic therapy.
Expert Review of Molecular Diagnostics provides the forum for reporting the critical advances being made in this ever-expanding field, as well as the major challenges ahead in their clinical implementation. The journal delivers this information in concise, at-a-glance article formats: invaluable to a time-constrained community.