{"title":"A comprehensive investigation of the adsorption behaviour and mechanism of industrial waste sintering and bayer red muds for heavy metals.","authors":"Lisheng Guo, Xin Xu, Qing Wang, Xiaoqing Yuan, Cencen Niu, Xiaoqiang Dong, Xiaofeng Liu, Haomin Lei, Lu Zhou","doi":"10.1007/s10653-024-02205-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The issue of heavy metal pollution is a critical global concern that requires urgent solution. However, conventional heavy metal adsorbents are too costly to be applied in large-scale engineering. In this study, adsorption behavior and mechanism of sintering red mud (RM-A) and bayer red mud (RM-B) for heavy metals were investigated to address the disposal of red mud as industrial waste and remediation of heavy metal pollution. Batch adsorption experiments were conducted to explore the adsorption performances of RM-A and RM-B under various conditions. Characterization of RM-A and RM-B before and after adsorption by XRD, FTIR and SEM-EDX was applied to investigate the specific adsorption behavior and mechanism. Adsorption experiments of both RM-A and RM-B fitted pseudo-second-order kinetic model and Langmuir isotherm model, with estimated maximum adsorption capacity of 21.96 and 25.19 mg/g for Cd<sup>2+</sup>, 21.47 and 26.06 mg/g for Cu<sup>2+</sup> and 55.47 and 59.65 mg/g for Pb<sup>2+</sup>, respectively. Precipitation transformation of calcite was the primary adsorption mechanism for RM-A, whereas ion exchange of cancrinite, surface coordination compounds of hematite and minor precipitation transformation of calcite accounted for the adsorption mechanism for RM-B. Overall, RM-A and RM-B exhibited best adsorption performance for Pb<sup>2+</sup>, with RM-B showing greater adsorption capacity attributed to its higher specific surface area. This study compared the adsorption properties of RM-A and RM-B for the first time and demonstrated that both red muds can be effectively applied to remove heavy metals, thereby contributing to the sustainable industrial waste management and resourceful reuse.</p>","PeriodicalId":11759,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Geochemistry and Health","volume":"46 11","pages":"434"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Geochemistry and Health","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10653-024-02205-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The issue of heavy metal pollution is a critical global concern that requires urgent solution. However, conventional heavy metal adsorbents are too costly to be applied in large-scale engineering. In this study, adsorption behavior and mechanism of sintering red mud (RM-A) and bayer red mud (RM-B) for heavy metals were investigated to address the disposal of red mud as industrial waste and remediation of heavy metal pollution. Batch adsorption experiments were conducted to explore the adsorption performances of RM-A and RM-B under various conditions. Characterization of RM-A and RM-B before and after adsorption by XRD, FTIR and SEM-EDX was applied to investigate the specific adsorption behavior and mechanism. Adsorption experiments of both RM-A and RM-B fitted pseudo-second-order kinetic model and Langmuir isotherm model, with estimated maximum adsorption capacity of 21.96 and 25.19 mg/g for Cd2+, 21.47 and 26.06 mg/g for Cu2+ and 55.47 and 59.65 mg/g for Pb2+, respectively. Precipitation transformation of calcite was the primary adsorption mechanism for RM-A, whereas ion exchange of cancrinite, surface coordination compounds of hematite and minor precipitation transformation of calcite accounted for the adsorption mechanism for RM-B. Overall, RM-A and RM-B exhibited best adsorption performance for Pb2+, with RM-B showing greater adsorption capacity attributed to its higher specific surface area. This study compared the adsorption properties of RM-A and RM-B for the first time and demonstrated that both red muds can be effectively applied to remove heavy metals, thereby contributing to the sustainable industrial waste management and resourceful reuse.
期刊介绍:
Environmental Geochemistry and Health publishes original research papers and review papers across the broad field of environmental geochemistry. Environmental geochemistry and health establishes and explains links between the natural or disturbed chemical composition of the earth’s surface and the health of plants, animals and people.
Beneficial elements regulate or promote enzymatic and hormonal activity whereas other elements may be toxic. Bedrock geochemistry controls the composition of soil and hence that of water and vegetation. Environmental issues, such as pollution, arising from the extraction and use of mineral resources, are discussed. The effects of contaminants introduced into the earth’s geochemical systems are examined. Geochemical surveys of soil, water and plants show how major and trace elements are distributed geographically. Associated epidemiological studies reveal the possibility of causal links between the natural or disturbed geochemical environment and disease. Experimental research illuminates the nature or consequences of natural or disturbed geochemical processes.
The journal particularly welcomes novel research linking environmental geochemistry and health issues on such topics as: heavy metals (including mercury), persistent organic pollutants (POPs), and mixed chemicals emitted through human activities, such as uncontrolled recycling of electronic-waste; waste recycling; surface-atmospheric interaction processes (natural and anthropogenic emissions, vertical transport, deposition, and physical-chemical interaction) of gases and aerosols; phytoremediation/restoration of contaminated sites; food contamination and safety; environmental effects of medicines; effects and toxicity of mixed pollutants; speciation of heavy metals/metalloids; effects of mining; disturbed geochemistry from human behavior, natural or man-made hazards; particle and nanoparticle toxicology; risk and the vulnerability of populations, etc.