Enhancing EEG data quality and precision for cloud-based clinical applications: an evaluation of the SLOG framework.

IF 1.3 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Amna Ghani, Hartmut Heinrich, Trevor Brown, Klaus Schellhorn
{"title":"Enhancing EEG data quality and precision for cloud-based clinical applications: an evaluation of the SLOG framework.","authors":"Amna Ghani, Hartmut Heinrich, Trevor Brown, Klaus Schellhorn","doi":"10.1088/2057-1976/ad7e2d","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Automation is revamping our preprocessing pipelines, and accelerating the delivery of personalized digital medicine. It improves efficiency, reduces costs, and allows clinicians to treat patients without significant delays. However, the influx of multimodal data highlights the need to protect sensitive information, such as clinical data, and safeguard data fidelity. One of the neuroimaging modalities that produces large amounts of time-series data is Electroencephalography (EEG). It captures the neural dynamics in a task or resting brain state with high temporal resolution. EEG electrodes placed on the scalp acquire electrical activity from the brain. These electrical potentials attenuate as they cross multiple layers of brain tissue and fluid yielding relatively weaker signals than noise-low signal-to-noise ratio. EEG signals are further distorted by internal physiological artifacts, such as eye movements (EOG) or heartbeat (ECG), and external noise, such as line noise (50 Hz). EOG artifacts, due to their proximity to the frontal brain regions, are particularly challenging to eliminate. Therefore, a widely used EOG rejection method, independent component analysis (ICA), demands manual inspection of the marked EOG components before they are rejected from the EEG data. We underscore the inaccuracy of automatized ICA rejection and provide an auxiliary algorithm-Second Layer Inspection for EOG (SLOG) in the clinical environment. SLOG based on spatial and temporal patterns of eye movements, re-examines the already marked EOG artifacts and confirms no EEG-related activity is mistakenly eliminated in this artifact rejection step. SLOG achieved a 99% precision rate on the simulated dataset while 85% precision on the real EEG dataset. One of the primary considerations for cloud-based applications is operational costs, including computing power. Algorithms like SLOG allow us to maintain data fidelity and precision without overloading the cloud platforms and maxing out our budgets.</p>","PeriodicalId":8896,"journal":{"name":"Biomedical Physics & Engineering Express","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomedical Physics & Engineering Express","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/2057-1976/ad7e2d","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Automation is revamping our preprocessing pipelines, and accelerating the delivery of personalized digital medicine. It improves efficiency, reduces costs, and allows clinicians to treat patients without significant delays. However, the influx of multimodal data highlights the need to protect sensitive information, such as clinical data, and safeguard data fidelity. One of the neuroimaging modalities that produces large amounts of time-series data is Electroencephalography (EEG). It captures the neural dynamics in a task or resting brain state with high temporal resolution. EEG electrodes placed on the scalp acquire electrical activity from the brain. These electrical potentials attenuate as they cross multiple layers of brain tissue and fluid yielding relatively weaker signals than noise-low signal-to-noise ratio. EEG signals are further distorted by internal physiological artifacts, such as eye movements (EOG) or heartbeat (ECG), and external noise, such as line noise (50 Hz). EOG artifacts, due to their proximity to the frontal brain regions, are particularly challenging to eliminate. Therefore, a widely used EOG rejection method, independent component analysis (ICA), demands manual inspection of the marked EOG components before they are rejected from the EEG data. We underscore the inaccuracy of automatized ICA rejection and provide an auxiliary algorithm-Second Layer Inspection for EOG (SLOG) in the clinical environment. SLOG based on spatial and temporal patterns of eye movements, re-examines the already marked EOG artifacts and confirms no EEG-related activity is mistakenly eliminated in this artifact rejection step. SLOG achieved a 99% precision rate on the simulated dataset while 85% precision on the real EEG dataset. One of the primary considerations for cloud-based applications is operational costs, including computing power. Algorithms like SLOG allow us to maintain data fidelity and precision without overloading the cloud platforms and maxing out our budgets.

提高基于云的临床应用的脑电图数据质量和精确度:SLOG 框架评估。
自动化正在改造我们的预处理流水线,加速个性化数字医疗的交付。它提高了效率,降低了成本,使临床医生能够在不严重延误的情况下治疗病人。然而,多模态数据的涌入凸显了保护临床数据等敏感信息和保障数据真实性的必要性。脑电图(EEG)是产生大量时间序列数据的神经成像模式之一。它能以高时间分辨率捕捉任务或静息大脑状态下的神经动态。放置在头皮上的脑电图电极可获取大脑的电活动。这些电位在穿过多层脑组织和脑液时会衰减,产生比噪声相对较弱的信号--信噪比低。内部生理伪像(如眼球运动(EOG)或心跳(ECG))和外部噪声(如 50 Hz 线路噪声)会进一步扭曲脑电信号。眼动图伪影由于靠近大脑额叶区域,消除起来尤其具有挑战性。因此,一种广泛使用的眼动图剔除方法--独立成分分析(ICA)--需要在从脑电图数据中剔除标记的眼动图成分之前对其进行人工检查。我们强调了自动 ICA 剔除的不准确性,并在临床环境中提供了一种辅助算法--EOG 第二层检测(SLOG)。SLOG 以眼球运动的空间和时间模式为基础,重新检查已标记的眼动图伪像,并确认在这一伪像剔除步骤中没有错误地剔除与脑电图相关的活动。SLOG 在模拟数据集上实现了 99% 的精确率,而在真实 EEG 数据集上实现了 85% 的精确率。基于云的应用的主要考虑因素之一是运营成本,包括计算能力。像 SLOG 这样的算法可以让我们保持数据的保真度和精确度,而不会让云平台超载,也不会让我们的预算达到极限。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Biomedical Physics & Engineering Express
Biomedical Physics & Engineering Express RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
153
期刊介绍: BPEX is an inclusive, international, multidisciplinary journal devoted to publishing new research on any application of physics and/or engineering in medicine and/or biology. Characterized by a broad geographical coverage and a fast-track peer-review process, relevant topics include all aspects of biophysics, medical physics and biomedical engineering. Papers that are almost entirely clinical or biological in their focus are not suitable. The journal has an emphasis on publishing interdisciplinary work and bringing research fields together, encompassing experimental, theoretical and computational work.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信