Prevalence and etiology of ventilator-associated pneumonia during the COVID-19 pandemic in Denmark: Wave-dependent lessons learned from a mixed-ICU.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-23 DOI:10.1111/aas.14523
Joanna Grzywacz, Magnus G Ahlström, Thomas Benfield, Ronan M G Berg, Ronni R Plovsing, Andreas Ronit
{"title":"Prevalence and etiology of ventilator-associated pneumonia during the COVID-19 pandemic in Denmark: Wave-dependent lessons learned from a mixed-ICU.","authors":"Joanna Grzywacz, Magnus G Ahlström, Thomas Benfield, Ronan M G Berg, Ronni R Plovsing, Andreas Ronit","doi":"10.1111/aas.14523","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) may be a particular concern in patients with severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). We aimed to determine the prevalence and etiology of VAP in critically ill COVID-19 patients in a Danish intensive care unit (ICU) during the first three waves of the COVID-19 pandemic and to study associations between dexamethasone (DXM) use and development of VAP.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In an observational single-center study patients were retrospectively screened for VAP including causative pathogens, use of DXM and commonly used antibiotics. Diagnosis of VAP required invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) >48 h with presence of a new bacterial agent and clinical signs of infection. For analysis, common descriptive statistics were applied. Cox proportional hazards models were used to analyze the association between DXM use and VAP.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>VAP was detected in 53/119 (44.5%) mechanically ventilated patients across all three COVID-19 waves. Median length of IMV for VAP patients was 24 [15-41] days, and 3 out of 4 were males. VAP was most prevalent (47.0%) during the second wave. Common pathogens included Klebsiella pneumoniae (24.5%), Enterobacter aerogenes (17.0%) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (13.2%), Staphylococcus aureus (13.2%), and Escherichia coli (13.2%). A change from Gram-negative bacteria only to a combination of Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria was observed in the second wave compared to first. Use of DXM was not associated with VAP (adjusted hazard ratio 1.63 95% CI: 0.84-3.17).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The prevalence of VAP was high across all three COVID-19 waves and showed a different distribution of pathogens between the first and second wave. Use of DXM was not associated with VAP development. Further and larger studies are needed to understand the risk factors associated with VAP in patients with COVID-19.</p>","PeriodicalId":6909,"journal":{"name":"Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica","volume":" ","pages":"1409-1416"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/aas.14523","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) may be a particular concern in patients with severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). We aimed to determine the prevalence and etiology of VAP in critically ill COVID-19 patients in a Danish intensive care unit (ICU) during the first three waves of the COVID-19 pandemic and to study associations between dexamethasone (DXM) use and development of VAP.

Methods: In an observational single-center study patients were retrospectively screened for VAP including causative pathogens, use of DXM and commonly used antibiotics. Diagnosis of VAP required invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) >48 h with presence of a new bacterial agent and clinical signs of infection. For analysis, common descriptive statistics were applied. Cox proportional hazards models were used to analyze the association between DXM use and VAP.

Results: VAP was detected in 53/119 (44.5%) mechanically ventilated patients across all three COVID-19 waves. Median length of IMV for VAP patients was 24 [15-41] days, and 3 out of 4 were males. VAP was most prevalent (47.0%) during the second wave. Common pathogens included Klebsiella pneumoniae (24.5%), Enterobacter aerogenes (17.0%) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (13.2%), Staphylococcus aureus (13.2%), and Escherichia coli (13.2%). A change from Gram-negative bacteria only to a combination of Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria was observed in the second wave compared to first. Use of DXM was not associated with VAP (adjusted hazard ratio 1.63 95% CI: 0.84-3.17).

Conclusion: The prevalence of VAP was high across all three COVID-19 waves and showed a different distribution of pathogens between the first and second wave. Use of DXM was not associated with VAP development. Further and larger studies are needed to understand the risk factors associated with VAP in patients with COVID-19.

丹麦 COVID-19 大流行期间呼吸机相关肺炎的发病率和病因:从混合重症监护病房汲取的经验教训。
背景:呼吸机相关性肺炎(VAP)可能是2019年严重冠状病毒病(COVID-19)患者特别关注的问题。我们旨在确定 COVID-19 大流行前三波期间丹麦重症监护病房(ICU)中 COVID-19 重症患者中 VAP 的发病率和病因,并研究地塞米松(DXM)的使用与 VAP 发生之间的关联:在一项观察性单中心研究中,对 VAP 患者进行了回顾性筛查,包括致病病原体、DXM 使用情况和常用抗生素。VAP的诊断要求侵入性机械通气(IMV)时间大于48小时,且存在新的细菌病原体和感染的临床症状。分析中采用了常见的描述性统计方法。采用 Cox 比例危险模型分析使用 DXM 与 VAP 之间的关系:在 COVID-19 的所有三个波次中,53/119(44.5%)名机械通气患者检测到 VAP。VAP 患者的 IMV 中位时间为 24 [15-41] 天,4 人中有 3 人为男性。VAP 在第二波中最为常见(47.0%)。常见病原体包括肺炎克雷伯菌(24.5%)、产气肠杆菌(17.0%)、铜绿假单胞菌(13.2%)、金黄色葡萄球菌(13.2%)和大肠埃希菌(13.2%)。与第一波相比,第二波观察到的细菌从仅有革兰氏阴性菌变为革兰氏阳性菌和革兰氏阴性菌的组合。使用 DXM 与 VAP 无关(调整后危险比为 1.63 95% CI:0.84-3.17):结论:在 COVID-19 的三个波次中,VAP 的发病率都很高,并且在第一和第二波次中病原体的分布有所不同。使用 DXM 与 VAP 的发生无关。要了解与 COVID-19 患者 VAP 相关的风险因素,还需要进一步开展更大规模的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
9.50%
发文量
157
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica publishes papers on original work in the fields of anaesthesiology, intensive care, pain, emergency medicine, and subjects related to their basic sciences, on condition that they are contributed exclusively to this Journal. Case reports and short communications may be considered for publication if of particular interest; also letters to the Editor, especially if related to already published material. The editorial board is free to discuss the publication of reviews on current topics, the choice of which, however, is the prerogative of the board. Every effort will be made by the Editors and selected experts to expedite a critical review of manuscripts in order to ensure rapid publication of papers of a high scientific standard.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信