Performance of a new generation balloon expandable stent-graft (Gore VBX) as bridging stent for B-EVAR.

Ciro Ferrer, Ottavia Borghese, Bernardo Orellana, Carlotta Mancusi, Federico F Pennetta, Carlo Coscarella, Marco Giudice, Rocco Giudice
{"title":"Performance of a new generation balloon expandable stent-graft (Gore VBX) as bridging stent for B-EVAR.","authors":"Ciro Ferrer, Ottavia Borghese, Bernardo Orellana, Carlotta Mancusi, Federico F Pennetta, Carlo Coscarella, Marco Giudice, Rocco Giudice","doi":"10.23736/S0021-9509.24.13071-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The aim of this study was to report the results of a single-centre experience with a new generation balloon expandable stent-graft (Viabahn VBX; W. L. Gore & Associates, Flagstaff, AZ, USA) as bridging stent in branched endovascular aortic repair (B-EVAR).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a retrospective single institution analysis of a prospectively maintained database. All patients undergone implantation of at least one VBX as bridging stent in B-EVAR over the last 5 years (from July 1, 2018, to November 31, 2023) were included. Primary outcomes were technical success, primary and secondary stent patency rate, branch-related reinterventions, and branch instability. Secondary outcomes were clinical success, mortality, and rate of aortic-related reinterventions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study involved 40 patients for a total of 147 VBX stent-grafts implanted in 141 target vessels as bridging stents in B-EVAR (62.5% off-the-shelf and 37.5% custom made devices; 65% with outer branches and 35% with inner branches) for the treatment of 38 (95%) degenerative and 2 (5%) postdissection aneurysms. In 28 cases (70%) a total transfemoral approach was used to deliver the bridging stents. Technical success was 100%. No target vessel was lost intraoperatively. Over a median follow-up of 26.5 months (range 0-74), primary and secondary patency, branch-related reintervention, and branch instability were 98.5% (139/141), 99.3% (140/141), 15% (6/40), and 4.9% (7/141), respectively. Four of the 7 cases of branch instability, all requiring an endovascular correction, were secondary to type Ic endoleak. Clinical success was 97.5% as effect of 1 perioperative death. During the follow-up other 6 patients died, contributing to an overall survival rate of 82.5%. The overall rate of aortic-related reinterventions was 20%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite further evaluation is mandatory to determine durability of the VBX in the long-term after B-EVAR, in our experience VBX demonstrated a high flexibility and trackability, excellent stent retention, and outstanding patency over time. A generous distal landing of the bridging stent into the target vessel should be always achieved, whereas possible, to reduce the risk of type Ic endoleak, which seems to be the main cause of branch instability.</p>","PeriodicalId":101333,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of cardiovascular surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of cardiovascular surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0021-9509.24.13071-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The aim of this study was to report the results of a single-centre experience with a new generation balloon expandable stent-graft (Viabahn VBX; W. L. Gore & Associates, Flagstaff, AZ, USA) as bridging stent in branched endovascular aortic repair (B-EVAR).

Methods: This is a retrospective single institution analysis of a prospectively maintained database. All patients undergone implantation of at least one VBX as bridging stent in B-EVAR over the last 5 years (from July 1, 2018, to November 31, 2023) were included. Primary outcomes were technical success, primary and secondary stent patency rate, branch-related reinterventions, and branch instability. Secondary outcomes were clinical success, mortality, and rate of aortic-related reinterventions.

Results: This study involved 40 patients for a total of 147 VBX stent-grafts implanted in 141 target vessels as bridging stents in B-EVAR (62.5% off-the-shelf and 37.5% custom made devices; 65% with outer branches and 35% with inner branches) for the treatment of 38 (95%) degenerative and 2 (5%) postdissection aneurysms. In 28 cases (70%) a total transfemoral approach was used to deliver the bridging stents. Technical success was 100%. No target vessel was lost intraoperatively. Over a median follow-up of 26.5 months (range 0-74), primary and secondary patency, branch-related reintervention, and branch instability were 98.5% (139/141), 99.3% (140/141), 15% (6/40), and 4.9% (7/141), respectively. Four of the 7 cases of branch instability, all requiring an endovascular correction, were secondary to type Ic endoleak. Clinical success was 97.5% as effect of 1 perioperative death. During the follow-up other 6 patients died, contributing to an overall survival rate of 82.5%. The overall rate of aortic-related reinterventions was 20%.

Conclusions: Despite further evaluation is mandatory to determine durability of the VBX in the long-term after B-EVAR, in our experience VBX demonstrated a high flexibility and trackability, excellent stent retention, and outstanding patency over time. A generous distal landing of the bridging stent into the target vessel should be always achieved, whereas possible, to reduce the risk of type Ic endoleak, which seems to be the main cause of branch instability.

新一代球囊扩张支架移植物(戈尔 VBX)作为 B-EVAR 桥接支架的性能。
背景:本研究旨在报告新一代球囊扩张支架移植物(Viabahn VBX; W. L. Gore & Associates, Flagstaff, AZ, USA)作为桥接支架用于分支血管内主动脉修复术(B-EVAR)的单中心经验结果:这是一项对前瞻性数据库进行的单机构回顾性分析。纳入了过去 5 年(2018 年 7 月 1 日至 2023 年 11 月 31 日)中至少接受过一次 VBX 作为桥接支架植入 B-EVAR 的所有患者。主要结果为技术成功率、主要和次要支架通畅率、分支相关再介入和分支不稳定性。次要结果为临床成功率、死亡率和主动脉相关再介入率:这项研究涉及 40 名患者,共在 141 根目标血管中植入了 147 个 VBX 支架移植物,作为 B-EVAR 的桥接支架(62.5% 为现成设备,37.5% 为定制设备;65% 用于外分支,35% 用于内分支),用于治疗 38 个(95%)退行性动脉瘤和 2 个(5%)断裂后动脉瘤。在 28 个病例(70%)中,采用了经股动脉的方法植入桥接支架。技术成功率为 100%。术中没有丢失目标血管。在中位 26.5 个月(0-74 个月)的随访中,一次和二次通畅率、分支相关的再介入率以及分支不稳定性分别为 98.5% (139/141)、99.3% (140/141)、15% (6/40) 和 4.9% (7/141)。7 例分支不稳定病例中,有 4 例继发于 Ic 型内漏,均需要进行血管内矫正。临床成功率为97.5%,1例围手术期死亡。在随访期间,另有6名患者死亡,总存活率为82.5%。与主动脉相关的再干预总比率为20%:尽管需要进一步评估才能确定 VBX 在 B-EVAR 术后的长期耐久性,但根据我们的经验,VBX 表现出了高度的灵活性和可追踪性、出色的支架固定性以及长期出色的通畅性。在可能的情况下,桥接支架的远端应尽可能多地进入靶血管,以降低 Ic 型内漏的风险,这似乎是分支不稳定的主要原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信