The acceptability of using wearable electronic devices to monitor physical activity of patients with Multiple Myeloma undergoing treatment: a systematic review.

Q4 Health Professions
Clinical hematology international Pub Date : 2024-07-29 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.46989/001c.121406
Tommy Brown, Ann Muls, Charlotte Pawlyn, Kevin Boyd, Susanne Cruickshank
{"title":"The acceptability of using wearable electronic devices to monitor physical activity of patients with Multiple Myeloma undergoing treatment: a systematic review.","authors":"Tommy Brown, Ann Muls, Charlotte Pawlyn, Kevin Boyd, Susanne Cruickshank","doi":"10.46989/001c.121406","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Multiple myeloma (MM) is diagnosed in 6,000 people in the UK yearly. A performance status measure, based on the patients' reported level of physical activity, is used to assess patients' fitness for treatment. This systematic review aims to explore the current evidence for the acceptability of using wearable devices in patients treated for MM to measure physical activity directly.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Three databases were searched (MEDLINE, EMBASE and CINAHL) up until 7th September 2023. Prospective studies using wearable devices to monitor physical activity in patients on treatment for MM were included. Bias across the studies was assessed using the CASP tool.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nine studies, with 220 patients on treatment for MM, were included. Only two studies had a low risk of bias. Different wearable device brands were used for varying lengths of time and were worn on either the wrist, upper arm, or chest. Adherence, reported in seven studies, ranged from 50% to 90%. Six studies reported an adherence greater than 75%. Although physical activity was also measured in a heterogenous manner, most studies reported reduced physical activity during treatment, associated with a higher symptom burden.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Monitoring patients receiving treatment for MM with a wearable device appears acceptable as an objective measure to evaluate physical activity. Due to the heterogeneity of the methods used, the generalisability of the results is limited. Future studies should explore the data collected prospectively and their ability to predict relevant clinical outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":93942,"journal":{"name":"Clinical hematology international","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11391912/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical hematology international","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46989/001c.121406","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Multiple myeloma (MM) is diagnosed in 6,000 people in the UK yearly. A performance status measure, based on the patients' reported level of physical activity, is used to assess patients' fitness for treatment. This systematic review aims to explore the current evidence for the acceptability of using wearable devices in patients treated for MM to measure physical activity directly.

Methods: Three databases were searched (MEDLINE, EMBASE and CINAHL) up until 7th September 2023. Prospective studies using wearable devices to monitor physical activity in patients on treatment for MM were included. Bias across the studies was assessed using the CASP tool.

Results: Nine studies, with 220 patients on treatment for MM, were included. Only two studies had a low risk of bias. Different wearable device brands were used for varying lengths of time and were worn on either the wrist, upper arm, or chest. Adherence, reported in seven studies, ranged from 50% to 90%. Six studies reported an adherence greater than 75%. Although physical activity was also measured in a heterogenous manner, most studies reported reduced physical activity during treatment, associated with a higher symptom burden.

Conclusion: Monitoring patients receiving treatment for MM with a wearable device appears acceptable as an objective measure to evaluate physical activity. Due to the heterogeneity of the methods used, the generalisability of the results is limited. Future studies should explore the data collected prospectively and their ability to predict relevant clinical outcomes.

使用可穿戴电子设备监测接受治疗的多发性骨髓瘤患者体力活动的可接受性:系统性综述。
导言:在英国,每年有 6,000 人被确诊为多发性骨髓瘤(MM)。根据患者报告的体力活动水平来衡量患者的表现状况,用于评估患者是否适合接受治疗。本系统性综述旨在探究在接受 MM 治疗的患者中使用可穿戴设备直接测量体力活动的可接受性的现有证据:方法:检索了三个数据库(MEDLINE、EMBASE 和 CINAHL),截止日期为 2023 年 9 月 7 日。研究纳入了使用可穿戴设备监测 MM 治疗患者体力活动的前瞻性研究。使用 CASP 工具评估了各项研究的偏倚性:结果:共纳入九项研究,220 名接受 MM 治疗的患者。只有两项研究的偏倚风险较低。不同品牌的可穿戴设备使用的时间长短不一,佩戴的部位有的在手腕,有的在上臂,有的在胸部。七项研究报告的依从性从 50% 到 90% 不等。六项研究报告的坚持率超过 75%。虽然体力活动的测量方法也不尽相同,但大多数研究报告称,治疗期间体力活动减少与症状负担加重有关:结论:使用可穿戴设备监测接受 MM 治疗的患者似乎可以作为评估体力活动的客观措施。由于所用方法的异质性,研究结果的普遍性受到了限制。未来的研究应探索前瞻性收集的数据及其预测相关临床结果的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信