Long-term Clinical Outcomes of Patients With Negative Pathology (pN0) at Primary Retroperitoneal Lymph Node Dissection.

Fady Baky, Nicole Liso, Brandon Williams, Andrea Knezevic, Samuel A Funt, Darren R Feldman, Brett Carver, Joel Sheinfeld, Richard S Matulewicz
{"title":"Long-term Clinical Outcomes of Patients With Negative Pathology (pN0) at Primary Retroperitoneal Lymph Node Dissection.","authors":"Fady Baky, Nicole Liso, Brandon Williams, Andrea Knezevic, Samuel A Funt, Darren R Feldman, Brett Carver, Joel Sheinfeld, Richard S Matulewicz","doi":"10.1016/j.clgc.2024.102217","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients who undergo primary retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (pRPLND) for early-stage testicular cancer and have no cancer (pN0) found in the retroperitoneum are believed to have an excellent prognosis. However, some experience relapse, potentially due to limitations of current staging methods. We aim to describe long-term outcomes and relapse patterns among a contemporary cohort of patients found to be pN0 at pRPLND to identify opportunities for improved diagnostic approaches and optimal patient selection.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We reviewed our prospectively maintained database for patients who underwent pRPLND for nonseminomatous germ cell tumors at our tertiary cancer center during the period from January 1, 2000, through September 30, 2023 (n = 628). We excluded 282 patients with node-positive pathology for a final analytic cohort of 346 patients. Our primary outcome was recurrence-free survival (RFS). Secondary outcomes included timing and location of recurrence.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 346 included patients with pN0 pathology, 23 experienced relapse with a 2-year RFS rate of 93% (95% confidence interval: 90, 96). Most recurrences (70%) occurred in the lungs and within 6 months of pRPLND. Serum tumor markers were positive in 43% of patients at the time of relapse. All patients who relapsed were treated with salvage chemotherapy; 6 patients required additional surgical procedures. There was no testis cancer-related deaths.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Two-year RFS for patients with pN0 pRPLND pathology is excellent. All recurrences were outside of the retroperitoneum, suggesting subclinical distant metastases at time of surgery and the benefits of a bilateral template dissection. Improved diagnostics may help better identify patients with disease within or outside of the retroperitoneum prior to pRPLND, helping guide treatment decisions.</p>","PeriodicalId":93941,"journal":{"name":"Clinical genitourinary cancer","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical genitourinary cancer","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clgc.2024.102217","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Patients who undergo primary retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (pRPLND) for early-stage testicular cancer and have no cancer (pN0) found in the retroperitoneum are believed to have an excellent prognosis. However, some experience relapse, potentially due to limitations of current staging methods. We aim to describe long-term outcomes and relapse patterns among a contemporary cohort of patients found to be pN0 at pRPLND to identify opportunities for improved diagnostic approaches and optimal patient selection.

Methods: We reviewed our prospectively maintained database for patients who underwent pRPLND for nonseminomatous germ cell tumors at our tertiary cancer center during the period from January 1, 2000, through September 30, 2023 (n = 628). We excluded 282 patients with node-positive pathology for a final analytic cohort of 346 patients. Our primary outcome was recurrence-free survival (RFS). Secondary outcomes included timing and location of recurrence.

Results: Of 346 included patients with pN0 pathology, 23 experienced relapse with a 2-year RFS rate of 93% (95% confidence interval: 90, 96). Most recurrences (70%) occurred in the lungs and within 6 months of pRPLND. Serum tumor markers were positive in 43% of patients at the time of relapse. All patients who relapsed were treated with salvage chemotherapy; 6 patients required additional surgical procedures. There was no testis cancer-related deaths.

Conclusions: Two-year RFS for patients with pN0 pRPLND pathology is excellent. All recurrences were outside of the retroperitoneum, suggesting subclinical distant metastases at time of surgery and the benefits of a bilateral template dissection. Improved diagnostics may help better identify patients with disease within or outside of the retroperitoneum prior to pRPLND, helping guide treatment decisions.

原发性腹膜后淋巴结切除术病理阴性(pN0)患者的长期临床疗效。
背景:接受腹膜后淋巴结清扫术(primary retroperitoneal lymph node dissection,ppRPLND)治疗早期睾丸癌且腹膜后未发现癌症(pN0)的患者被认为预后极佳。然而,一些患者会出现复发,这可能是由于目前的分期方法存在局限性。我们的目的是描述一组在腹膜后淋巴结清扫术(pRPLND)中发现为 pN0 的患者的长期预后和复发模式,以确定改进诊断方法和优化患者选择的机会:我们回顾了我们的前瞻性数据库,该数据库收录了2000年1月1日至2023年9月30日期间在我们的三级癌症中心接受pRPLND治疗的非肉芽肿性生殖细胞肿瘤患者(n = 628)。我们排除了282例结节阳性病理患者,最终分析队列为346例患者。我们的主要结果是无复发生存率(RFS)。次要结果包括复发时间和复发部位:在 346 例病理结果为 pN0 的患者中,23 例复发,2 年无复发生存率为 93%(95% 置信区间:90, 96)。大多数复发(70%)发生在肺部,且发生在 pRPLND 后 6 个月内。43%的患者在复发时血清肿瘤标志物呈阳性。所有复发患者都接受了挽救性化疗;6 名患者需要进行额外的手术治疗。没有睾丸癌相关死亡病例:结论:pN0 pRPLND病理患者的两年RFS非常好。所有复发都在腹膜后以外,这表明手术时存在亚临床远处转移,以及双侧模板切除的益处。诊断方法的改进可能有助于在进行pRPLND之前更好地识别腹膜后或腹膜外疾病患者,从而为治疗决策提供指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信