Alpha transcranial alternating current stimulation as add-on to neglect training: a randomized trial.

IF 4.1 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Brain communications Pub Date : 2024-08-30 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1093/braincomms/fcae287
Marij Middag-van Spanje, Tanja C W Nijboer, Jan Schepers, Caroline van Heugten, Alexander T Sack, Teresa Schuhmann
{"title":"Alpha transcranial alternating current stimulation as add-on to neglect training: a randomized trial.","authors":"Marij Middag-van Spanje, Tanja C W Nijboer, Jan Schepers, Caroline van Heugten, Alexander T Sack, Teresa Schuhmann","doi":"10.1093/braincomms/fcae287","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Visuospatial neglect is a common and debilitating condition following unilateral stroke, significantly impacting cognitive functioning and daily life. There is an urgent need for effective treatments that can provide clinically relevant and sustained benefits. In addition to traditional stroke treatment, non-invasive brain stimulation, such as transcranial alternating current stimulation, shows promise as a complementary approach to enhance stroke recovery. In the current study, we aimed to evaluate the additive effects of multi-session transcranial alternating current stimulation at alpha frequency when combined with visual scanning training in chronic stroke patients with visuospatial neglect. In this double-blind randomized controlled trial, we compared the effects of active transcranial alternating current stimulation at alpha frequency to sham (placebo) transcranial alternating current stimulation, both combined with visual scanning training. Both groups received eighteen 40-minute training sessions over a 6-week period. A total of 22 chronic visuospatial neglect patients participated in the study (active group <i>n</i> = 12, sham group <i>n</i> = 10). The median age was 61.0 years, with a median time since stroke of 36.1 months. We assessed the patients at six time-points: at baseline, after the first, ninth and eighteenth training sessions, as well as 1 week and 3 months following the completion of the combined neuromodulation intervention. The primary outcome measure was the change in performance on a visual search task, specifically the star cancellation task. Secondary outcomes included performance on a visual detection task, two line bisection tasks and three tasks evaluating visuospatial neglect in daily living. We found significantly improved visual search (primary outcome) and visual detection performance in the neglected side in the active transcranial alternating current stimulation group, compared to the sham transcranial alternating current stimulation group. We did not observe stimulation effects on line bisection performance nor in daily living. Time effects were observed on all but one outcome measures. Multi-session transcranial alternating current stimulation combined with visual scanning training may be a more effective treatment for chronic visuospatial neglect than visual scanning training alone. These findings provide valuable insights into novel strategies for stroke recovery, even long after the injury, with the aim of enhancing cognitive rehabilitation outcomes and improving the overall quality of life for individuals affected by this condition. <b>Trial registration</b>: ClinicalTrials.gov; registration number: NCT05466487; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05466487.</p>","PeriodicalId":93915,"journal":{"name":"Brain communications","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11411215/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain communications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/braincomms/fcae287","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Visuospatial neglect is a common and debilitating condition following unilateral stroke, significantly impacting cognitive functioning and daily life. There is an urgent need for effective treatments that can provide clinically relevant and sustained benefits. In addition to traditional stroke treatment, non-invasive brain stimulation, such as transcranial alternating current stimulation, shows promise as a complementary approach to enhance stroke recovery. In the current study, we aimed to evaluate the additive effects of multi-session transcranial alternating current stimulation at alpha frequency when combined with visual scanning training in chronic stroke patients with visuospatial neglect. In this double-blind randomized controlled trial, we compared the effects of active transcranial alternating current stimulation at alpha frequency to sham (placebo) transcranial alternating current stimulation, both combined with visual scanning training. Both groups received eighteen 40-minute training sessions over a 6-week period. A total of 22 chronic visuospatial neglect patients participated in the study (active group n = 12, sham group n = 10). The median age was 61.0 years, with a median time since stroke of 36.1 months. We assessed the patients at six time-points: at baseline, after the first, ninth and eighteenth training sessions, as well as 1 week and 3 months following the completion of the combined neuromodulation intervention. The primary outcome measure was the change in performance on a visual search task, specifically the star cancellation task. Secondary outcomes included performance on a visual detection task, two line bisection tasks and three tasks evaluating visuospatial neglect in daily living. We found significantly improved visual search (primary outcome) and visual detection performance in the neglected side in the active transcranial alternating current stimulation group, compared to the sham transcranial alternating current stimulation group. We did not observe stimulation effects on line bisection performance nor in daily living. Time effects were observed on all but one outcome measures. Multi-session transcranial alternating current stimulation combined with visual scanning training may be a more effective treatment for chronic visuospatial neglect than visual scanning training alone. These findings provide valuable insights into novel strategies for stroke recovery, even long after the injury, with the aim of enhancing cognitive rehabilitation outcomes and improving the overall quality of life for individuals affected by this condition. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov; registration number: NCT05466487; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05466487.

阿尔法经颅交变电流刺激作为忽视训练的附加项目:随机试验。
视觉空间忽略是单侧中风后一种常见的致残性疾病,严重影响认知功能和日常生活。目前急需能提供临床相关和持续疗效的有效治疗方法。除了传统的中风治疗外,非侵入性脑刺激(如经颅交变电流刺激)有望成为促进中风康复的补充方法。在本研究中,我们旨在评估α频率多疗程经颅交变电流刺激与视觉扫描训练相结合对患有视觉空间忽略的慢性中风患者的叠加效应。在这项双盲随机对照试验中,我们比较了α频率主动经颅交变电流刺激与假性(安慰剂)经颅交变电流刺激的效果,两者都结合了视觉扫描训练。两组患者都在 6 周内接受了 18 次 40 分钟的训练。共有 22 名慢性视觉空间忽视患者参加了研究(活性组 12 人,假性组 10 人)。中位年龄为 61.0 岁,中风后的中位时间为 36.1 个月。我们在六个时间点对患者进行了评估:基线、第一次、第九次和第十八次训练后,以及联合神经调控干预完成后的一周和三个月。主要结果是视觉搜索任务(特别是星形消除任务)的成绩变化。次要结果包括一项视觉检测任务、两项线段分割任务和三项评估日常生活中视觉空间忽略的任务。我们发现,与假性经颅交变电流刺激组相比,主动经颅交变电流刺激组的视觉搜索(主要结果)和被忽视一侧的视觉检测表现均有明显改善。我们没有观察到刺激对划线能力或日常生活的影响。除一项结果测量外,其他所有结果测量都观察到了时间效应。多疗程经颅交变电流刺激结合视觉扫描训练可能比单独的视觉扫描训练更有效地治疗慢性视觉空间忽略。这些研究结果为中风康复的新策略提供了有价值的见解,即使是在伤后很长时间,目的也是为了提高认知康复效果,改善受中风影响的患者的整体生活质量。试验注册:试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov;注册号:NCT05466487;注册号:NCT05466487:NCT05466487;https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05466487。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信