Patterns of cerebral damage in multiple sclerosis and aquaporin-4 antibody-positive neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders-major differences revealed by non-conventional imaging.

IF 4.1 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Brain communications Pub Date : 2024-08-30 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1093/braincomms/fcae295
Paweł Jakuszyk, Aleksandra Podlecka-Piętowska, Bartosz Kossowski, Monika Nojszewska, Beata Zakrzewska-Pniewska, Maciej Juryńczyk
{"title":"Patterns of cerebral damage in multiple sclerosis and aquaporin-4 antibody-positive neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders-major differences revealed by non-conventional imaging.","authors":"Paweł Jakuszyk, Aleksandra Podlecka-Piętowska, Bartosz Kossowski, Monika Nojszewska, Beata Zakrzewska-Pniewska, Maciej Juryńczyk","doi":"10.1093/braincomms/fcae295","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Multiple sclerosis and aquaporin-4 antibody neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders are distinct autoimmune CNS disorders with overlapping clinical features but differing pathology. Multiple sclerosis is primarily a demyelinating disease with the presence of widespread axonal damage, while neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders is characterized by astrocyte injury with secondary demyelination. Diagnosis is typically based on lesion characteristics observed on standard MRI imaging and antibody testing but can be challenging in patients with in-between clinical presentations. Non-conventional MRI techniques can provide valuable diagnostic information by measuring disease processes at the microstructural level. We used non-conventional MRI to measure markers of axonal loss in specific white matter tracts in multiple sclerosis and neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders, depending on their relationship with focal lesions. Patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (<i>n</i> = 20), aquaporin-4 antibody-associated neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (<i>n</i> = 20) and healthy controls (<i>n</i> = 20) underwent a 3T brain MRI, including T<sub>1</sub>-, T<sub>2</sub>- and diffusion-weighted sequences, quantitative susceptibility mapping and phase-sensitive inversion recovery sequence. Tractometry was used to differentiate tract fibres traversing through white matter lesions from those that did not. Neurite density index was assessed using neurite orientation dispersion and density imaging model. Cortical damage was evaluated using T<sub>1</sub> relaxation rates. Cortical lesions and paramagnetic rim lesions were identified using phase-sensitive inversion recovery and quantitative susceptibility mapping. In tracts traversing lesions, only one out of 50 tracts showed a decreased neurite density index in multiple sclerosis compared with neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders. Among 50 tracts not traversing lesions, six showed reduced neurite density in multiple sclerosis (including three in the cerebellum and brainstem) compared to neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders. In multiple sclerosis, reduced neurite density was found in the majority of fibres traversing (40/50) and not traversing (37/50) white matter lesions when compared to healthy controls. A negative correlation between neurite density in lesion-free fibres and cortical lesions, but not paramagnetic rim lesions, was observed in multiple sclerosis (39/50 tracts). In neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders compared to healthy controls, decreased neurite density was observed in a subset of fibres traversing white matter lesions, but not in lesion-free fibres. In conclusion, we identified significant differences between multiple sclerosis and neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders corresponding to their distinct pathologies. Specifically, in multiple sclerosis, neurite density reduction was widespread across fibres, regardless of their relationship to white matter lesions, while in neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders, this reduction was limited to fibres passing through white matter lesions. Further studies are needed to evaluate the discriminatory potential of neurite density measures in white matter tracts for differentiating multiple sclerosis from neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders.</p>","PeriodicalId":93915,"journal":{"name":"Brain communications","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11384145/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain communications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/braincomms/fcae295","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Multiple sclerosis and aquaporin-4 antibody neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders are distinct autoimmune CNS disorders with overlapping clinical features but differing pathology. Multiple sclerosis is primarily a demyelinating disease with the presence of widespread axonal damage, while neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders is characterized by astrocyte injury with secondary demyelination. Diagnosis is typically based on lesion characteristics observed on standard MRI imaging and antibody testing but can be challenging in patients with in-between clinical presentations. Non-conventional MRI techniques can provide valuable diagnostic information by measuring disease processes at the microstructural level. We used non-conventional MRI to measure markers of axonal loss in specific white matter tracts in multiple sclerosis and neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders, depending on their relationship with focal lesions. Patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (n = 20), aquaporin-4 antibody-associated neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (n = 20) and healthy controls (n = 20) underwent a 3T brain MRI, including T1-, T2- and diffusion-weighted sequences, quantitative susceptibility mapping and phase-sensitive inversion recovery sequence. Tractometry was used to differentiate tract fibres traversing through white matter lesions from those that did not. Neurite density index was assessed using neurite orientation dispersion and density imaging model. Cortical damage was evaluated using T1 relaxation rates. Cortical lesions and paramagnetic rim lesions were identified using phase-sensitive inversion recovery and quantitative susceptibility mapping. In tracts traversing lesions, only one out of 50 tracts showed a decreased neurite density index in multiple sclerosis compared with neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders. Among 50 tracts not traversing lesions, six showed reduced neurite density in multiple sclerosis (including three in the cerebellum and brainstem) compared to neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders. In multiple sclerosis, reduced neurite density was found in the majority of fibres traversing (40/50) and not traversing (37/50) white matter lesions when compared to healthy controls. A negative correlation between neurite density in lesion-free fibres and cortical lesions, but not paramagnetic rim lesions, was observed in multiple sclerosis (39/50 tracts). In neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders compared to healthy controls, decreased neurite density was observed in a subset of fibres traversing white matter lesions, but not in lesion-free fibres. In conclusion, we identified significant differences between multiple sclerosis and neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders corresponding to their distinct pathologies. Specifically, in multiple sclerosis, neurite density reduction was widespread across fibres, regardless of their relationship to white matter lesions, while in neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders, this reduction was limited to fibres passing through white matter lesions. Further studies are needed to evaluate the discriminatory potential of neurite density measures in white matter tracts for differentiating multiple sclerosis from neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders.

多发性硬化症和水肿素-4 抗体阳性神经脊髓炎视网膜频谱疾病的脑损伤模式--非常规成像揭示的主要差异。
多发性硬化症和水肿素-4 抗体神经脊髓炎视网膜谱系障碍是两种不同的自身免疫性中枢神经系统疾病,它们的临床特征相互重叠,但病理却各不相同。多发性硬化症主要是一种脱髓鞘疾病,存在广泛的轴索损伤,而神经脊髓炎视网膜频谱疾病的特征是星形胶质细胞损伤和继发性脱髓鞘。诊断通常基于标准核磁共振成像和抗体检测所观察到的病变特征,但对于临床表现介于两者之间的患者来说,诊断具有挑战性。非常规磁共振成像技术可通过测量微观结构水平的疾病过程提供有价值的诊断信息。我们使用非常规磁共振成像技术来测量多发性硬化症和神经性脊髓炎视网膜频谱疾病特定白质束中轴突丢失的标记物,这取决于它们与病灶的关系。复发缓解型多发性硬化症患者(20 人)、水光蛋白-4 抗体相关神经脊髓炎视网膜频谱疾病患者(20 人)和健康对照组(20 人)接受了 3T 脑部磁共振成像,包括 T1、T2 和弥散加权序列、定量感性图谱和相敏反转恢复序列。迹线测量法用于区分穿越白质病变的迹线纤维和未穿越白质病变的迹线纤维。神经元密度指数是利用神经元定向分散和密度成像模型评估的。皮质损伤通过 T1 松弛率进行评估。皮质病变和顺磁边缘病变是通过相敏反转恢复和定量易感性绘图确定的。与神经性脊髓炎视网膜频谱病变相比,在穿越病变的50个神经束中,只有一个神经束显示多发性硬化症的神经元密度指数下降。在未穿越病变的 50 个神经束中,有 6 个神经束(包括小脑和脑干的 3 个神经束)显示多发性硬化症的神经元密度比神经性脊髓炎视网膜频谱疾病的神经元密度低。在多发性硬化症中,与健康对照组相比,大多数穿越(40/50)和未穿越(37/50)白质病变的纤维的神经元密度都有所降低。在多发性硬化症中,无病变纤维的神经元密度与皮质病变呈负相关,但与顺磁边缘病变无关(39/50 条)。与健康对照组相比,在神经性脊髓炎视网膜谱系障碍中,在穿越白质病变的纤维中观察到神经元密度降低,但在无病变纤维中未观察到神经元密度降低。总之,我们发现多发性硬化症和神经性脊髓炎视网膜频谱紊乱症之间存在明显差异,这与它们各自不同的病理特征相对应。具体来说,在多发性硬化症中,神经元密度的降低广泛存在于所有纤维中,无论它们与白质病变的关系如何;而在神经性脊髓炎视网膜频谱疾病中,这种降低仅限于穿过白质病变的纤维。需要进一步研究评估白质束中神经元密度测量的鉴别潜力,以区分多发性硬化症和神经性脊髓炎视神经频谱紊乱。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信