Impact of electronic medical records on healthcare delivery in Nigeria: A review.

PLOS digital health Pub Date : 2024-09-13 eCollection Date: 2024-09-01 DOI:10.1371/journal.pdig.0000420
Sarah Oreoluwa Olukorode, Oluwakorede Joshua Adedeji, Adetayo Adetokun, Ajibola Ibraheem Abioye
{"title":"Impact of electronic medical records on healthcare delivery in Nigeria: A review.","authors":"Sarah Oreoluwa Olukorode, Oluwakorede Joshua Adedeji, Adetayo Adetokun, Ajibola Ibraheem Abioye","doi":"10.1371/journal.pdig.0000420","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Electronic medical records (EMRs) have great potential to improve healthcare processes and outcomes. They are increasingly available in Nigeria, as in many developing countries. The impact of their introduction has not been well studied. We sought to synthesize the evidence from primary studies of the effect of EMRs on data quality, patient-relevant outcomes and patient satisfaction. We identified and examined five original research articles published up to May 2023 in the following medical literature databases: PUBMED/Medline, EMBASE, Web of Science, African Journals Online and Google Scholar. Four studies examined the influence of the introduction of or improvements in the EMR on data collection and documentation. The pooled percentage difference in data quality after introducing or improving the EMR was 142% (95% CI: 82% to 203%, p-value < 0.001). There was limited heterogeneity in the estimates (I2 = 0%, p-heterogeneity = 0.93) and no evidence suggestive of publication bias. The 5th study assessed patient satisfaction with pharmacy services following the introduction of the EMR but neither had a comparison group nor assessed patient satisfaction before EMR was introduced. We conclude that the introduction of EMR in Nigerian healthcare facilities meaningfully increased the quality of the data.</p>","PeriodicalId":74465,"journal":{"name":"PLOS digital health","volume":"3 9","pages":"e0000420"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11398640/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLOS digital health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pdig.0000420","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Electronic medical records (EMRs) have great potential to improve healthcare processes and outcomes. They are increasingly available in Nigeria, as in many developing countries. The impact of their introduction has not been well studied. We sought to synthesize the evidence from primary studies of the effect of EMRs on data quality, patient-relevant outcomes and patient satisfaction. We identified and examined five original research articles published up to May 2023 in the following medical literature databases: PUBMED/Medline, EMBASE, Web of Science, African Journals Online and Google Scholar. Four studies examined the influence of the introduction of or improvements in the EMR on data collection and documentation. The pooled percentage difference in data quality after introducing or improving the EMR was 142% (95% CI: 82% to 203%, p-value < 0.001). There was limited heterogeneity in the estimates (I2 = 0%, p-heterogeneity = 0.93) and no evidence suggestive of publication bias. The 5th study assessed patient satisfaction with pharmacy services following the introduction of the EMR but neither had a comparison group nor assessed patient satisfaction before EMR was introduced. We conclude that the introduction of EMR in Nigerian healthcare facilities meaningfully increased the quality of the data.

电子病历对尼日利亚医疗服务的影响:综述。
电子病历(EMR)在改善医疗流程和结果方面具有巨大潜力。与许多发展中国家一样,尼日利亚也越来越多地采用电子病历。但对其引入所产生的影响还没有进行深入研究。我们试图综合 EMR 对数据质量、患者相关结果和患者满意度的影响的主要研究证据。我们在以下医学文献数据库中查找并研究了截至 2023 年 5 月发表的五篇原创研究文章:PUBMED/Medline、EMBASE、Web of Science、African Journals Online 和 Google Scholar。四项研究探讨了引入或改进电子病历对数据收集和记录的影响。引入或改进电子病历后,数据质量的汇总百分比差异为 142%(95% CI:82% 至 203%,P 值小于 0.001)。估计值的异质性有限(I2 = 0%,p-异质性 = 0.93),没有证据表明存在发表偏倚。第 5 项研究评估了引入电子病历系统后患者对药房服务的满意度,但既没有对比组,也没有评估引入电子病历系统前患者的满意度。我们的结论是,尼日利亚医疗机构引入电子病历后,数据质量得到了显著提高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信