Impact of a pilot mHealth intervention on treatment outcomes of TB patients seeking care in the private sector using Propensity Scores Matching-Evidence collated from New Delhi, India.

PLOS digital health Pub Date : 2024-09-11 eCollection Date: 2024-09-01 DOI:10.1371/journal.pdig.0000421
Ridhima Sodhi, Vindhya Vatsyayan, Vikas Panibatla, Khasim Sayyad, Jason Williams, Theresa Pattery, Arnab Pal
{"title":"Impact of a pilot mHealth intervention on treatment outcomes of TB patients seeking care in the private sector using Propensity Scores Matching-Evidence collated from New Delhi, India.","authors":"Ridhima Sodhi, Vindhya Vatsyayan, Vikas Panibatla, Khasim Sayyad, Jason Williams, Theresa Pattery, Arnab Pal","doi":"10.1371/journal.pdig.0000421","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Mobile health applications called Digital Adherence Technologies (DATs), are increasingly used for improving treatment adherence among Tuberculosis patients to attain cure, and/or other chronic diseases requiring long-term and complex medication regimens. These DATs are found to be useful in resource-limited settings because of their cost efficiency in reaching out to vulnerable groups (providing pill and clinic visit reminders, relevant health information, and motivational messages) or those staying in remote or rural areas. Despite their growing ubiquity, there is very limited evidence on how DATs improve healthcare outcomes. We analyzed the uptake of DATs in an urban setting (DS-DOST, powered by Connect for LifeTM, Johnson & Johnson) among different patient groups accessing TB services in New Delhi, India, and subsequently assessed its impact in improving patient engagement and treatment outcomes. This study aims to understand the uptake patterns of a digital adherence technology and its impact in improving follow-ups and treatment outcomes among TB patients. Propensity choice modelling was used to create balanced treated and untreated patient datasets, before applying simple ordinary least square and logistic regression methods to estimate the causal impact of the intervention on the number of follow-ups made with the patient and treatment outcomes. After controlling for potential confounders, it was found that patients who installed and utilized DS-DOST application received an average of 6.4 (95% C.I. [5.32 to 7.557]) additional follow-ups, relative to those who did not utilize the application. This translates to a 58% increase. They also had a 245% higher likelihood of treatment success (Odds ratio: 3.458; 95% C.I. [1.709 to 6.996]).</p>","PeriodicalId":74465,"journal":{"name":"PLOS digital health","volume":"3 9","pages":"e0000421"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11389929/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLOS digital health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pdig.0000421","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Mobile health applications called Digital Adherence Technologies (DATs), are increasingly used for improving treatment adherence among Tuberculosis patients to attain cure, and/or other chronic diseases requiring long-term and complex medication regimens. These DATs are found to be useful in resource-limited settings because of their cost efficiency in reaching out to vulnerable groups (providing pill and clinic visit reminders, relevant health information, and motivational messages) or those staying in remote or rural areas. Despite their growing ubiquity, there is very limited evidence on how DATs improve healthcare outcomes. We analyzed the uptake of DATs in an urban setting (DS-DOST, powered by Connect for LifeTM, Johnson & Johnson) among different patient groups accessing TB services in New Delhi, India, and subsequently assessed its impact in improving patient engagement and treatment outcomes. This study aims to understand the uptake patterns of a digital adherence technology and its impact in improving follow-ups and treatment outcomes among TB patients. Propensity choice modelling was used to create balanced treated and untreated patient datasets, before applying simple ordinary least square and logistic regression methods to estimate the causal impact of the intervention on the number of follow-ups made with the patient and treatment outcomes. After controlling for potential confounders, it was found that patients who installed and utilized DS-DOST application received an average of 6.4 (95% C.I. [5.32 to 7.557]) additional follow-ups, relative to those who did not utilize the application. This translates to a 58% increase. They also had a 245% higher likelihood of treatment success (Odds ratio: 3.458; 95% C.I. [1.709 to 6.996]).

使用倾向分数匹配法进行移动医疗试点干预对在私营部门就医的肺结核患者治疗结果的影响--印度新德里的证据整理。
被称为 "数字坚持治疗技术"(DATs)的移动医疗应用程序越来越多地用于提高结核病患者坚持治疗的积极性,以达到治愈的目的,和/或用于其他需要长期和复杂用药方案的慢性疾病。在资源有限的环境中,这些 DATs 被认为是有用的,因为它们在接触弱势群体(提供服药和就诊提醒、相关健康信息和激励信息)或偏远或农村地区的人群方面具有成本效益。尽管 DAT 日益普及,但有关 DAT 如何改善医疗效果的证据却非常有限。我们分析了在印度新德里接受结核病服务的不同患者群体在城市环境中对 DAT(DS-DOST,由 Connect for LifeTM 提供,强生公司)的使用情况,并随后评估了它在提高患者参与度和治疗效果方面的影响。本研究旨在了解数字依从性技术的使用模式及其对改善肺结核患者随访和治疗效果的影响。研究采用倾向选择模型来创建平衡的治疗和未治疗患者数据集,然后应用简单的普通最小二乘法和逻辑回归方法来估计干预对患者随访次数和治疗效果的因果影响。在控制了潜在的混杂因素后,研究发现安装并使用 DS-DOST 应用程序的患者平均接受了 6.4 次(95% C.I. [5.32 至 7.557])额外的随访,而未使用该应用程序的患者平均接受了 6.4 次(95% C.I. [5.32 至 7.557])额外的随访。这相当于增加了 58%。他们治疗成功的可能性也增加了 245%(比率:3.458;95% C.I. [1.709 至 6.996])。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信