Contextualised digital health communication infrastructure standards for resource-constrained settings: Perception of digital health stakeholders regarding suitability for Uganda's health system.

PLOS digital health Pub Date : 2024-09-12 eCollection Date: 2024-09-01 DOI:10.1371/journal.pdig.0000603
Andrew Egwar Alunyu, Mercy Rebekah Amiyo, Josephine Nabukenya
{"title":"Contextualised digital health communication infrastructure standards for resource-constrained settings: Perception of digital health stakeholders regarding suitability for Uganda's health system.","authors":"Andrew Egwar Alunyu, Mercy Rebekah Amiyo, Josephine Nabukenya","doi":"10.1371/journal.pdig.0000603","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Ignoring the need to contextualise international standards has caused low-resourced countries to implement digital health systems on the ad-hoc, thereby often failing to meet the local needs or scale up. Authors have recommended adapting standards to a country's context. However, to date, most resources constrained countries like Uganda have not done so, affecting their success in attaining the full benefits of using ICT to support their health systems. They apply the standards 'as is' with little regard for their fitness for potential use and ability to fulfil the country's digital health needs. A design science approach was followed to elicit digital health communication infrastructure (DHCI) requirements and develop the contextual DHCI standards for Uganda. The design science methodology's design cycle supported DHCI standards' construction and evaluation activities. Whereas two workgroup sessions were held to craft the standards, three cycles of evaluation and refinement were performed. The final refinement produces the contextualised DHCI standards approved by Uganda's DH stakeholders through summative evaluation. Results of the summative evaluation show that DH stakeholders agree that the statement of the standards and the requirements specification are suitable to guide DHCI standards implementation in Uganda. Stakeholders agreed that the standards are complete, have the potential to realise DHCI requirements in Uganda, that have been well structured and follow international style for standards, and finally, that the standards are fit to realise their intended use in Uganda. Having been endorsed by DH stakeholders in Uganda's health system, the standards should be piloted to establish their potency to improve health information exchange and healthcare outcomes. Also, we recommend other low middle income countries (LMICs) with similar challenges to those in Uganda adopt the same set of contextualised DHCI standards.</p>","PeriodicalId":74465,"journal":{"name":"PLOS digital health","volume":"3 9","pages":"e0000603"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11392385/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLOS digital health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pdig.0000603","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Ignoring the need to contextualise international standards has caused low-resourced countries to implement digital health systems on the ad-hoc, thereby often failing to meet the local needs or scale up. Authors have recommended adapting standards to a country's context. However, to date, most resources constrained countries like Uganda have not done so, affecting their success in attaining the full benefits of using ICT to support their health systems. They apply the standards 'as is' with little regard for their fitness for potential use and ability to fulfil the country's digital health needs. A design science approach was followed to elicit digital health communication infrastructure (DHCI) requirements and develop the contextual DHCI standards for Uganda. The design science methodology's design cycle supported DHCI standards' construction and evaluation activities. Whereas two workgroup sessions were held to craft the standards, three cycles of evaluation and refinement were performed. The final refinement produces the contextualised DHCI standards approved by Uganda's DH stakeholders through summative evaluation. Results of the summative evaluation show that DH stakeholders agree that the statement of the standards and the requirements specification are suitable to guide DHCI standards implementation in Uganda. Stakeholders agreed that the standards are complete, have the potential to realise DHCI requirements in Uganda, that have been well structured and follow international style for standards, and finally, that the standards are fit to realise their intended use in Uganda. Having been endorsed by DH stakeholders in Uganda's health system, the standards should be piloted to establish their potency to improve health information exchange and healthcare outcomes. Also, we recommend other low middle income countries (LMICs) with similar challenges to those in Uganda adopt the same set of contextualised DHCI standards.

为资源有限的环境制定符合国情的数字医疗通信基础设施标准:数字医疗利益相关者对乌干达医疗系统适用性的看法。
由于忽视了将国际标准与具体情况相结合的必要性,资源匮乏的国家只能临时实施数字医疗系统,因此往往无法满足当地需求或扩大规模。有学者建议根据各国国情调整标准。然而,迄今为止,大多数资源有限的国家(如乌干达)并没有这样做,这影响了它们利用信息和通信技术来支持其卫生系统的全部效益。他们 "原封不动 "地应用标准,很少考虑这些标准是否适合潜在用途,是否能够满足本国的数字医疗需求。我们采用了一种设计科学方法,以了解数字医疗通信基础设施(DHCI)的需求,并为乌干达制定符合国情的 DHCI 标准。设计科学方法的设计周期为 DHCI 标准的构建和评估活动提供了支持。在召开两次工作组会议制定标准的同时,还进行了三个周期的评估和完善。通过总结性评估,最终完善了乌干达卫生部利益相关者批准的符合国情的 DHCI 标准。总结性评估的结果表明,卫生部利益相关方一致认为,标准的声明和要求说明适合于指导乌干达实施 DHCI 标准。利益相关者一致认为,这些标准是完整的,具有在乌干达实现 DHCI 要求的潜力,结构合理,符合国际标准,最后,这些标准适合在乌干达实现其预期用途。在得到乌干达卫生系统中卫生利益相关者的认可后,应该对这些标准进行试点,以确定其在改善卫生信息交流和医疗成果方面的潜力。此外,我们还建议与乌干达面临类似挑战的其他中低收入国家(LMICs)也采用同一套符合国情的 DHCI 标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信