Value of ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging in the assessment of Achilles tendon healing following percutaneous repair with the Dresden instrument.

Orthopadie (Heidelberg, Germany) Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-23 DOI:10.1007/s00132-024-04565-9
German Joannas, Rafael Barousse, Leandro Casola, Guillermo Arrondo, Stefan Rammelt, Maria Eugenia Fratantoni
{"title":"Value of ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging in the assessment of Achilles tendon healing following percutaneous repair with the Dresden instrument.","authors":"German Joannas, Rafael Barousse, Leandro Casola, Guillermo Arrondo, Stefan Rammelt, Maria Eugenia Fratantoni","doi":"10.1007/s00132-024-04565-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Percutaneous Achilles tendon (AT) repair with the Dresden instrument is a safe and effective treatment for AT rupture within 15 days after injury. Follow-up includes clinical examination and imaging to assess the healing process and detect possible complications. The findings of each control visit determine the progression of the rehabilitation of each patient.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We assessed the postoperative findings of all patients who underwent AT with the Dresden technique from May 2022 to September 2023, during a follow-up period of 6 months. The study population included 40 male patients between 18 and 59 years of age. Ultrasound (US) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were performed in all patients at day 15 postoperatively and then monthly for 6 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All patients completed 6 months follow-up and 2 (5%) presented with postoperative wound dehiscence. No sural nerve lesions, reruptures, reoperations or other complications were seen. Both imaging methods showed excellent correlation of findings at all time points. Both methods were effective to assess the hematoma and structural changes of the healing process during the first 3 months. The use of US with Doppler was a useful tool to evaluate blood flow to the tendon stumps. After 3 months no significant morphological changes were observed but the US enabled a dynamic functional assessment of the tendon. After 4 months tissues showed homogenization and decrease of volume without further major changes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both US and MRI proved to be excellent methods to assess the healing process after percutaneous AT repair. The US performed by an experienced investigator showed advantages over MRI in evaluating the gap between the tendon stumps, the possibility of evaluating the vascularity with Doppler US and assessing the functionality of the healing tendon with dynamic examination, besides being a cheap and easily accessible imaging method.</p>","PeriodicalId":74375,"journal":{"name":"Orthopadie (Heidelberg, Germany)","volume":" ","pages":"731-739"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orthopadie (Heidelberg, Germany)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00132-024-04565-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Percutaneous Achilles tendon (AT) repair with the Dresden instrument is a safe and effective treatment for AT rupture within 15 days after injury. Follow-up includes clinical examination and imaging to assess the healing process and detect possible complications. The findings of each control visit determine the progression of the rehabilitation of each patient.

Methods: We assessed the postoperative findings of all patients who underwent AT with the Dresden technique from May 2022 to September 2023, during a follow-up period of 6 months. The study population included 40 male patients between 18 and 59 years of age. Ultrasound (US) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were performed in all patients at day 15 postoperatively and then monthly for 6 months.

Results: All patients completed 6 months follow-up and 2 (5%) presented with postoperative wound dehiscence. No sural nerve lesions, reruptures, reoperations or other complications were seen. Both imaging methods showed excellent correlation of findings at all time points. Both methods were effective to assess the hematoma and structural changes of the healing process during the first 3 months. The use of US with Doppler was a useful tool to evaluate blood flow to the tendon stumps. After 3 months no significant morphological changes were observed but the US enabled a dynamic functional assessment of the tendon. After 4 months tissues showed homogenization and decrease of volume without further major changes.

Conclusion: Both US and MRI proved to be excellent methods to assess the healing process after percutaneous AT repair. The US performed by an experienced investigator showed advantages over MRI in evaluating the gap between the tendon stumps, the possibility of evaluating the vascularity with Doppler US and assessing the functionality of the healing tendon with dynamic examination, besides being a cheap and easily accessible imaging method.

使用德累斯顿器械经皮修复跟腱后,超声波和磁共振成像在评估跟腱愈合中的价值。
背景:使用德累斯顿器械经皮跟腱(AT)修复术是治疗跟腱损伤后15天内断裂的一种安全有效的方法。随访包括临床检查和影像学检查,以评估愈合过程并检测可能出现的并发症。每次对照检查的结果决定了每位患者康复的进展情况:我们评估了 2022 年 5 月至 2023 年 9 月期间所有采用德累斯顿技术进行人工关节置换术的患者的术后结果,随访期为 6 个月。研究对象包括 40 名 18 至 59 岁的男性患者。所有患者均在术后第15天进行了超声波(US)和磁共振成像(MRI)检查,随后在6个月内每月进行一次检查:结果:所有患者均完成了 6 个月的随访,2 人(5%)出现术后伤口开裂。未发现鞍神经损伤、再次破裂、再次手术或其他并发症。两种成像方法在所有时间点的结果都显示出极好的相关性。两种方法都能有效评估头三个月的血肿和愈合过程中的结构变化。多普勒超声是评估肌腱残端血流的有效工具。3 个月后,未观察到明显的形态变化,但通过 US 可以对肌腱进行动态功能评估。4 个月后,组织出现均质化,体积缩小,但没有进一步的重大变化:事实证明,US 和 MRI 都是评估经皮 AT 修复术后愈合过程的绝佳方法。由经验丰富的研究人员进行的超声检查在评估肌腱残端之间的间隙、利用多普勒超声检查评估血管情况以及利用动态检查评估愈合肌腱的功能方面都比核磁共振成像有优势,此外,超声检查也是一种便宜且容易获得的成像方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信