Post-Metastasectomy Adjuvant Therapy in Patients with Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Systematic Review.

Kidney cancer (Clifton, Va.) Pub Date : 2024-08-07 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3233/KCA-240006
Steven Monda, Primo N Lara, Shuchi Gulati
{"title":"Post-Metastasectomy Adjuvant Therapy in Patients with Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Steven Monda, Primo N Lara, Shuchi Gulati","doi":"10.3233/KCA-240006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pembrolizumab is established as adjuvant therapy for patients with high-risk clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) after resection. Patients with completely resected metastatic disease (M1 NED) seem to have greater benefit from adjuvant pembrolizumab in both disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS); yet, with other agents, adjuvant therapy has not been shown to improve survival. As newer therapies evolve, it is important to understand the efficacy of systemic agents in this patient population.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We aimed to systematically review available trials investigating adjuvant therapy after metastasectomy in RCC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Following PRISMA guidelines, we performed a systematic literature search using PubMed and Embase through January 2024. For inclusion, studies were required to include completely resected patients with known metastatic RCC. Patients with only locally advanced and/or regional nodal involvement (N1) alone were excluded. Titles and abstracts were screened to identify articles for full-text, and then a descriptive review was performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 149 articles were initially identified. Ultimately 9 articles published before the end of January 2024 met our inclusion criteria and were included in the analysis. Data were extracted and organized to reflect the role of adjuvant treatment - both targeted therapies as well as immunotherapy in patients who had undergone metastasectomy and rendered M1 NED. With the exception of pembrolizumab, adjuvant therapy in M1 NED was not found to be associated with improved survival.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Pembrolizumab appears to benefit M1 NED ccRCC patients after resection even more than other high-risk ccRCC patients. Yet, this same benefit has not been seen with other agents. Future research should focus on trying to establish which M1 NED patients benefit from adjuvant treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":74039,"journal":{"name":"Kidney cancer (Clifton, Va.)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11385085/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kidney cancer (Clifton, Va.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/KCA-240006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Pembrolizumab is established as adjuvant therapy for patients with high-risk clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) after resection. Patients with completely resected metastatic disease (M1 NED) seem to have greater benefit from adjuvant pembrolizumab in both disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS); yet, with other agents, adjuvant therapy has not been shown to improve survival. As newer therapies evolve, it is important to understand the efficacy of systemic agents in this patient population.

Objective: We aimed to systematically review available trials investigating adjuvant therapy after metastasectomy in RCC.

Methods: Following PRISMA guidelines, we performed a systematic literature search using PubMed and Embase through January 2024. For inclusion, studies were required to include completely resected patients with known metastatic RCC. Patients with only locally advanced and/or regional nodal involvement (N1) alone were excluded. Titles and abstracts were screened to identify articles for full-text, and then a descriptive review was performed.

Results: A total of 149 articles were initially identified. Ultimately 9 articles published before the end of January 2024 met our inclusion criteria and were included in the analysis. Data were extracted and organized to reflect the role of adjuvant treatment - both targeted therapies as well as immunotherapy in patients who had undergone metastasectomy and rendered M1 NED. With the exception of pembrolizumab, adjuvant therapy in M1 NED was not found to be associated with improved survival.

Conclusions: Pembrolizumab appears to benefit M1 NED ccRCC patients after resection even more than other high-risk ccRCC patients. Yet, this same benefit has not been seen with other agents. Future research should focus on trying to establish which M1 NED patients benefit from adjuvant treatment.

肾细胞癌患者转移切除术后辅助治疗:系统综述
背景:Pembrolizumab已被确立为切除术后高危透明细胞肾细胞癌(ccRCC)患者的辅助治疗药物。完全切除转移性疾病(M1 NED)患者似乎在无病生存期(DFS)和总生存期(OS)方面从 Pembrolizumab 的辅助治疗中获益更大;然而,其他药物的辅助治疗并未显示出能改善生存期。随着新疗法的不断发展,了解系统性药物在这一患者群体中的疗效非常重要:我们旨在系统回顾研究 RCC 转移切除术后辅助治疗的现有试验:按照 PRISMA 指南,我们使用 PubMed 和 Embase 对截至 2024 年 1 月的文献进行了系统性检索。纳入的研究必须包括完全切除的已知转移性RCC患者。仅有局部晚期和/或区域结节受累(N1)的患者除外。对文章标题和摘要进行筛选,以确定全文文章,然后进行描述性综述:结果:最初共确定了 149 篇文章。最终,9 篇在 2024 年 1 月底之前发表的文章符合我们的纳入标准,并被纳入分析。我们对数据进行了提取和整理,以反映辅助治疗(包括靶向治疗和免疫治疗)在已接受转移灶切除术且M1 NED患者中的作用。除pembrolizumab外,M1 NED患者的辅助治疗并未发现与生存率的改善有关:结论:与其他高危 ccRCC 患者相比,Pembrolizumab 似乎更有利于切除术后的 M1 NED ccRCC 患者。然而,其他药物并未带来同样的益处。未来的研究应侧重于确定哪些 M1 NED 患者能从辅助治疗中获益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信