Physician Perspectives on the Nonclinical Factors That Contribute to Decision-Making for Advanced Prostate Cancer Care: A Qualitative Study.

JU open plus Pub Date : 2024-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-29 DOI:10.1097/ju9.0000000000000118
Deborah R Kaye, Karissa Tu, J Kelly Davis, Ada Campagna, Sharron L Docherty, Jeremy Kurnot, Tian Zhang, Daniel J George, Peter A Ubel
{"title":"Physician Perspectives on the Nonclinical Factors That Contribute to Decision-Making for Advanced Prostate Cancer Care: A Qualitative Study.","authors":"Deborah R Kaye, Karissa Tu, J Kelly Davis, Ada Campagna, Sharron L Docherty, Jeremy Kurnot, Tian Zhang, Daniel J George, Peter A Ubel","doi":"10.1097/ju9.0000000000000118","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Promising new treatments exist for advanced prostate cancer. Decision-making is complicated: there is minimal comparative effectiveness data; differing routes of administration, drug mechanisms-of-action and side effects; and significant price differences. These challenges contribute to variations in care and quality, treatment disparities, and lack of concordance with patient values. The aim of this study was to examine physician perspectives of factors influencing decision-making for first-line advanced prostate cancer treatments.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a qualitative descriptive study of physicians who treat patients with advanced prostate cancer from 09/2021-06/2022. Participants were purposively sampled from across the United States.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-seven physicians participated. We identified seventeen domains and three overarching themes affecting physician decision-making for advanced prostate cancer care. The themes were: 1) physician and practice factors impact prescribing decisions, 2) health practice resource availability affects the likelihood patients will receive the recommended treatment, and that the treatment will be in-line with patients' values and 3) patient non-clinical factors influence physician decision-making, but patient values could be better incorporated into prescribing decisions. Based upon the analyses, we constructed a preliminary framework of clinician decision-making for advanced prostate cancer.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Physicians perceive non-clinical patient, physician, and practice factors impact decision-making. These factors, therefore, must be considered when implementing programs to optimize a physician's ability to provide quality cancer care, reduce health care disparities and patient financial burden and provide patient goal-concordant care. The preliminary theoretical model of clinician decision-making for advanced prostate cancer care may also be used to inform these efforts.</p>","PeriodicalId":74033,"journal":{"name":"JU open plus","volume":"2 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11392059/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JU open plus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ju9.0000000000000118","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Promising new treatments exist for advanced prostate cancer. Decision-making is complicated: there is minimal comparative effectiveness data; differing routes of administration, drug mechanisms-of-action and side effects; and significant price differences. These challenges contribute to variations in care and quality, treatment disparities, and lack of concordance with patient values. The aim of this study was to examine physician perspectives of factors influencing decision-making for first-line advanced prostate cancer treatments.

Methods: We conducted a qualitative descriptive study of physicians who treat patients with advanced prostate cancer from 09/2021-06/2022. Participants were purposively sampled from across the United States.

Results: Twenty-seven physicians participated. We identified seventeen domains and three overarching themes affecting physician decision-making for advanced prostate cancer care. The themes were: 1) physician and practice factors impact prescribing decisions, 2) health practice resource availability affects the likelihood patients will receive the recommended treatment, and that the treatment will be in-line with patients' values and 3) patient non-clinical factors influence physician decision-making, but patient values could be better incorporated into prescribing decisions. Based upon the analyses, we constructed a preliminary framework of clinician decision-making for advanced prostate cancer.

Conclusions: Physicians perceive non-clinical patient, physician, and practice factors impact decision-making. These factors, therefore, must be considered when implementing programs to optimize a physician's ability to provide quality cancer care, reduce health care disparities and patient financial burden and provide patient goal-concordant care. The preliminary theoretical model of clinician decision-making for advanced prostate cancer care may also be used to inform these efforts.

医生对有助于晚期前列腺癌治疗决策的非临床因素的看法:定性研究。
前言晚期前列腺癌的新疗法前景广阔。决策过程十分复杂:比较疗效数据极少;给药途径、药物作用机制和副作用各不相同;价格差异巨大。这些挑战导致了护理和质量的差异、治疗差异以及与患者价值观的不一致。本研究旨在考察医生对影响一线晚期前列腺癌治疗决策的因素的看法:我们在 2021 年 9 月至 2022 年 6 月期间对治疗晚期前列腺癌患者的医生进行了一项定性描述性研究。结果:27 名医生参与了研究:结果:27 名医生参与了研究。我们确定了影响医生晚期前列腺癌治疗决策的十七个领域和三个总体主题。这些主题是1)医生和实践因素影响处方决策;2)医疗实践资源的可用性影响患者接受推荐治疗的可能性,以及治疗是否符合患者的价值观;3)患者的非临床因素影响医生的决策,但患者的价值观可以更好地融入处方决策中。根据分析结果,我们构建了晚期前列腺癌临床医生决策的初步框架:结论:医生认为患者、医生和临床实践等非临床因素会影响决策。因此,在实施计划以优化医生提供优质癌症治疗、减少医疗差距和患者经济负担以及提供与患者目标一致的治疗时,必须考虑这些因素。临床医生晚期前列腺癌治疗决策的初步理论模型也可为这些工作提供参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信