Supporting Technologies for COVID-19 Prevention: Systemized Review.

JMIRx med Pub Date : 2022-05-24 eCollection Date: 2022-04-01 DOI:10.2196/30344
Zhuo Zhao, Rui Li, Yangmyung Ma, Iman Islam, Abdul M Azam Rajper, WenZhan Song, Hongliang Ren, Zion Tsz Ho Tse
{"title":"Supporting Technologies for COVID-19 Prevention: Systemized Review.","authors":"Zhuo Zhao, Rui Li, Yangmyung Ma, Iman Islam, Abdul M Azam Rajper, WenZhan Song, Hongliang Ren, Zion Tsz Ho Tse","doi":"10.2196/30344","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>During COVID-19, clinical and health care demands have been on the rapid rise. Major challenges that have arisen during the pandemic have included a lack of testing kits, shortages of ventilators to treat severe cases of COVID-19, and insufficient accessibility to personal protective equipment for both hospitals and the public. New technologies have been developed by scientists, researchers, and companies in response to these demands.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The primary objective of this review is to compare different supporting technologies in the subjugation of the COVID-19 spread.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this paper, 150 news articles and scientific reports on COVID-19-related innovations during 2020-2021 were checked, screened, and shortlisted to yield a total of 23 articles for review. The keywords \"COVID-19 technology,\" \"COVID-19 invention,\" and \"COVID-19 equipment\" were used in a Google search to generate related news articles and scientific reports. The search was performed on February 1, 2021. These were then categorized into three sections, which are personal protective equipment (PPE), testing methods, and medical treatments. Each study was analyzed for its engineering characteristics and potential social impact on the COVID-19 pandemic.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 9 articles were selected for review concerning PPE. In general, the design and fabrication of PPE were moving toward the direction of additive manufacturing and intelligent information feedback while being eco-friendly. Moreover, 8 articles were selected for reviewing testing methods within the two main categories of molecular and antigen tests. All the inventions endeavored to increase sensitivity while reducing the turnaround time. However, the inventions reported in this review paper were not sufficiently tested for their safety and efficiency. Most of the inventions are temporary solutions intended to be used only during shortages of medical resources. Finally, 6 articles were selected for the review of COVID-19 medical treatment. The major challenge identified was the uncertainty in applying novel ideas to speed up the production of ventilators.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The technologies developed during the COVID-19 pandemic were considered for review. In order to better respond to future pandemics, national reserves of critical medical supplies should be increased to improve preparation. This pandemic has also highlighted the need for the automation and optimization of medical manufacturing.</p>","PeriodicalId":73558,"journal":{"name":"JMIRx med","volume":"3 2","pages":"e30344"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9168838/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIRx med","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/30344","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/4/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: During COVID-19, clinical and health care demands have been on the rapid rise. Major challenges that have arisen during the pandemic have included a lack of testing kits, shortages of ventilators to treat severe cases of COVID-19, and insufficient accessibility to personal protective equipment for both hospitals and the public. New technologies have been developed by scientists, researchers, and companies in response to these demands.

Objective: The primary objective of this review is to compare different supporting technologies in the subjugation of the COVID-19 spread.

Methods: In this paper, 150 news articles and scientific reports on COVID-19-related innovations during 2020-2021 were checked, screened, and shortlisted to yield a total of 23 articles for review. The keywords "COVID-19 technology," "COVID-19 invention," and "COVID-19 equipment" were used in a Google search to generate related news articles and scientific reports. The search was performed on February 1, 2021. These were then categorized into three sections, which are personal protective equipment (PPE), testing methods, and medical treatments. Each study was analyzed for its engineering characteristics and potential social impact on the COVID-19 pandemic.

Results: A total of 9 articles were selected for review concerning PPE. In general, the design and fabrication of PPE were moving toward the direction of additive manufacturing and intelligent information feedback while being eco-friendly. Moreover, 8 articles were selected for reviewing testing methods within the two main categories of molecular and antigen tests. All the inventions endeavored to increase sensitivity while reducing the turnaround time. However, the inventions reported in this review paper were not sufficiently tested for their safety and efficiency. Most of the inventions are temporary solutions intended to be used only during shortages of medical resources. Finally, 6 articles were selected for the review of COVID-19 medical treatment. The major challenge identified was the uncertainty in applying novel ideas to speed up the production of ventilators.

Conclusions: The technologies developed during the COVID-19 pandemic were considered for review. In order to better respond to future pandemics, national reserves of critical medical supplies should be increased to improve preparation. This pandemic has also highlighted the need for the automation and optimization of medical manufacturing.

预防 COVID-19 的辅助技术:系统化审查。
背景:在 COVID-19 期间,临床和医疗保健需求急剧上升。大流行期间出现的主要挑战包括缺乏检测试剂盒、治疗 COVID-19 重症病例的呼吸机短缺以及医院和公众无法获得足够的个人防护设备。为满足这些需求,科学家、研究人员和公司开发了新技术:本综述的主要目的是对抑制 COVID-19 传播的不同辅助技术进行比较:本文对 2020-2021 年间有关 COVID-19 相关创新的 150 篇新闻报道和科学报告进行了检查、筛选和短名单筛选,共筛选出 23 篇文章进行综述。在谷歌搜索中使用了 "COVID-19 技术"、"COVID-19 发明 "和 "COVID-19 设备 "等关键词,以生成相关的新闻报道和科学报告。搜索时间为 2021 年 2 月 1 日。然后将这些文章分为三个部分,即个人防护设备 (PPE)、测试方法和医疗方法。对每项研究的工程特点和对 COVID-19 大流行的潜在社会影响进行了分析:共选取了 9 篇有关个人防护设备的文章进行审查。总体而言,个人防护设备的设计和制造正朝着增材制造和智能信息反馈的方向发展,同时兼顾环保。此外,还选取了 8 篇文章对分子检测和抗原检测两大类检测方法进行评述。所有发明都致力于提高灵敏度,同时缩短周转时间。然而,本综述论文中报告的发明并未对其安全性和效率进行充分测试。大多数发明都是临时解决方案,只打算在医疗资源短缺时使用。最后,有 6 篇文章被选作 COVID-19 医疗的综述。发现的主要挑战是在应用新想法加快呼吸机生产方面存在不确定性:我们对 COVID-19 大流行期间开发的技术进行了审查。为了更好地应对未来的大流行病,应增加国家关键医疗用品的储备,以改进准备工作。这次大流行还凸显了医疗制造自动化和优化的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信