Preparation for implementation of evidence-based practices in urban schools: A shared process with implementing partners.

Implementation research and practice Pub Date : 2024-09-09 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1177/26334895241279503
Ricardo Eiraldi, Rachel Comly, Courtney Benjamin Wolk, Quinn Rabenau-McDonnell, Barry L McCurdy, Muniya S Khanna, Abbas F Jawad, Jayme Banks, Stacina Clark, Kristina M Popkin, Tara Wilson, Kathryn Henson
{"title":"Preparation for implementation of evidence-based practices in urban schools: A shared process with implementing partners.","authors":"Ricardo Eiraldi, Rachel Comly, Courtney Benjamin Wolk, Quinn Rabenau-McDonnell, Barry L McCurdy, Muniya S Khanna, Abbas F Jawad, Jayme Banks, Stacina Clark, Kristina M Popkin, Tara Wilson, Kathryn Henson","doi":"10.1177/26334895241279503","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Shifting organizational priorities can negatively affect the sustainment of innovations in community settings. Shifting priorities can present barriers to conducting clinical research in schools if a misalignment occurs between school district priorities and the aims of the study. Often this misalignment occurs due to a shift during the period between when the study is submitted for funding and when research activities begin. Participatory research approaches can be employed to restore alignment between study processes and school district priorities. The purpose of the study is to describe data from a shared process with district partners. The shared process resulted in modifications to the main study's implementation processes and strategies in order to restore alignment with evolving school priorities while remaining faithful to the aims of the study.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Data originated from qualitative interviews conducted with 20 school district and school personnel in a large urban school district. Qualitative themes were organized into categories based on a social-ecological school implementation framework. Data from team meetings, meetings with school district administrators, and emails served to supplement and verify findings from interview analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Themes included barriers and facilitators at the macro-, school-, individual-, team-, and implementation quality levels. Adaptations were made to address barriers and facilitators and restore alignment with school district priorities. Most adaptations to study processes and implementation strategies focused on re-training and providing more information to school district coaches and school-based staff. New procedures were created, and resources were re-allocated for the larger study.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Findings were discussed in relation to the implementation literature in schools. Recommendations for sustaining strong collaboration among researchers and school partners are provided.</p>","PeriodicalId":73354,"journal":{"name":"Implementation research and practice","volume":"5 ","pages":"26334895241279503"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11384528/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Implementation research and practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/26334895241279503","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Shifting organizational priorities can negatively affect the sustainment of innovations in community settings. Shifting priorities can present barriers to conducting clinical research in schools if a misalignment occurs between school district priorities and the aims of the study. Often this misalignment occurs due to a shift during the period between when the study is submitted for funding and when research activities begin. Participatory research approaches can be employed to restore alignment between study processes and school district priorities. The purpose of the study is to describe data from a shared process with district partners. The shared process resulted in modifications to the main study's implementation processes and strategies in order to restore alignment with evolving school priorities while remaining faithful to the aims of the study.

Method: Data originated from qualitative interviews conducted with 20 school district and school personnel in a large urban school district. Qualitative themes were organized into categories based on a social-ecological school implementation framework. Data from team meetings, meetings with school district administrators, and emails served to supplement and verify findings from interview analyses.

Results: Themes included barriers and facilitators at the macro-, school-, individual-, team-, and implementation quality levels. Adaptations were made to address barriers and facilitators and restore alignment with school district priorities. Most adaptations to study processes and implementation strategies focused on re-training and providing more information to school district coaches and school-based staff. New procedures were created, and resources were re-allocated for the larger study.

Conclusions: Findings were discussed in relation to the implementation literature in schools. Recommendations for sustaining strong collaboration among researchers and school partners are provided.

为在城市学校实施循证实践做好准备:与实施伙伴共享的过程。
背景:组织优先事项的变化会对社区环境中创新的持续性产生负面影响。如果校区的优先事项与研究目标不一致,优先事项的变化可能会阻碍在学校开展临床研究。这种错位通常是由于从提交研究申请到开始研究活动这段时间内发生的变化造成的。参与式研究方法可用于恢复研究过程与校区优先事项之间的一致性。本研究的目的是描述与学区合作伙伴共享过程的数据。通过共享过程,对主要研究的实施过程和策略进行了修改,以便在忠实于研究目标的同时,与不断变化的学校优先事项恢复一致:数据来源于对一个大型城市学区的 20 名学区和学校工作人员进行的定性访谈。定性主题根据社会生态学校实施框架进行分类。来自团队会议、与校区管理人员的会议以及电子邮件的数据对访谈分析结果进行了补充和验证:主题包括宏观、学校、个人、团队和实施质量层面的障碍和促进因素。针对障碍和促进因素进行了调整,使其与学区的优先事项保持一致。对研究过程和实施策略的大多数调整都集中在对校区教练和学校教职员工的再培训和提供更多信息上。还制定了新的程序,并为更大规模的研究重新分配了资源:结合学校实施文献对研究结果进行了讨论。结论:结合学校实施方面的文献对研究结果进行了讨论,并就研究人员与学校合作伙伴之间保持密切合作提出了建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
18 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信