Quality of interaction between clinicians and artificial intelligence systems. A systematic review.

Future healthcare journal Pub Date : 2024-08-17 eCollection Date: 2024-09-01 DOI:10.1016/j.fhj.2024.100172
Argyrios Perivolaris, Chris Adams-McGavin, Yasmine Madan, Teruko Kishibe, Tony Antoniou, Muhammad Mamdani, James J Jung
{"title":"Quality of interaction between clinicians and artificial intelligence systems. A systematic review.","authors":"Argyrios Perivolaris, Chris Adams-McGavin, Yasmine Madan, Teruko Kishibe, Tony Antoniou, Muhammad Mamdani, James J Jung","doi":"10.1016/j.fhj.2024.100172","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Artificial intelligence (AI) has the potential to improve healthcare quality when thoughtfully integrated into clinical practice. Current evaluations of AI solutions tend to focus solely on model performance. There is a critical knowledge gap in the assessment of AI-clinician interactions. We systematically reviewed existing literature to identify interaction traits that can be used to assess the quality of AI-clinician interactions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a systematic review of published studies to June 2022 that reported elements of interactions that impacted the relationship between clinicians and AI-enabled clinical decision support systems. Due to study heterogeneity, we conducted a narrative synthesis of the different interaction traits identified from this review. Two study authors categorised the AI-clinician interaction traits based on their shared constructs independently. After the independent categorisation, both authors engaged in a discussion to finalise the categories.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From 34 included studies, we identified 210 interaction traits. The most common interaction traits included usefulness, ease of use, trust, satisfaction, willingness to use and usability. After removing duplicate or redundant traits, 90 unique interaction traits were identified. Unique interaction traits were then classified into seven categories: usability and user experience, system performance, clinician trust and acceptance, impact on patient care, communication, ethical and professional concerns, and clinician engagement and workflow.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>We identified seven categories of interaction traits between clinicians and AI systems. The proposed categories may serve as a foundation for a framework assessing the quality of AI-clinician interactions.</p>","PeriodicalId":73125,"journal":{"name":"Future healthcare journal","volume":"11 3","pages":"100172"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11399614/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Future healthcare journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fhj.2024.100172","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Artificial intelligence (AI) has the potential to improve healthcare quality when thoughtfully integrated into clinical practice. Current evaluations of AI solutions tend to focus solely on model performance. There is a critical knowledge gap in the assessment of AI-clinician interactions. We systematically reviewed existing literature to identify interaction traits that can be used to assess the quality of AI-clinician interactions.

Methods: We performed a systematic review of published studies to June 2022 that reported elements of interactions that impacted the relationship between clinicians and AI-enabled clinical decision support systems. Due to study heterogeneity, we conducted a narrative synthesis of the different interaction traits identified from this review. Two study authors categorised the AI-clinician interaction traits based on their shared constructs independently. After the independent categorisation, both authors engaged in a discussion to finalise the categories.

Results: From 34 included studies, we identified 210 interaction traits. The most common interaction traits included usefulness, ease of use, trust, satisfaction, willingness to use and usability. After removing duplicate or redundant traits, 90 unique interaction traits were identified. Unique interaction traits were then classified into seven categories: usability and user experience, system performance, clinician trust and acceptance, impact on patient care, communication, ethical and professional concerns, and clinician engagement and workflow.

Discussion: We identified seven categories of interaction traits between clinicians and AI systems. The proposed categories may serve as a foundation for a framework assessing the quality of AI-clinician interactions.

临床医生与人工智能系统之间互动的质量。系统综述。
导言:人工智能(AI)如果能与临床实践相结合,就有可能提高医疗质量。目前对人工智能解决方案的评估往往只关注模型性能。在评估人工智能与医生的互动方面存在着严重的知识空白。我们系统回顾了现有文献,以确定可用于评估人工智能与医生互动质量的互动特征:我们对截至 2022 年 6 月已发表的研究进行了系统回顾,这些研究报告了影响临床医生与人工智能临床决策支持系统之间关系的交互要素。由于研究的异质性,我们对综述中发现的不同交互特征进行了叙述性综合。两位研究作者根据人工智能与临床医生互动的共同特征进行了独立分类。独立分类后,两位作者进行了讨论,最终确定了分类结果:从 34 项纳入的研究中,我们确定了 210 个交互特征。最常见的交互特征包括有用性、易用性、信任度、满意度、使用意愿和可用性。在去除重复或多余的特质后,我们确定了 90 个独特的交互特质。然后将独特的交互特征分为七类:可用性和用户体验、系统性能、临床医生的信任度和接受度、对患者护理的影响、沟通、伦理和专业问题以及临床医生的参与度和工作流程:讨论:我们确定了临床医生与人工智能系统之间交互特征的七个类别。讨论:我们确定了临床医生与人工智能系统之间互动特征的七个类别,所提出的类别可作为评估人工智能与临床医生互动质量框架的基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信