Strategic insights from a Delphi study: enhancing employment for multiply marginalized people with disabilities.

IF 1.3 Q3 REHABILITATION
Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences Pub Date : 2024-09-04 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fresc.2024.1443302
Kelsey S Goddard, Noelle K Kurth, Jean P Hall, Lyndsie M Koon, Corey L Moore, Kacie R Dentleegrand
{"title":"Strategic insights from a Delphi study: enhancing employment for multiply marginalized people with disabilities.","authors":"Kelsey S Goddard, Noelle K Kurth, Jean P Hall, Lyndsie M Koon, Corey L Moore, Kacie R Dentleegrand","doi":"10.3389/fresc.2024.1443302","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The employment landscape for multiply marginalized people with disabilities presents significant challenges, exacerbated by intersecting identities such as race/ethnicity, sexual orientation, gender identity, poverty, and geography. Recent studies highlight the compounded employment disparities faced by this group, including discriminatory hiring practices, inadequate accommodations, and uneven gains in employment during the COVID-19 public health emergency.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Our study employed a three-round Delphi process with 20 diverse experts across 14 states across the United States (U.S.) to formulate recommendations for improving employment experiences for multiply marginalized people with disabilities. The panel's insights were gathered through surveys administered online, with each round designed to refine the collective recommendations. This iterative process aimed to build a consensus on the most effective policy and practice recommendations for improving employment outcomes within this population.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Delphi study identified key areas for strategic focus, including emergency preparedness, education and training, transportation, assistive technology, workplace accommodations, and combating discrimination and stigma. Notable recommendations included improving emergency preparedness training, enhancing employment education, increasing funding for accessible transportation and assistive technology, and promoting inclusive hiring practices. The study also emphasized the need for policies supporting telework and simplifying disability-related benefits.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The findings highlight the critical role of tailored strategies to address employment challenges faced by people with disabilities from marginalized communities. Meaningfully and fully implementing these recommendations would create a more inclusive environment that improves employment outcomes for multiply marginalized people with disabilities.</p>","PeriodicalId":73102,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11408470/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fresc.2024.1443302","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The employment landscape for multiply marginalized people with disabilities presents significant challenges, exacerbated by intersecting identities such as race/ethnicity, sexual orientation, gender identity, poverty, and geography. Recent studies highlight the compounded employment disparities faced by this group, including discriminatory hiring practices, inadequate accommodations, and uneven gains in employment during the COVID-19 public health emergency.

Methods: Our study employed a three-round Delphi process with 20 diverse experts across 14 states across the United States (U.S.) to formulate recommendations for improving employment experiences for multiply marginalized people with disabilities. The panel's insights were gathered through surveys administered online, with each round designed to refine the collective recommendations. This iterative process aimed to build a consensus on the most effective policy and practice recommendations for improving employment outcomes within this population.

Results: The Delphi study identified key areas for strategic focus, including emergency preparedness, education and training, transportation, assistive technology, workplace accommodations, and combating discrimination and stigma. Notable recommendations included improving emergency preparedness training, enhancing employment education, increasing funding for accessible transportation and assistive technology, and promoting inclusive hiring practices. The study also emphasized the need for policies supporting telework and simplifying disability-related benefits.

Discussion: The findings highlight the critical role of tailored strategies to address employment challenges faced by people with disabilities from marginalized communities. Meaningfully and fully implementing these recommendations would create a more inclusive environment that improves employment outcomes for multiply marginalized people with disabilities.

德尔菲研究的战略启示:提高多重边缘化残疾人的就业率。
导言:多重边缘化的残障人士面临着巨大的就业挑战,而种族/民族、性取向、性别认同、贫困和地理位置等多重身份又加剧了这一挑战。最近的研究凸显了这一群体所面临的复杂的就业不平等问题,包括歧视性的雇佣做法、不适当的便利措施以及在 COVID-19 公共卫生紧急事件期间就业方面的不均衡收益:我们的研究采用了三轮德尔菲程序,邀请美国 14 个州的 20 位不同领域的专家参与,为改善多重边缘化残疾人的就业体验提出建议。专家小组通过在线调查收集意见,每轮调查都旨在完善集体建议。这一迭代过程旨在就最有效的政策和实践建议达成共识,以改善这一人群的就业成果:德尔菲研究确定了战略重点的关键领域,包括应急准备、教育和培训、交通、辅助技术、工作场所便利以及消除歧视和羞辱。值得注意的建议包括改进应急准备培训、加强就业教育、增加对无障碍交通和辅助技术的资金投入,以及推广包容性的招聘做法。研究还强调,需要制定支持远程工作和简化残疾相关福利的政策:讨论:研究结果凸显了量身定制的战略在解决边缘化社区残疾人面临的就业挑战方面的关键作用。有意义地全面实施这些建议将创造一个更具包容性的环境,从而改善多重边缘化残疾人的就业成果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信