Feasibility and tolerability of anlotinib plus PD-1 blockades as rechallenge immunotherapy in previously treated advanced ESCC: a retrospective study.

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Oncologist Pub Date : 2025-03-10 DOI:10.1093/oncolo/oyae245
Yonggui Hong, Jun Liu, Ping Lu, Zhiwei Chang, Guifang Zhang, Xiumei Ma, Wei Liang, Yongjing Tian, Jin Xia, Heng Cao, Jing Huang
{"title":"Feasibility and tolerability of anlotinib plus PD-1 blockades as rechallenge immunotherapy in previously treated advanced ESCC: a retrospective study.","authors":"Yonggui Hong, Jun Liu, Ping Lu, Zhiwei Chang, Guifang Zhang, Xiumei Ma, Wei Liang, Yongjing Tian, Jin Xia, Heng Cao, Jing Huang","doi":"10.1093/oncolo/oyae245","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Rechallenge with immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) seemed favorable in several tumors, but clinical experience on esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) was scanty. This real-world study aimed to assess the feasibility and safety of anlotinib plus ICI for patients with previously ICI-treated advanced ESCC.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We retrospectively identified advanced ESCC patients who received anlotinib plus ICI in the rechallenge setting for evaluation of clinical outcomes and safety. Totally 110 ICI-pretreated patients, of which 89 (80.9%) received prior first- or second-line treatment, were included from September 9, 2019, to November 30, 2022. Most patients (63.6%) discontinued initial ICI due to disease progression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After rechallenge, median overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were 11.1 (95% CI, 8.6-13.7) and 5.6 (95% CI, 4.4-6.8) months, respectively; estimated OS and PFS rates at 12 months were 47.6% (95% CI, 36.8%-57.7%) and 21.4% (95% CI, 10.9%-34.2%), respectively. No complete response was reported and 21 (19.1%) patients attained partial response; the objective response rate was 19.1%. Fifty-five (50.0%) had stable disease for a disease control rate of 69.1%. Of the 21 responders, median duration of response was 6.4 months. Tendencies for longer OS were observed in patients with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance of 0 (P = .056). The incidence of grade 3 or higher treatment-related adverse events was 10.0%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Anlotinib plus ICI in the rechallenge setting was promising and resulted in encouraging benefits for patients with previously ICI-treated advanced ESCC. Our findings provided preliminary but unique evidence to help select ESCC patients benefiting from this strategy.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>chictr.org.cn; number ChiCTR2300070777.</p>","PeriodicalId":54686,"journal":{"name":"Oncologist","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11954505/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oncologist","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oncolo/oyae245","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Rechallenge with immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) seemed favorable in several tumors, but clinical experience on esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) was scanty. This real-world study aimed to assess the feasibility and safety of anlotinib plus ICI for patients with previously ICI-treated advanced ESCC.

Materials and methods: We retrospectively identified advanced ESCC patients who received anlotinib plus ICI in the rechallenge setting for evaluation of clinical outcomes and safety. Totally 110 ICI-pretreated patients, of which 89 (80.9%) received prior first- or second-line treatment, were included from September 9, 2019, to November 30, 2022. Most patients (63.6%) discontinued initial ICI due to disease progression.

Results: After rechallenge, median overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were 11.1 (95% CI, 8.6-13.7) and 5.6 (95% CI, 4.4-6.8) months, respectively; estimated OS and PFS rates at 12 months were 47.6% (95% CI, 36.8%-57.7%) and 21.4% (95% CI, 10.9%-34.2%), respectively. No complete response was reported and 21 (19.1%) patients attained partial response; the objective response rate was 19.1%. Fifty-five (50.0%) had stable disease for a disease control rate of 69.1%. Of the 21 responders, median duration of response was 6.4 months. Tendencies for longer OS were observed in patients with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance of 0 (P = .056). The incidence of grade 3 or higher treatment-related adverse events was 10.0%.

Conclusion: Anlotinib plus ICI in the rechallenge setting was promising and resulted in encouraging benefits for patients with previously ICI-treated advanced ESCC. Our findings provided preliminary but unique evidence to help select ESCC patients benefiting from this strategy.

Trial registration: chictr.org.cn; number ChiCTR2300070777.

安罗替尼加 PD-1 阻断剂作为再挑战免疫疗法治疗既往治疗过的晚期 ESCC 的可行性和耐受性:一项回顾性研究。
背景:重新挑战免疫检查点抑制剂(ICI)似乎对多种肿瘤有利,但食管鳞状细胞癌(ESCC)的临床经验却很少。这项真实世界研究旨在评估安罗替尼加ICI治疗既往接受过ICI治疗的晚期ESCC患者的可行性和安全性:我们回顾性地确定了接受安罗替尼加 ICI 再治疗的晚期 ESCC 患者,以评估其临床结果和安全性。从2019年9月9日到2022年11月30日,共纳入了110例ICI再治疗患者,其中89例(80.9%)之前接受过一线或二线治疗。大多数患者(63.6%)因疾病进展而停止初始 ICI 治疗:重新挑战后,中位总生存期(OS)和无进展生存期(PFS)分别为11.1(95% CI,8.6-13.7)个月和5.6(95% CI,4.4-6.8)个月;12个月时的估计OS和PFS率分别为47.6%(95% CI,36.8%-57.7%)和21.4%(95% CI,10.9%-34.2%)。无完全应答报告,21 例(19.1%)患者获得部分应答;客观应答率为 19.1%。55名患者(50.0%)病情稳定,疾病控制率为69.1%。在 21 名应答者中,中位应答持续时间为 6.4 个月。东部合作肿瘤学组表现为 0 的患者的 OS 有延长的趋势(P = .056)。3级或以上治疗相关不良事件的发生率为10.0%:结论:安罗替尼加 ICI 在再挑战中的治疗效果很好,为既往接受过 ICI 治疗的晚期 ESCC 患者带来了令人鼓舞的益处。我们的研究结果提供了初步但独特的证据,有助于选择从这一策略中获益的ESCC患者。试验注册:Chictr.org.cn;编号:ChiCTR2300070777。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Oncologist
Oncologist 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
10.40
自引率
3.40%
发文量
309
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Oncologist® is dedicated to translating the latest research developments into the best multidimensional care for cancer patients. Thus, The Oncologist is committed to helping physicians excel in this ever-expanding environment through the publication of timely reviews, original studies, and commentaries on important developments. We believe that the practice of oncology requires both an understanding of a range of disciplines encompassing basic science related to cancer, translational research, and clinical practice, but also the socioeconomic and psychosocial factors that determine access to care and quality of life and function following cancer treatment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信