A Machine Learning Method for Allocating Scarce COVID-19 Monoclonal Antibodies.

IF 9.5 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Mengli Xiao, Kyle C Molina, Neil R Aggarwal, Laurel E Beaty, Tellen D Bennett, Nichole E Carlson, Lindsey E Fish, Mika K Hamer, Bethany M Kwan, David A Mayer, Jennifer L Peers, Matthew K Wynia, Adit A Ginde
{"title":"A Machine Learning Method for Allocating Scarce COVID-19 Monoclonal Antibodies.","authors":"Mengli Xiao, Kyle C Molina, Neil R Aggarwal, Laurel E Beaty, Tellen D Bennett, Nichole E Carlson, Lindsey E Fish, Mika K Hamer, Bethany M Kwan, David A Mayer, Jennifer L Peers, Matthew K Wynia, Adit A Ginde","doi":"10.1001/jamahealthforum.2024.2884","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>During the COVID-19 pandemic, the effective distribution of limited treatments became a crucial policy goal. Yet, limited research exists using electronic health record data and machine learning techniques, such as policy learning trees (PLTs), to optimize the distribution of scarce therapeutics.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate whether a machine learning PLT-based method of scarce resource allocation optimizes the treatment benefit of COVID-19 neutralizing monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) during periods of resource constraint.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>This retrospective cohort study used electronic health record data from October 1, 2021, to December 11, 2021, for the training cohort and data from June 1, 2021, to October 1, 2021, for the testing cohort. The cohorts included patients who had positive test results for SARS-CoV-2 and qualified for COVID-19 mAb therapy based on the US Food and Drug Administration's emergency use authorization criteria, ascertained from the patient electronic health record. Only some of the qualifying candidates received treatment with mAbs. Data were analyzed between from January 2023 to May 2024.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>The primary outcome was overall expected hospitalization, assessed as the potential reduction in overall expected hospitalization if the PLT-based allocation system was used. This was compared to observed allocation using risk differences.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 9542 eligible patients in the training cohort (5418 female [56.8%]; age distribution: 18-44 years, 4151 [43.5%]; 45-64 years, 3146 [33.0%]; and ≥65 years, 2245 [23.5%]), a total of 3862 (40.5%) received mAbs. Among 6248 eligible patients in the testing cohort (3416 female [54.7%]; age distribution: 18-44 years, 2827 [45.2%]; 45-64 years, 1927 [30.8%]; and ≥65 years, 1494 [23.9%]), a total of 1329 (21.3%) received mAbs. Treatment allocation using the trained PLT model led to an estimated 1.6% reduction (95% CI, -2.0% to -1.2%) in overall expected hospitalization compared to observed treatment allocation in the testing cohort. The visual assessment showed that the PLT-based point system had a larger reduction in 28-day hospitalization compared with the Monoclonal Antibody Screening Score (maximum overall hospitalization difference, -1.0% [95% CI, -1.3% to -0.7%]) in the testing cohort.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>This retrospective cohort study proposes and tests a PLT method, which can be linked to a electronic health record data platform to improve real-time allocation of scarce treatments. Use of this PLT-based allocation method would have likely resulted in fewer hospitalizations across a population than were observed in usual care, with greater expected reductions than a commonly used point system.</p>","PeriodicalId":53180,"journal":{"name":"JAMA Health Forum","volume":"5 9","pages":"e242884"},"PeriodicalIF":9.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11400220/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA Health Forum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamahealthforum.2024.2884","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance: During the COVID-19 pandemic, the effective distribution of limited treatments became a crucial policy goal. Yet, limited research exists using electronic health record data and machine learning techniques, such as policy learning trees (PLTs), to optimize the distribution of scarce therapeutics.

Objective: To evaluate whether a machine learning PLT-based method of scarce resource allocation optimizes the treatment benefit of COVID-19 neutralizing monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) during periods of resource constraint.

Design, setting, and participants: This retrospective cohort study used electronic health record data from October 1, 2021, to December 11, 2021, for the training cohort and data from June 1, 2021, to October 1, 2021, for the testing cohort. The cohorts included patients who had positive test results for SARS-CoV-2 and qualified for COVID-19 mAb therapy based on the US Food and Drug Administration's emergency use authorization criteria, ascertained from the patient electronic health record. Only some of the qualifying candidates received treatment with mAbs. Data were analyzed between from January 2023 to May 2024.

Main outcomes and measures: The primary outcome was overall expected hospitalization, assessed as the potential reduction in overall expected hospitalization if the PLT-based allocation system was used. This was compared to observed allocation using risk differences.

Results: Among 9542 eligible patients in the training cohort (5418 female [56.8%]; age distribution: 18-44 years, 4151 [43.5%]; 45-64 years, 3146 [33.0%]; and ≥65 years, 2245 [23.5%]), a total of 3862 (40.5%) received mAbs. Among 6248 eligible patients in the testing cohort (3416 female [54.7%]; age distribution: 18-44 years, 2827 [45.2%]; 45-64 years, 1927 [30.8%]; and ≥65 years, 1494 [23.9%]), a total of 1329 (21.3%) received mAbs. Treatment allocation using the trained PLT model led to an estimated 1.6% reduction (95% CI, -2.0% to -1.2%) in overall expected hospitalization compared to observed treatment allocation in the testing cohort. The visual assessment showed that the PLT-based point system had a larger reduction in 28-day hospitalization compared with the Monoclonal Antibody Screening Score (maximum overall hospitalization difference, -1.0% [95% CI, -1.3% to -0.7%]) in the testing cohort.

Conclusions and relevance: This retrospective cohort study proposes and tests a PLT method, which can be linked to a electronic health record data platform to improve real-time allocation of scarce treatments. Use of this PLT-based allocation method would have likely resulted in fewer hospitalizations across a population than were observed in usual care, with greater expected reductions than a commonly used point system.

分配稀缺 COVID-19 单克隆抗体的机器学习方法。
重要性:在 COVID-19 大流行期间,有效分配有限的治疗药物成为一项重要的政策目标。然而,利用电子健康记录数据和机器学习技术(如策略学习树(PLT))来优化稀缺治疗药物分配的研究还很有限:评估基于机器学习政策学习树的稀缺资源分配方法能否在资源紧张时期优化 COVID-19 中和单克隆抗体(mAbs)的治疗效果:这项回顾性队列研究使用了 2021 年 10 月 1 日至 2021 年 12 月 11 日的电子健康记录数据作为训练队列,使用了 2021 年 6 月 1 日至 2021 年 10 月 1 日的数据作为测试队列。这些队列包括SARS-CoV-2检测结果呈阳性的患者,根据美国食品药品管理局的紧急使用授权标准,这些患者符合接受COVID-19 mAb治疗的条件,而这些标准是通过患者的电子健康记录确定的。只有部分符合条件的患者接受了 mAb 治疗。数据分析时间为 2023 年 1 月至 2024 年 5 月:主要结果是总体预期住院时间,即如果使用基于 PLT 的分配系统,总体预期住院时间的潜在减少量。采用风险差异法将其与观察到的分配情况进行比较:在培训队列的 9542 名合格患者中(5418 名女性[56.8%];年龄分布为 18-44 岁,4151 名女性[56.818-44岁,4151人[43.5%];45-64岁,3146人[33.0%];≥65岁,2245人[23.5%])中,共有3862人(40.5%)接受了mAbs治疗。在 6248 名符合条件的患者中(3416 名女性[54.7%];年龄分布:18-44 岁,2827 名[54.7%];≥65 岁,2245 名[23.5%]),共有 3862 人(40.5%)接受了 mAbs:18-44岁,2827人[45.2%];45-64岁,1927人[30.8%];≥65岁,1494人[23.9%])中,共有1329人(21.3%)接受了mAbs治疗。与测试队列中观察到的治疗分配相比,使用训练有素的 PLT 模型进行治疗分配估计可使总体预期住院率降低 1.6%(95% CI,-2.0% 至-1.2%)。直观评估显示,与单克隆抗体筛查评分相比,基于 PLT 的评分系统在测试队列中的 28 天住院率降低幅度更大(总体住院率最大差异为-1.0% [95% CI, -1.3% to -0.7%]):这项回顾性队列研究提出并测试了一种 PLT 方法,该方法可与电子健康记录数据平台连接,以改善稀缺治疗的实时分配。使用这种基于PLT的分配方法很可能会使整个人群的住院人数少于在常规护理中观察到的住院人数,与常用的积分系统相比,预期的减少幅度更大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
7.80%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: JAMA Health Forum is an international, peer-reviewed, online, open access journal that addresses health policy and strategies affecting medicine, health, and health care. The journal publishes original research, evidence-based reports, and opinion about national and global health policy. It covers innovative approaches to health care delivery and health care economics, access, quality, safety, equity, and reform. In addition to publishing articles, JAMA Health Forum also features commentary from health policy leaders on the JAMA Forum. It covers news briefs on major reports released by government agencies, foundations, health policy think tanks, and other policy-focused organizations. JAMA Health Forum is a member of the JAMA Network, which is a consortium of peer-reviewed, general medical and specialty publications. The journal presents curated health policy content from across the JAMA Network, including journals such as JAMA and JAMA Internal Medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信