Effects of distant biofield energy healing on adults associated with psychological and mental health-related symptoms: a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study.

IF 2 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Health Psychology Research Pub Date : 2024-08-15 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.52965/001c.122225
Mahendra Kumar Trivedi, Alice Branton, Dahryn Trivedi, Sambhu Mondal, Snehasis Jana
{"title":"Effects of distant biofield energy healing on adults associated with psychological and mental health-related symptoms: a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study.","authors":"Mahendra Kumar Trivedi, Alice Branton, Dahryn Trivedi, Sambhu Mondal, Snehasis Jana","doi":"10.52965/001c.122225","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In recent years, popularity of Biofield energy healing therapy has increased tremendously parallel to conventional therapy. However, due to insufficient scientific studies on biofield therapies, authors planned this clinical trial to examine the safety and effectiveness of biofield therapy in treating symptoms of psychological and mental health and to explore parameters for its effectiveness.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>One hundred fourteen participants (55 male, 59 female) underwent clinical trials. This trial was randomized, placebo-controlled, three parallel-groups, double-blind, and single-center with subjects who have one or more psychological and mental symptoms. Two sessions of distant (virtual) biofield energy attunement were given on days 0 and 90 for about 5 minutes to the subjects of biofield intervention group (n=39). Besides, control (n=35) and sham control (n=40) group subjects also received kind of treatment in a similar manner to nullify baseline responses. Subjects were assessed by psychological questionnaire scoring using standard scale of assessment and safety parameters.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Perceived psychological symptoms/scores (fatigue/tiredness, sleep disturbances, stress, cognitive impairment, loss of memory, mental restlessness, emotional trauma, anxiety, depression, confusion, financial crises and dissatisfaction, low libido, motivation, confidence, lack of perception, relationship, and social behaviors, etc.) were significantly (p <.0001) improved in biofield intervention group compared to the naïve control and sham control groups. Besides, biofield intervention did not show any study-related adverse effects in all three groups throughout the trial.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The distant (virtual) biofield energy healing therapy significantly improved psychological and mental health-related symptoms without affecting safety concerns, and improved overall health and quality of life.</p>","PeriodicalId":51865,"journal":{"name":"Health Psychology Research","volume":"12 ","pages":"122225"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11392496/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Psychology Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52965/001c.122225","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In recent years, popularity of Biofield energy healing therapy has increased tremendously parallel to conventional therapy. However, due to insufficient scientific studies on biofield therapies, authors planned this clinical trial to examine the safety and effectiveness of biofield therapy in treating symptoms of psychological and mental health and to explore parameters for its effectiveness.

Methods: One hundred fourteen participants (55 male, 59 female) underwent clinical trials. This trial was randomized, placebo-controlled, three parallel-groups, double-blind, and single-center with subjects who have one or more psychological and mental symptoms. Two sessions of distant (virtual) biofield energy attunement were given on days 0 and 90 for about 5 minutes to the subjects of biofield intervention group (n=39). Besides, control (n=35) and sham control (n=40) group subjects also received kind of treatment in a similar manner to nullify baseline responses. Subjects were assessed by psychological questionnaire scoring using standard scale of assessment and safety parameters.

Results: Perceived psychological symptoms/scores (fatigue/tiredness, sleep disturbances, stress, cognitive impairment, loss of memory, mental restlessness, emotional trauma, anxiety, depression, confusion, financial crises and dissatisfaction, low libido, motivation, confidence, lack of perception, relationship, and social behaviors, etc.) were significantly (p <.0001) improved in biofield intervention group compared to the naïve control and sham control groups. Besides, biofield intervention did not show any study-related adverse effects in all three groups throughout the trial.

Conclusions: The distant (virtual) biofield energy healing therapy significantly improved psychological and mental health-related symptoms without affecting safety concerns, and improved overall health and quality of life.

远距离生物场能量疗法对成人心理和精神健康相关症状的影响:随机、安慰剂对照、双盲研究。
背景:近年来,与传统疗法相比,生物场能量疗法的普及率大幅提高。然而,由于对生物场疗法的科学研究不足,作者计划进行这项临床试验,以检查生物场疗法在治疗心理和精神健康症状方面的安全性和有效性,并探索其有效性的参数:114名参与者(55名男性,59名女性)接受了临床试验。该试验为随机、安慰剂对照、三组平行、双盲、单中心试验,受试者均有一种或多种心理和精神症状。生物场干预组受试者(39 人)分别在第 0 天和第 90 天接受了两次约 5 分钟的远距离(虚拟)生物场能量调适。此外,对照组(35 人)和假对照组(40 人)也接受了类似的治疗,以消除基线反应。受试者通过心理问卷进行评估,采用标准评估量表和安全参数进行评分:结果:受试者的心理症状/得分(疲劳/疲倦、睡眠障碍、压力、认知障碍、记忆力减退、精神烦躁、情感创伤、焦虑、抑郁、困惑、财务危机和不满、性欲低下、动机、自信、缺乏感知、人际关系和社交行为等)均显著降低(p 结论:受试者的心理症状/得分均显著降低(p 结论:受试者的心理症状/得分均显著降低(p 结论:受试者的心理症状/得分均显著降低(p 结论:受试者的心理症状/得分均显著降低(p 结论):远距离(虚拟)生物场能量疗法明显改善了心理和精神健康相关症状,且不影响安全问题,并改善了整体健康和生活质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health Psychology Research
Health Psychology Research PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
63
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信