Caring for the Unvaccinated During a Pandemic: Connecting Swanson's Theory of Caring.

IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q4 NURSING
Marni B Kellogg, Anna E Schierberl Scherr, Mary Rose McDonough, Brian Ayotte, Rayna Letourneau
{"title":"Caring for the Unvaccinated During a Pandemic: Connecting Swanson's Theory of Caring.","authors":"Marni B Kellogg, Anna E Schierberl Scherr, Mary Rose McDonough, Brian Ayotte, Rayna Letourneau","doi":"10.1891/RTNP-2023-0151","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background and Purpose:</b> Nurses frequently care for patients who make decisions against medical advice, a challenge that continues during and after the COVID-19 pandemic. This article explores U.S. nurses' experiences caring for unvaccinated COVID-19 patients and the resulting impacts using Swanson's Theory of Caring (STC). <b>Methods:</b> Data were gathered through an online survey collecting nurses' demographics, mental health screening data, and an open-ended question asking about a personal experience providing care to an unvaccinated COVID-19 patient. Researchers analyzed 128 responses using content analysis. STC served as the analytical framework. <b>Results:</b> Nurses' experiences were summarized into two main themes and four subthemes: (a) anger, frustration, fatigue, and resentment (24.2%) and (b) feeling a professional commitment to a nurse's duty (60.9%). Within the professional commitment theme, subthemes include the following: (a) patients can make an autonomous decision (15.6%); (b) feeling concerned for the patient (6.3%); (c) wanting to take action, educate, and vaccinate (29.7%); and (d) feeling moral conflict (9.3%). Results aligned with STC's five caring actions: knowing, doing for, being with, enabling, and maintaining belief. <b>Implications for Practice:</b> Nurses experienced emotional challenges caring for the unvaccinated during the pandemic resulting in psychological sequelae, including compassion fatigue and moral distress, in addition to positive outcomes of resilience and enhanced coping mechanisms. This study underscores the multifaceted nature of nurses' experiences and the emotional, ethical, and professional challenges they encountered when caring for unvaccinated COVID-19 patients. Nurse leaders should address these issues to enhance nurses' wellbeing and reduce compassion fatigue and dissatisfaction.</p>","PeriodicalId":51287,"journal":{"name":"Research and Theory for Nursing Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research and Theory for Nursing Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1891/RTNP-2023-0151","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and Purpose: Nurses frequently care for patients who make decisions against medical advice, a challenge that continues during and after the COVID-19 pandemic. This article explores U.S. nurses' experiences caring for unvaccinated COVID-19 patients and the resulting impacts using Swanson's Theory of Caring (STC). Methods: Data were gathered through an online survey collecting nurses' demographics, mental health screening data, and an open-ended question asking about a personal experience providing care to an unvaccinated COVID-19 patient. Researchers analyzed 128 responses using content analysis. STC served as the analytical framework. Results: Nurses' experiences were summarized into two main themes and four subthemes: (a) anger, frustration, fatigue, and resentment (24.2%) and (b) feeling a professional commitment to a nurse's duty (60.9%). Within the professional commitment theme, subthemes include the following: (a) patients can make an autonomous decision (15.6%); (b) feeling concerned for the patient (6.3%); (c) wanting to take action, educate, and vaccinate (29.7%); and (d) feeling moral conflict (9.3%). Results aligned with STC's five caring actions: knowing, doing for, being with, enabling, and maintaining belief. Implications for Practice: Nurses experienced emotional challenges caring for the unvaccinated during the pandemic resulting in psychological sequelae, including compassion fatigue and moral distress, in addition to positive outcomes of resilience and enhanced coping mechanisms. This study underscores the multifaceted nature of nurses' experiences and the emotional, ethical, and professional challenges they encountered when caring for unvaccinated COVID-19 patients. Nurse leaders should address these issues to enhance nurses' wellbeing and reduce compassion fatigue and dissatisfaction.

大流行病期间照顾未接种疫苗者:连接斯旺森的关爱理论。
背景和目的:护士经常要照顾那些违背医嘱的病人,这在 COVID-19 大流行期间和之后仍是一项挑战。本文采用斯旺森关怀理论(STC)探讨了美国护士护理未接种 COVID-19 疫苗的患者的经历以及由此产生的影响。方法:通过在线调查收集护士的人口统计数据、心理健康筛查数据,以及一个开放式问题,询问护士护理未接种 COVID-19 患者的个人经历。研究人员采用内容分析法对 128 条回复进行了分析。STC 是分析框架。结果:护士的经历被归纳为两个主要主题和四个次主题:(a)愤怒、沮丧、疲劳和怨恨(24.2%)和(b)对护士职责的职业承诺感(60.9%)。在 "专业承诺 "主题中,子主题包括以下内容:(a) 患者可以自主决定(15.6%);(b) 为患者感到担忧(6.3%);(c) 希望采取行动、开展教育和接种疫苗(29.7%);(d) 感到道德冲突(9.3%)。结果与 STC 的五项关怀行动一致:了解、为之行动、与之在一起、帮助和保持信念。对实践的启示:在大流行病期间,护士在照顾未接种疫苗者时经历了情感挑战,导致了心理后遗症,包括同情疲劳和道德困扰,此外还产生了复原力和应对机制增强的积极结果。本研究强调了护士在护理未接种 COVID-19 疫苗的患者时所经历的多面性,以及她们在情感、道德和专业方面所遇到的挑战。护士长应解决这些问题,以提高护士的幸福感,减少同情疲劳和不满情绪。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Research and Theory for Nursing Practice focuses on issues relevant to improving nursing practice, education, and patient care. The articles strive to discuss knowledge development in its broadest sense, reflect research using a variety of methodological approaches, and combine several methods and strategies in a single study. Because of the journal''s international emphasis, article contributors address the implications of their studies for an international audience.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信