Validation of Emergency Nurse Practitioner Competencies: Patient Complexity and Clinical Decision Making.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Lisa Wolf, Altair Delao, Margaret Carman, Claire Simon
{"title":"Validation of Emergency Nurse Practitioner Competencies: Patient Complexity and Clinical Decision Making.","authors":"Lisa Wolf, Altair Delao, Margaret Carman, Claire Simon","doi":"10.1016/j.jen.2024.08.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Over the past 15 years, the emergency nurse practitioner has been recognized as a nursing specialty role with dedicated scope and standards of practice. However, a paucity of objective data exists to validate the actual practice of emergency nurse practitioners in the emergency care setting. The purpose of this pilot study was to describe the initial acuity of patients assigned to emergency nurse practitioners, actions, decisional complexity, and disposition decisions of advanced practice nurses as they function in emergency departments in a single system.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This descriptive exploratory study used retrospective chart data to gain understanding.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The most common Emergency Severity Index level seen by emergency nurse practitioners was Emergency Severity Index 3. Of 8513 encounters with Emergency Severity Index level data, 21% were triaged at Emergency Severity Index 2, 56% at Emergency Severity Index 3, 21% at Emergency Severity Index 4, and only 2% at Emergency Severity Index 5. Half of encounters resulted in a Current Procedural Terminology code of 99825 or higher and 94% were coded at 99824 or higher. There were a high percentage of admissions including intensive care unit admissions.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Although descriptive, this study is highly illustrative of the broad scope of complex skills and clinical decision making required to perform as an advanced practice nurse in the emergency department. Further examination of education and training is warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":51082,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Emergency Nursing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Emergency Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jen.2024.08.006","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Over the past 15 years, the emergency nurse practitioner has been recognized as a nursing specialty role with dedicated scope and standards of practice. However, a paucity of objective data exists to validate the actual practice of emergency nurse practitioners in the emergency care setting. The purpose of this pilot study was to describe the initial acuity of patients assigned to emergency nurse practitioners, actions, decisional complexity, and disposition decisions of advanced practice nurses as they function in emergency departments in a single system.

Methods: This descriptive exploratory study used retrospective chart data to gain understanding.

Results: The most common Emergency Severity Index level seen by emergency nurse practitioners was Emergency Severity Index 3. Of 8513 encounters with Emergency Severity Index level data, 21% were triaged at Emergency Severity Index 2, 56% at Emergency Severity Index 3, 21% at Emergency Severity Index 4, and only 2% at Emergency Severity Index 5. Half of encounters resulted in a Current Procedural Terminology code of 99825 or higher and 94% were coded at 99824 or higher. There were a high percentage of admissions including intensive care unit admissions.

Discussion: Although descriptive, this study is highly illustrative of the broad scope of complex skills and clinical decision making required to perform as an advanced practice nurse in the emergency department. Further examination of education and training is warranted.

验证急诊执业护士的能力:病人复杂性与临床决策。
简介:在过去的 15 年中,急诊执业护士已被公认为是一种具有专门执业范围和标准的护理专业角色。然而,目前尚缺乏客观数据来验证急诊护士在急诊环境中的实际操作。本试验性研究的目的是描述分配给急诊执业护士的病人的初始严重程度、行动、决策复杂性以及高级执业护士在单一系统的急诊科工作时的处置决定:这项描述性探索研究使用回顾性病历数据来了解情况:结果:急诊执业护士最常见的急诊严重程度指数级别是急诊严重程度指数3。在有急诊严重程度指数数据的 8513 次就诊中,21% 的就诊者被分诊为急诊严重程度指数 2,56% 的就诊者被分诊为急诊严重程度指数 3,21% 的就诊者被分诊为急诊严重程度指数 4,只有 2% 的就诊者被分诊为急诊严重程度指数 5。半数就诊者的当前程序术语代码为 99825 或更高,94% 的就诊者的当前程序术语代码为 99824 或更高。包括重症监护室在内的入院比例很高:本研究虽然是描述性的,但高度说明了作为急诊科高级实践护士所需的复杂技能和临床决策的广泛范围。有必要对教育和培训进行进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
11.80%
发文量
132
审稿时长
46 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Emergency Nursing, the official journal of the Emergency Nurses Association (ENA), is committed to the dissemination of high quality, peer-reviewed manuscripts relevant to all areas of emergency nursing practice across the lifespan. Journal content includes clinical topics, integrative or systematic literature reviews, research, and practice improvement initiatives that provide emergency nurses globally with implications for translation of new knowledge into practice. The Journal also includes focused sections such as case studies, pharmacology/toxicology, injury prevention, trauma, triage, quality and safety, pediatrics and geriatrics. The Journal aims to mirror the goal of ENA to promote: community, governance and leadership, knowledge, quality and safety, and advocacy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信