Implementation of a dynamic model updating pipeline provides a systematic process for maintaining performance of prediction models

IF 7.3 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Kamaryn T. Tanner , Karla Diaz-Ordaz , Ruth H. Keogh
{"title":"Implementation of a dynamic model updating pipeline provides a systematic process for maintaining performance of prediction models","authors":"Kamaryn T. Tanner ,&nbsp;Karla Diaz-Ordaz ,&nbsp;Ruth H. Keogh","doi":"10.1016/j.jclinepi.2024.111531","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>We describe the steps for implementing a dynamic updating pipeline for clinical prediction models and illustrate the proposed methods in an application of 5-year survival prediction in cystic fibrosis.</div></div><div><h3>Study Design and Setting</h3><div>Dynamic model updating refers to the process of repeated updating of a clinical prediction model with new information to counter performance degradation. We describe 2 types of updating pipeline: “proactive updating” where candidate model updates are tested any time new data are available, and “reactive updating” where updates are only made when performance of the current model declines or the model structure changes. Methods for selecting the best candidate updating model are based on measures of predictive performance under the 2 pipelines. The methods are illustrated in our motivating example of a 5-year survival prediction model in cystic fibrosis. Over a dynamic updating period of 10 years, we report the updating decisions made and the performance of the prediction models selected under each pipeline.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Both the proactive and reactive updating pipelines produced survival prediction models that overall had better performance in terms of calibration and discrimination than a model that was not updated. Further, use of the dynamic updating pipelines ensured that the prediction model’s performance was consistently and frequently reviewed in new data.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Implementing a dynamic updating pipeline will help guard against model performance degradation while ensuring that the updating process is principled and data-driven.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51079,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Epidemiology","volume":"175 ","pages":"Article 111531"},"PeriodicalIF":7.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0895435624002877","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

We describe the steps for implementing a dynamic updating pipeline for clinical prediction models and illustrate the proposed methods in an application of 5-year survival prediction in cystic fibrosis.

Study Design and Setting

Dynamic model updating refers to the process of repeated updating of a clinical prediction model with new information to counter performance degradation. We describe 2 types of updating pipeline: “proactive updating” where candidate model updates are tested any time new data are available, and “reactive updating” where updates are only made when performance of the current model declines or the model structure changes. Methods for selecting the best candidate updating model are based on measures of predictive performance under the 2 pipelines. The methods are illustrated in our motivating example of a 5-year survival prediction model in cystic fibrosis. Over a dynamic updating period of 10 years, we report the updating decisions made and the performance of the prediction models selected under each pipeline.

Results

Both the proactive and reactive updating pipelines produced survival prediction models that overall had better performance in terms of calibration and discrimination than a model that was not updated. Further, use of the dynamic updating pipelines ensured that the prediction model’s performance was consistently and frequently reviewed in new data.

Conclusion

Implementing a dynamic updating pipeline will help guard against model performance degradation while ensuring that the updating process is principled and data-driven.
动态模型更新管道的实施为保持预测模型的性能提供了一个系统化流程。
目的:我们描述了临床预测模型动态更新管道的实施步骤,并在囊性纤维化患者 5 年生存率预测中应用所提出的方法进行说明:我们描述了为临床预测模型实施动态更新管道的步骤,并在囊性纤维化的 5 年生存预测应用中说明了所提出的方法:动态模型更新是指利用新信息反复更新临床预测模型,以应对性能下降的过程。我们描述了两种类型的更新管道:"主动更新 "和 "被动更新"。"主动更新 "是指在获得新数据时测试候选模型更新;而 "被动更新 "是指只有在当前模型性能下降或模型结构发生变化时才进行更新。选择最佳候选更新模型的方法基于两种管道下的预测性能测量。我们以囊性纤维化的 5 年生存预测模型为例说明了这些方法。在 10 年的动态更新期内,我们报告了在每种管道下做出的更新决策和所选预测模型的性能:结果:主动更新管道和被动更新管道所生成的生存预测模型在校准和判别方面的整体性能均优于未更新的模型。此外,使用动态更新管道可确保预测模型的性能在新数据中得到持续和频繁的审查:结论:实施动态更新管道有助于防止模型性能下降,同时确保更新过程遵循原则并以数据为导向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
12.00
自引率
6.90%
发文量
320
审稿时长
44 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Epidemiology strives to enhance the quality of clinical and patient-oriented healthcare research by advancing and applying innovative methods in conducting, presenting, synthesizing, disseminating, and translating research results into optimal clinical practice. Special emphasis is placed on training new generations of scientists and clinical practice leaders.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信