The feasibility and equity of text messaging to determine patient eligibility for lung cancer screening.

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Ilona Fridman, Lisa Carter-Bawa, Christine M Neslund-Dudas, Jennifer Elston Lafata
{"title":"The feasibility and equity of text messaging to determine patient eligibility for lung cancer screening.","authors":"Ilona Fridman, Lisa Carter-Bawa, Christine M Neslund-Dudas, Jennifer Elston Lafata","doi":"10.37765/ajmc.2024.89602","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Text messaging could be effective for determining patient eligibility for lung cancer screening (LCS). We explored people's willingness to share their tobacco use history via text message among diverse groups.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Cross-sectional survey.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In 2020, we conducted a cross-sectional survey asking respondents about cellular phone usage, smoking habits, sociodemographic characteristics, and the likelihood of responding to a text message from their health care provider's office about tobacco use. We used χ² and analysis of variance tests for comparisons.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 745 respondents, 90% used text messaging casually. Overall, 54% never smoked, 33% currently smoked, and 13% previously smoked. Six percent were LCS eligible, and 20% used both cigarettes and e-cigarettes (dual users). Current smokers were significantly younger, less likely to be female, and more likely to use text messaging. LCS-eligible respondents were older and less likely to have a high income. Dual users were younger, less likely to report female gender and live in rural areas, and more likely to have a college education and high income. Most respondents (83%) indicated they were likely to respond to text message inquiries regarding smoking status. Middle-aged respondents (mean age, 37 years) were significantly more willing to report smoking status than younger or older respondents (91% vs 84% and 84%, respectively). Respondents with no college education (83% vs 88%) or with a low income vs a middle or high income (81% vs 86% and 88%, respectively) were significantly less willing to report smoking status via text messages.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Text messaging showed promise for evaluating smoking history and for simplifying the process of identifying LCS-eligible individuals. However, achieving equity in identifying eligibility for LCS requires the implementation of multimodal strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":50808,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Managed Care","volume":"30 9","pages":"440-444"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Managed Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37765/ajmc.2024.89602","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Text messaging could be effective for determining patient eligibility for lung cancer screening (LCS). We explored people's willingness to share their tobacco use history via text message among diverse groups.

Study design: Cross-sectional survey.

Methods: In 2020, we conducted a cross-sectional survey asking respondents about cellular phone usage, smoking habits, sociodemographic characteristics, and the likelihood of responding to a text message from their health care provider's office about tobacco use. We used χ² and analysis of variance tests for comparisons.

Results: Among 745 respondents, 90% used text messaging casually. Overall, 54% never smoked, 33% currently smoked, and 13% previously smoked. Six percent were LCS eligible, and 20% used both cigarettes and e-cigarettes (dual users). Current smokers were significantly younger, less likely to be female, and more likely to use text messaging. LCS-eligible respondents were older and less likely to have a high income. Dual users were younger, less likely to report female gender and live in rural areas, and more likely to have a college education and high income. Most respondents (83%) indicated they were likely to respond to text message inquiries regarding smoking status. Middle-aged respondents (mean age, 37 years) were significantly more willing to report smoking status than younger or older respondents (91% vs 84% and 84%, respectively). Respondents with no college education (83% vs 88%) or with a low income vs a middle or high income (81% vs 86% and 88%, respectively) were significantly less willing to report smoking status via text messages.

Conclusions: Text messaging showed promise for evaluating smoking history and for simplifying the process of identifying LCS-eligible individuals. However, achieving equity in identifying eligibility for LCS requires the implementation of multimodal strategies.

用短信确定患者是否符合肺癌筛查条件的可行性和公平性。
目的:短信可有效确定患者是否符合肺癌筛查(LCS)的条件。我们探讨了不同群体中人们通过短信分享烟草使用史的意愿:研究设计:横断面调查:2020 年,我们进行了一项横断面调查,询问受访者的手机使用情况、吸烟习惯、社会人口学特征以及回复医疗服务提供者办公室发送的烟草使用短信的可能性。我们使用χ²和方差分析进行了比较:在745名受访者中,90%的人随意使用短信。总体而言,54%的受访者从不吸烟,33%的受访者目前吸烟,13%的受访者以前吸烟。6%的受访者符合长期吸烟条件,20%的受访者同时使用香烟和电子烟(双重使用者)。目前吸烟的受访者明显更年轻,女性比例更低,使用短信的比例更高。符合 LCS 资格的受访者年龄较大,不太可能有高收入。双重使用者更年轻,报告性别为女性和居住在农村地区的可能性较小,而受过大学教育和收入较高的可能性较大。大多数受访者(83%)表示他们可能会回复有关吸烟状况的短信询问。中年受访者(平均年龄 37 岁)报告吸烟状况的意愿明显高于年轻或年长的受访者(分别为 91% 对 84% 和 84%)。未受过大学教育(83% 对 88%)或低收入对中高收入(81% 对 86% 和 88%)的受访者通过短信报告吸烟状况的意愿明显较低:结论:短信在评估吸烟史和简化识别符合长期护理服务资格的个人的过程方面显示出前景。然而,要实现公平地确定是否符合 LCS 的条件,需要实施多模式策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American Journal of Managed Care
American Journal of Managed Care 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
177
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Managed Care is an independent, peer-reviewed publication dedicated to disseminating clinical information to managed care physicians, clinical decision makers, and other healthcare professionals. Its aim is to stimulate scientific communication in the ever-evolving field of managed care. The American Journal of Managed Care addresses a broad range of issues relevant to clinical decision making in a cost-constrained environment and examines the impact of clinical, management, and policy interventions and programs on healthcare and economic outcomes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信