Xiaojuan Wan , Dorothy Ngo Sheung Chan , Janita Pak Chun Chau , Yu Zhang , Yuexia Liao , Pinting Zhu , Kai Chow Choi
{"title":"Effects of a nurse-led peer support intervention on psychosocial outcomes of stroke survivors: A randomised controlled trial","authors":"Xiaojuan Wan , Dorothy Ngo Sheung Chan , Janita Pak Chun Chau , Yu Zhang , Yuexia Liao , Pinting Zhu , Kai Chow Choi","doi":"10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2024.104892","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Living with stroke poses many psychosocial challenges. Interventions for improving stroke survivors' psychosocial outcomes are lacking. Peer support interventions may contribute to recovery after stroke. However, current evidence is insufficient to suggest their application in enhancing stroke survivors' psychosocial well-being.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of a nurse-led peer support intervention for improving the psychosocial outcomes of stroke survivors.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>An assessor-blinded two-arm randomised controlled trial with an attention control group.</div></div><div><h3>Settings</h3><div>A community health centre and a rehabilitation unit in Yangzhou, China.</div></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><div>First-ever or recurrent ischaemic or haemorrhagic stroke survivors.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A convenience sample of 120 stroke survivors was recruited with 60 participants randomly assigned to each of the intervention and control groups. Intervention group participants received the nurse-led peer support intervention. Control group participants received attention care. The primary outcomes were social participation and participation self-efficacy. The secondary outcomes were psychological distress, perceived social support, stigma towards diseases, and quality of life. Data were collected at baseline (T0), immediately post-intervention (T1) and three months post-intervention (T2). Generalised estimating equations models were used to determine the effects of the intervention on the outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The intervention significantly improved social participation (T1: adjusted mean difference = −<!--> <!-->18.45, 95 % CI: −<!--> <!-->22.89 to −<!--> <!-->14.01, <em>p</em> < 0.001; T2: adjusted mean difference = −<!--> <!-->14.71, 95 % CI: −<!--> <!-->22.36 to −<!--> <!-->7.05, <em>p</em> < 0.001), participation self-efficacy (T1: adjusted mean difference = 47.92, 95 % CI: 37.56 to 58.27, <em>p</em> < 0.001; T2: adjusted mean difference = 39.58, 95 % CI: 17.88 to 61.28, <em>p</em> < 0.001) and perceived social support (T1: adjusted mean difference = 7.56, 95 % CI: 4.93 to 10.19, <em>p</em> < 0.001; T2: adjusted mean difference = 7.41, 95 % CI: 4.01 to 10.80, <em>p</em> < 0.001), and reduced psychological distress (T1: adjusted mean difference = −<!--> <!-->4.97, 95 % CI: −<!--> <!-->6.25 to −<!--> <!-->3.69, <em>p</em> < 0.001; T2: adjusted mean difference = −<!--> <!-->4.67, 95 % CI: −<!--> <!-->6.24 to −<!--> <!-->3.11, <em>p</em> < 0.001) and stigma towards diseases (T1: adjusted mean difference = −<!--> <!-->3.83, 95 % CI: −<!--> <!-->5.14 to −<!--> <!-->2.51, <em>p</em> < 0.001; T2: adjusted mean difference = −<!--> <!-->3.19, 95 % CI: −<!--> <!-->5.20 to −<!--> <!-->1.19, <em>p</em> < 0.001) at both T1 and T2. The intervention significantly improved quality of life at T1 only (adjusted mean difference = 0.12, 95 % CI: 0.06 to 0.19, <em>p</em> = 0.02).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The results provide empirical support for the effectiveness of the nurse-led peer support intervention in improving the psychosocial outcomes of stroke survivors and provide additional evidence to support their inclusion in stroke rehabilitation.</div></div><div><h3>Registration</h3><div><span><span>ChiCTR.org.cn</span><svg><path></path></svg></span> (ChiCTR2100050853), Start of recruitment: October 2021.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50299,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Nursing Studies","volume":"160 ","pages":"Article 104892"},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Nursing Studies","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0020748924002050","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Living with stroke poses many psychosocial challenges. Interventions for improving stroke survivors' psychosocial outcomes are lacking. Peer support interventions may contribute to recovery after stroke. However, current evidence is insufficient to suggest their application in enhancing stroke survivors' psychosocial well-being.
Objective
This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of a nurse-led peer support intervention for improving the psychosocial outcomes of stroke survivors.
Design
An assessor-blinded two-arm randomised controlled trial with an attention control group.
Settings
A community health centre and a rehabilitation unit in Yangzhou, China.
Participants
First-ever or recurrent ischaemic or haemorrhagic stroke survivors.
Methods
A convenience sample of 120 stroke survivors was recruited with 60 participants randomly assigned to each of the intervention and control groups. Intervention group participants received the nurse-led peer support intervention. Control group participants received attention care. The primary outcomes were social participation and participation self-efficacy. The secondary outcomes were psychological distress, perceived social support, stigma towards diseases, and quality of life. Data were collected at baseline (T0), immediately post-intervention (T1) and three months post-intervention (T2). Generalised estimating equations models were used to determine the effects of the intervention on the outcomes.
Results
The intervention significantly improved social participation (T1: adjusted mean difference = − 18.45, 95 % CI: − 22.89 to − 14.01, p < 0.001; T2: adjusted mean difference = − 14.71, 95 % CI: − 22.36 to − 7.05, p < 0.001), participation self-efficacy (T1: adjusted mean difference = 47.92, 95 % CI: 37.56 to 58.27, p < 0.001; T2: adjusted mean difference = 39.58, 95 % CI: 17.88 to 61.28, p < 0.001) and perceived social support (T1: adjusted mean difference = 7.56, 95 % CI: 4.93 to 10.19, p < 0.001; T2: adjusted mean difference = 7.41, 95 % CI: 4.01 to 10.80, p < 0.001), and reduced psychological distress (T1: adjusted mean difference = − 4.97, 95 % CI: − 6.25 to − 3.69, p < 0.001; T2: adjusted mean difference = − 4.67, 95 % CI: − 6.24 to − 3.11, p < 0.001) and stigma towards diseases (T1: adjusted mean difference = − 3.83, 95 % CI: − 5.14 to − 2.51, p < 0.001; T2: adjusted mean difference = − 3.19, 95 % CI: − 5.20 to − 1.19, p < 0.001) at both T1 and T2. The intervention significantly improved quality of life at T1 only (adjusted mean difference = 0.12, 95 % CI: 0.06 to 0.19, p = 0.02).
Conclusions
The results provide empirical support for the effectiveness of the nurse-led peer support intervention in improving the psychosocial outcomes of stroke survivors and provide additional evidence to support their inclusion in stroke rehabilitation.
Registration
ChiCTR.org.cn (ChiCTR2100050853), Start of recruitment: October 2021.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Nursing Studies (IJNS) is a highly respected journal that has been publishing original peer-reviewed articles since 1963. It provides a forum for original research and scholarship about health care delivery, organisation, management, workforce, policy, and research methods relevant to nursing, midwifery, and other health related professions. The journal aims to support evidence informed policy and practice by publishing research, systematic and other scholarly reviews, critical discussion, and commentary of the highest standard. The IJNS is indexed in major databases including PubMed, Medline, Thomson Reuters - Science Citation Index, Scopus, Thomson Reuters - Social Science Citation Index, CINAHL, and the BNI (British Nursing Index).