The physical activity in cancer survivors (PACES) trial: a factorial randomized trial to optimize intervention for breast cancer survivors.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Journal of Behavioral Medicine Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-21 DOI:10.1007/s10865-024-00518-x
Chad D Rethorst, Thomas J Carmody, Keith E Argenbright, Louis Vazquez, Thomas DeLuca, Taryn L Mayes, Heidi A Hamann, Madhukar H Trivedi
{"title":"The physical activity in cancer survivors (PACES) trial: a factorial randomized trial to optimize intervention for breast cancer survivors.","authors":"Chad D Rethorst, Thomas J Carmody, Keith E Argenbright, Louis Vazquez, Thomas DeLuca, Taryn L Mayes, Heidi A Hamann, Madhukar H Trivedi","doi":"10.1007/s10865-024-00518-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Multiple intervention strategies have been found effective for increasing physical activity among breast cancer survivors, yet most breast cancer survivors fail to meet physical activity recommendations. Optimization of interventions can facilitate real word implementation to ensure effective and efficient intervention delivery. Using a full-factorial design based on the Multiphase Optimization Strategy, 337 breast cancer survivors were randomized to receive a combination of four intervention components: (1) supervised exercise sessions, (2) facility membership, (3) Active Living Every Day (ALED), and (4) Fitbit. Moderate-to vigorous (MVPA) and light-intensity physical activity (LPA) were measured at baseline, 3 months, and 6 months with a hip-worn Actigraph GT3X+. Normal linear mixed models with separate intercepts for each subject were fit in the SAS 9.4 Mixed procedure. Participants who received supervised exercise sessions engaged in more MVPA, 153.58 min/week vs. 133.0 min/week (F = 3.97, p = 0.048) and LPA, 170.26 min/day versus 160.98 light PA minutes/day (F = 4.67, p = 0.032), compared to participants who did not receive supervised exercise. The effects of the three other intervention components on MVPA were not significant; however, those that received ALED engaged in less LPA (F = 6.6, p = 0.011). Supervised exercise sessions resulted in significant increases in MVPA and LPA in a sample of breast cancer survivors. Of note, these sessions were provided only during the first 6 weeks of the intervention and effects remained significant at 6 months. Results of this trial could inform future implementation efforts to ensure effective and efficient delivery of physical activity programs for breast cancer survivors.</p>","PeriodicalId":48329,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Behavioral Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1002-1011"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Behavioral Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10865-024-00518-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Multiple intervention strategies have been found effective for increasing physical activity among breast cancer survivors, yet most breast cancer survivors fail to meet physical activity recommendations. Optimization of interventions can facilitate real word implementation to ensure effective and efficient intervention delivery. Using a full-factorial design based on the Multiphase Optimization Strategy, 337 breast cancer survivors were randomized to receive a combination of four intervention components: (1) supervised exercise sessions, (2) facility membership, (3) Active Living Every Day (ALED), and (4) Fitbit. Moderate-to vigorous (MVPA) and light-intensity physical activity (LPA) were measured at baseline, 3 months, and 6 months with a hip-worn Actigraph GT3X+. Normal linear mixed models with separate intercepts for each subject were fit in the SAS 9.4 Mixed procedure. Participants who received supervised exercise sessions engaged in more MVPA, 153.58 min/week vs. 133.0 min/week (F = 3.97, p = 0.048) and LPA, 170.26 min/day versus 160.98 light PA minutes/day (F = 4.67, p = 0.032), compared to participants who did not receive supervised exercise. The effects of the three other intervention components on MVPA were not significant; however, those that received ALED engaged in less LPA (F = 6.6, p = 0.011). Supervised exercise sessions resulted in significant increases in MVPA and LPA in a sample of breast cancer survivors. Of note, these sessions were provided only during the first 6 weeks of the intervention and effects remained significant at 6 months. Results of this trial could inform future implementation efforts to ensure effective and efficient delivery of physical activity programs for breast cancer survivors.

癌症幸存者体育锻炼(PACES)试验:优化乳腺癌幸存者干预措施的因子随机试验。
研究发现,多种干预策略对增加乳腺癌幸存者的体育锻炼有效,但大多数乳腺癌幸存者未能达到体育锻炼建议的要求。对干预措施进行优化可以促进真正的实施,以确保有效和高效地提供干预措施。利用基于多阶段优化策略的全因子设计,337 名乳腺癌幸存者被随机分配接受四种干预成分的组合:(1) 指导性锻炼课程,(2) 设施会员资格,(3) 积极生活每一天 (ALED) 和 (4) Fitbit。在基线、3 个月和 6 个月时,使用臀部佩戴的 Actigraph GT3X+ 对中强度(MVPA)和轻强度体力活动(LPA)进行测量。采用 SAS 9.4 混合程序拟合了每个受试者具有单独截距的正态线性混合模型。与未接受指导锻炼的参与者相比,接受指导锻炼的参与者参与了更多的中量运动(153.58 分钟/周对 133.0 分钟/周,F = 3.97,P = 0.048)和轻量运动(170.26 分钟/天对 160.98 分钟/天,F = 4.67,P = 0.032)。其他三项干预措施对 MVPA 的影响并不显著;但是,接受 ALED 的参与者参与的 LPA 更少(F = 6.6,p = 0.011)。在乳腺癌幸存者样本中,有监督的运动课程使 MVPA 和 LPA 显著增加。值得注意的是,这些课程仅在干预的前 6 周提供,6 个月后效果仍然显著。这项试验的结果可为今后的实施工作提供参考,以确保有效、高效地为乳腺癌幸存者提供体育锻炼计划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Behavioral Medicine
Journal of Behavioral Medicine PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
3.20%
发文量
112
期刊介绍: The Journal of Behavioral Medicine is a broadly conceived interdisciplinary publication devoted to furthering understanding of physical health and illness through the knowledge, methods, and techniques of behavioral science. A significant function of the journal is the application of this knowledge to prevention, treatment, and rehabilitation and to the promotion of health at the individual, community, and population levels.The content of the journal spans all areas of basic and applied behavioral medicine research, conducted in and informed by all related disciplines including but not limited to: psychology, medicine, the public health sciences, sociology, anthropology, health economics, nursing, and biostatistics. Topics welcomed include but are not limited to: prevention of disease and health promotion; the effects of psychological stress on physical and psychological functioning; sociocultural influences on health and illness; adherence to medical regimens; the study of health related behaviors including tobacco use, substance use, sexual behavior, physical activity, and obesity; health services research; and behavioral factors in the prevention and treatment of somatic disorders.  Reports of interdisciplinary approaches to research are particularly welcomed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信