Adenoid Cystic Carcinoma with Sebaceous Differentiation and MYB::NFIB Fusion Arising in the External Auditory Canal.

IF 3.2 Q2 PATHOLOGY

Head & Neck Pathology Pub Date : 2024-09-23 DOI:10.1007/s12105-024-01689-4

Grayson Cole, Terence Imbery, Elizabeth A Blair, Matthew L Kleinjan, Peng Wang, Nicole A Cipriani

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Adenoid cystic carcinoma arising in the external auditory canal is rare, and even rarer are cases with sebaceous differentiation mimicking sebaceous carcinoma. This case with clinical, radiologic, gross, and histologic images exemplifies an unusual occurrence of adenoid cystic carcinoma in the external auditory canal with sebaceous differentiation, confirmed by MYB::NFIB fusion.

查看原文本刊更多论文

外耳道中出现的具有皮脂腺分化和 MYB::NFIB 融合的腺样囊性癌

外耳道腺样囊性癌非常罕见，而模仿皮脂腺癌进行皮脂腺分化的病例则更为罕见。本病例的临床、放射学、大体和组织学图像显示，外耳道腺样囊性癌伴皮脂腺分化，并经 MYB::NFIB 融合证实。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Head & Neck Pathology PATHOLOGY-

CiteScore

5.70

自引率

9.50%

发文量

期刊介绍： Head & Neck Pathology presents scholarly papers, reviews and symposia that cover the spectrum of human surgical pathology within the anatomic zones of the oral cavity, sinonasal tract, larynx, hypopharynx, salivary gland, ear and temporal bone, and neck. The journal publishes rapid developments in new diagnostic criteria, intraoperative consultation, immunohistochemical studies, molecular techniques, genetic analyses, diagnostic aids, experimental pathology, cytology, radiographic imaging, and application of uniform terminology to allow practitioners to continue to maintain and expand their knowledge in the subspecialty of head and neck pathology. Coverage of practical application to daily clinical practice is supported with proceedings and symposia from international societies and academies devoted to this field. Single-blind peer review The journal follows a single-blind review procedure, where the reviewers are aware of the names and affiliations of the authors, but the reviewer reports provided to authors are anonymous. Single-blind peer review is the traditional model of peer review that many reviewers are comfortable with, and it facilitates a dispassionate critique of a manuscript.