Global bibliometric analysis of cost effectiveness analysis in healthcare research from 2013 to 2023.

IF 1.7 4区医学 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES

Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation Pub Date : 2024-09-16 DOI:10.1186/s12962-024-00576-7

Kemdi Lugard Okoroiwu, Henshaw Uchechi Okoroiwu, Love Ogochukwu Ude, Chidimma Odilia Ezuma, Emmanuel Ikechukwu Omeje

{"title":"Global bibliometric analysis of cost effectiveness analysis in healthcare research from 2013 to 2023.","authors":"Kemdi Lugard Okoroiwu, Henshaw Uchechi Okoroiwu, Love Ogochukwu Ude, Chidimma Odilia Ezuma, Emmanuel Ikechukwu Omeje","doi":"10.1186/s12962-024-00576-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) has become a crucial technique in appraising the efficiency of healthcare interventions and resource allocation decisions. Cost-effectiveness analysis is now widely used to evaluate whether the effect of a healthcare intervention justifies additional expenditure.Method: We used PubMed database with search descriptors: \"Cost effectiveness\" [Title / Abstract] OR \"Cost effectiveness analysis\" [Title / Abstract] AND \"Healthcare\" [Title / Abstract]. The common bibliometric indicators were applied.Results: We retrieved a total of 7,561 articles within 2013 and 2023. The growth pattern showed a progressive pattern. Articles with 5 authors signature had the highest number in publication. The most productive authors in cost effectiveness research in healthcare were Liew Danny and Ademi Zanfina. The most utilized journals for the publications were BMJ Open, PLoS One and Journal of Medical Economics. The most productive institutions were resident in United Kingdom with the University of York and University of Oxford at the helm.Conclusion: Scientific production in Cost effectiveness in healthcare research was found to be progressive. This study provides a reference for health policy makers, funders, policy decision makers, academics, and hospital economics researchers.","PeriodicalId":47054,"journal":{"name":"Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation","volume":"22 1","pages":"68"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11403999/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12962-024-00576-7","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) has become a crucial technique in appraising the efficiency of healthcare interventions and resource allocation decisions. Cost-effectiveness analysis is now widely used to evaluate whether the effect of a healthcare intervention justifies additional expenditure.

Method: We used PubMed database with search descriptors: "Cost effectiveness" [Title / Abstract] OR "Cost effectiveness analysis" [Title / Abstract] AND "Healthcare" [Title / Abstract]. The common bibliometric indicators were applied.

Results: We retrieved a total of 7,561 articles within 2013 and 2023. The growth pattern showed a progressive pattern. Articles with 5 authors signature had the highest number in publication. The most productive authors in cost effectiveness research in healthcare were Liew Danny and Ademi Zanfina. The most utilized journals for the publications were BMJ Open, PLoS One and Journal of Medical Economics. The most productive institutions were resident in United Kingdom with the University of York and University of Oxford at the helm.

Conclusion: Scientific production in Cost effectiveness in healthcare research was found to be progressive. This study provides a reference for health policy makers, funders, policy decision makers, academics, and hospital economics researchers.

查看原文本刊更多论文

2013 至 2023 年全球医疗保健研究成本效益分析文献计量分析。

背景：成本效益分析（CEA）已成为评估医疗干预措施和资源分配决策效率的一项重要技术。目前，成本效益分析已被广泛用于评估医疗干预措施的效果是否能证明额外支出是合理的：我们使用 PubMed 数据库，搜索描述符为"成本效益"[标题/摘要] 或 "成本效益分析"[标题/摘要] 和 "医疗保健"[标题/摘要]。结果：在 2013 年至 2023 年期间，我们共检索到 7561 篇文章。文章的增长模式呈现渐进式。有 5 位作者署名的文章发表数量最多。在医疗保健成本效益研究方面最有成果的作者是廖丹尼和阿德米-赞菲娜。发表文章最多的期刊是《BMJ Open》、《PLoS One》和《Journal of Medical Economics》。发表论文最多的机构是英国的约克大学和牛津大学：结论：研究发现，医疗保健研究中的成本效益方面的科研成果在不断进步。本研究为卫生政策制定者、资助者、政策决策者、学者和医院经济学研究人员提供了参考。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES-

CiteScore

3.40

自引率

4.30%

发文量

审稿时长

34 weeks

期刊介绍： Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation is an Open Access, peer-reviewed, online journal that considers manuscripts on all aspects of cost-effectiveness analysis, including conceptual or methodological work, economic evaluations, and policy analysis related to resource allocation at a national or international level. Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation is aimed at health economists, health services researchers, and policy-makers with an interest in enhancing the flow and transfer of knowledge relating to efficiency in the health sector. Manuscripts are encouraged from researchers based in low- and middle-income countries, with a view to increasing the international economic evidence base for health.