Meditation modalities for ADHD in minority pediatric populations in the USA: a scoping review.

IF 2.4 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Health Promotion Perspectives Pub Date : 2024-07-29 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.34172/hpp.42837
Shahrzad Bazargan-Hejazi, Christopher Martin, Bellamy Hall, Jeneane Hamideh, Miranda Lam, Antonia Osuna-Garcia, Darlene Parker-Kelly, Derek O Pipolo, Myra Usmani, Stacey A Teruya
{"title":"Meditation modalities for ADHD in minority pediatric populations in the USA: a scoping review.","authors":"Shahrzad Bazargan-Hejazi, Christopher Martin, Bellamy Hall, Jeneane Hamideh, Miranda Lam, Antonia Osuna-Garcia, Darlene Parker-Kelly, Derek O Pipolo, Myra Usmani, Stacey A Teruya","doi":"10.34172/hpp.42837","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Roughly 10% of children aged 3 -17 in the USA are diagnosed with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), and minorities are less likely to initiate common pharmacologic treatment. We conducted a review of the literature to examine meditation as a safe, effective, and low-cost alternative.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched PubMed and other journals using \"meditation,\" \"mindfulness,\" \"minority,\" related keywords, and relevant MeSH terms. Eligible studies involved racial/ethnic minorities in the USA, reported quantitative psychosocial outcomes, and were published in a peer-reviewed, English-language journal.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 119 \"hits,\" 111 were eliminated as duplicates or were not relevant. A full-text review of the remaining eight revealed that none fully met our eligibility criteria. Besides the obvious lack of studies, those reviewed reported incomplete demographic and clinical data. They also employed different and inconsistent research methodologies, interventions and modalities, and statistical analyses. This hindered understanding exactly which populations may benefit from meditation, and for which specific symptoms.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We recommend a socio-ecological model in examining intervention modalities, especially in the context of intrapersonal, interpersonal, organizational, environmental, and policy domains. We also suggest the possible inclusion of research older than 10 years, conducted outside of the USA, on minority and non-minority populations, for supplementary and confirmatory data. We advocate for consistency in study design and data collection, which would help align research conducted in different countries. Searches should also include variations of meditation such as \"mindfulness\" and \"guided imagery,\" and associated symptoms and comorbidities of ADHD, including \"learning disorder\" and \"behavioral problems.\"</p>","PeriodicalId":46588,"journal":{"name":"Health Promotion Perspectives","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11403344/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Promotion Perspectives","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34172/hpp.42837","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Roughly 10% of children aged 3 -17 in the USA are diagnosed with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), and minorities are less likely to initiate common pharmacologic treatment. We conducted a review of the literature to examine meditation as a safe, effective, and low-cost alternative.

Methods: We searched PubMed and other journals using "meditation," "mindfulness," "minority," related keywords, and relevant MeSH terms. Eligible studies involved racial/ethnic minorities in the USA, reported quantitative psychosocial outcomes, and were published in a peer-reviewed, English-language journal.

Results: Out of 119 "hits," 111 were eliminated as duplicates or were not relevant. A full-text review of the remaining eight revealed that none fully met our eligibility criteria. Besides the obvious lack of studies, those reviewed reported incomplete demographic and clinical data. They also employed different and inconsistent research methodologies, interventions and modalities, and statistical analyses. This hindered understanding exactly which populations may benefit from meditation, and for which specific symptoms.

Conclusion: We recommend a socio-ecological model in examining intervention modalities, especially in the context of intrapersonal, interpersonal, organizational, environmental, and policy domains. We also suggest the possible inclusion of research older than 10 years, conducted outside of the USA, on minority and non-minority populations, for supplementary and confirmatory data. We advocate for consistency in study design and data collection, which would help align research conducted in different countries. Searches should also include variations of meditation such as "mindfulness" and "guided imagery," and associated symptoms and comorbidities of ADHD, including "learning disorder" and "behavioral problems."

美国少数民族儿童多动症的冥想方式:范围界定综述。
背景:在美国,3-17 岁的儿童中约有 10% 被诊断出患有注意力缺陷多动障碍 (ADHD),而少数群体接受普通药物治疗的可能性较低。我们对文献进行了综述,研究冥想这种安全、有效、低成本的替代方法:我们使用 "冥想"、"正念"、"少数群体"、相关关键词和相关 MeSH 术语搜索了 PubMed 和其他期刊。符合条件的研究涉及美国的少数种族/民族,报告了定量的社会心理结果,并发表在同行评审的英文期刊上:在 119 项 "命中 "研究中,111 项因重复或不相关而被剔除。对其余 8 项研究的全文审查显示,没有一项完全符合我们的资格标准。除了明显缺乏研究外,所查阅的研究报告中的人口统计学和临床数据也不完整。它们还采用了不同且不一致的研究方法、干预措施和模式以及统计分析。这妨碍了人们准确了解哪些人群可能从冥想中受益,以及冥想对哪些特定症状有帮助:我们建议在研究干预方式时采用社会生态模式,特别是在个人、人际、组织、环境和政策领域。我们还建议,在补充和确认数据时,可以纳入 10 年以上的研究、在美国以外进行的研究、针对少数群体和非少数群体的研究。我们主张在研究设计和数据收集方面保持一致,这将有助于统一在不同国家开展的研究。搜索范围还应包括冥想的变体,如 "正念 "和 "引导想象",以及多动症的相关症状和合并症,包括 "学习障碍 "和 "行为问题"。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health Promotion Perspectives
Health Promotion Perspectives PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
2.30%
发文量
27
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信