Comparative Perceptions of Fluoride Toxicity in Oral Hygiene Products: Insights from the General Population and Healthcare Professionals.

IF 1.7 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Marija Badrov, Lidia Gavic, Ana Seselja Perisin, Davor Zeljezic, Jasen Vladislavic, Ema Puizina Mladinic, Antonija Tadin
{"title":"Comparative Perceptions of Fluoride Toxicity in Oral Hygiene Products: Insights from the General Population and Healthcare Professionals.","authors":"Marija Badrov, Lidia Gavic, Ana Seselja Perisin, Davor Zeljezic, Jasen Vladislavic, Ema Puizina Mladinic, Antonija Tadin","doi":"10.3390/clinpract14050146","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The safety of oral hygiene products is a growing concern, particularly regarding the toxicity of specific ingredients used in their formulations. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the knowledge and attitudes of dentists, physicians, pharmacists, and the general public regarding ingredients in oral hygiene products, especially fluoride. Additionally, this study aimed to identify which ingredients may exhibit potential toxicity based on historical records of any adverse effects being induced by a material/component.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A self-administered questionnaire was used in an online cross-sectional observational study to collect data on sociodemographic characteristics, knowledge of fluoride in dental medicine, fluoride usage practices in oral hygiene products, opinions on ingredient toxicity in oral hygiene products, and personal experiences of adverse reactions to products and their components. The collected data underwent descriptive and regression analyses to reveal patterns and relationships within the dataset.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study found a moderate overall knowledge level regarding fluoride usage in dentistry among participants (Md = 5.00, IQR 2.50-7.00). Healthcare professionals exhibited significantly higher knowledge scores compared to the general population (<i>p</i> ≤ 0.001), with dental professionals displaying the highest scores. Regarding concerns about the usage of fluoride, the majority of respondents (77.0%) did not express any concerns. Minor concerns included the risk of ingestion (6.0%) and dental fluorosis (4.6%). Among the other ingredients in oral hygiene products, respondents named alcohol as the most toxic ingredient (70.3%), followed by artificial colors (53.1%), artificial sweeteners (50.4%), and parabens (50.1%). It is noteworthy that the majority of participants (61.6%) stated that they had never experienced any side effects associated with the use of oral hygiene products.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study underscores disparities in fluoride knowledge between healthcare professionals and the general population in Croatia, with dental experts exhibiting a superior understanding. Despite lingering misconceptions about fluoride content and potential toxicity, the majority of participants acknowledge its oral health benefits and use fluoride products regularly.</p>","PeriodicalId":45306,"journal":{"name":"Clinics and Practice","volume":"14 5","pages":"1827-1841"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11417910/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinics and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/clinpract14050146","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The safety of oral hygiene products is a growing concern, particularly regarding the toxicity of specific ingredients used in their formulations. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the knowledge and attitudes of dentists, physicians, pharmacists, and the general public regarding ingredients in oral hygiene products, especially fluoride. Additionally, this study aimed to identify which ingredients may exhibit potential toxicity based on historical records of any adverse effects being induced by a material/component.

Methods: A self-administered questionnaire was used in an online cross-sectional observational study to collect data on sociodemographic characteristics, knowledge of fluoride in dental medicine, fluoride usage practices in oral hygiene products, opinions on ingredient toxicity in oral hygiene products, and personal experiences of adverse reactions to products and their components. The collected data underwent descriptive and regression analyses to reveal patterns and relationships within the dataset.

Results: The study found a moderate overall knowledge level regarding fluoride usage in dentistry among participants (Md = 5.00, IQR 2.50-7.00). Healthcare professionals exhibited significantly higher knowledge scores compared to the general population (p ≤ 0.001), with dental professionals displaying the highest scores. Regarding concerns about the usage of fluoride, the majority of respondents (77.0%) did not express any concerns. Minor concerns included the risk of ingestion (6.0%) and dental fluorosis (4.6%). Among the other ingredients in oral hygiene products, respondents named alcohol as the most toxic ingredient (70.3%), followed by artificial colors (53.1%), artificial sweeteners (50.4%), and parabens (50.1%). It is noteworthy that the majority of participants (61.6%) stated that they had never experienced any side effects associated with the use of oral hygiene products.

Conclusion: This study underscores disparities in fluoride knowledge between healthcare professionals and the general population in Croatia, with dental experts exhibiting a superior understanding. Despite lingering misconceptions about fluoride content and potential toxicity, the majority of participants acknowledge its oral health benefits and use fluoride products regularly.

对口腔卫生产品中氟化物毒性的比较认识:普通民众和医疗保健专业人员的见解。
背景:口腔卫生产品的安全性日益受到关注,尤其是其配方中使用的特定成分的毒性。本研究的目的是评估牙医、医生、药剂师和公众对口腔卫生产品中的成分(尤其是氟化物)的认识和态度。此外,本研究还旨在根据材料/成分引起不良反应的历史记录,确定哪些成分可能具有潜在毒性:方法:在一项在线横断面观察研究中使用了一份自填式问卷,以收集有关社会人口学特征、牙科医学中氟化物的知识、口腔卫生产品中氟化物的使用方法、对口腔卫生产品中成分毒性的看法以及对产品及其成分产生不良反应的个人经历等方面的数据。对收集到的数据进行了描述性分析和回归分析,以揭示数据集中的模式和关系:研究发现,参与者对氟化物在牙科中的应用的总体知识水平处于中等水平(Md = 5.00,IQR 2.50-7.00)。与普通人群相比,医疗保健专业人员的知识得分明显更高(p ≤ 0.001),其中牙科专业人员的得分最高。关于对使用氟化物的担忧,大多数受访者(77.0%)没有表示任何担忧。轻微的担忧包括摄入风险(6.0%)和氟斑牙(4.6%)。在口腔卫生产品的其他成分中,受访者认为酒精是毒性最大的成分(70.3%),其次 是人工色素(53.1%)、人工甜味剂(50.4%)和对羟基苯甲酸酯(50.1%)。值得注意的是,大多数参与者(61.6%)表示,他们从未经历过与使用口腔卫生产品相关的任何副作用:这项研究强调了克罗地亚医疗保健专业人员和普通民众在氟化物知识方面的差异,牙科专家对氟化物的理解更为深刻。尽管对氟化物含量和潜在毒性的误解仍然存在,但大多数参与者都承认氟化物对口腔健康的益处,并经常使用氟化物产品。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinics and Practice
Clinics and Practice MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
4.30%
发文量
91
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信