Communicate to Care: Implementing Health Literacy in a Pediatric Ears, Nose, and Throat Clinic.

Q2 Medicine
Health literacy research and practice Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-09 DOI:10.3928/24748307-20240819-02
Carol J Howe, Emily Carsey, Jordan Gamboa, Yan Zhang, Brennan Lewis
{"title":"Communicate to Care: Implementing Health Literacy in a Pediatric Ears, Nose, and Throat Clinic.","authors":"Carol J Howe, Emily Carsey, Jordan Gamboa, Yan Zhang, Brennan Lewis","doi":"10.3928/24748307-20240819-02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite positive outcomes in controlled trials, organizations have been slow to adopt health literacy practices. The purpose of the Communicate to CARE (Clear Communication, Achieve Understanding with Teach-Back, Receptive to our patient family needs, Empathetic care delivery) study was to use theories and strategies from implementation science to scale up health literacy practices in a pediatric Ears, Nose, and Throat (ENT) clinic.</p><p><strong>Brief description of activity: </strong>Expanding on previous efforts that simply reflected on barriers, the CARE team identified barriers within the local context pre-implementation to select strategies to directly address barriers during health literacy implementation. The RE-AIM framework was used to evaluate the reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation, and maintenance of health literacy practices.</p><p><strong>Implementation: </strong>Over 18 months, the CARE team delivered multiple implementation strategies, including external facilitator, microlessons, preparing champions, audit and feedback, local consensus discussions, and small test of change. We tailored health literacy practices to clinic team roles to accommodate the clinic workflow.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>ENT team mean ratings on acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility remained >4 indicating a high likelihood of successful implementation. Caregiver <i>always</i> ratings significantly increased from baseline to 12 months for easy-to-understand medication instructions (74%-96%), test results (54%-96%), know what to do if had questions (89%-96%), and encouraged to talk about health problems (76%-90%). Caregiver ratings dropped slightly at 18 months, indicating a need for booster training. While one third of caregivers reported Teach-Back practice across all time periods, the ENT team reported increased practice from baseline (42%), 6 (61%) and 12 months (70%).</p><p><strong>Lessons learned: </strong>Over the first 12 months, the external facilitator delivered implementation strategies with weekly contact, tapering contact over the final 6 months. The local champion became engaged in the CARE study through a quality improvement project with meaningful outcomes for the clinic and an incentivization program for scholarly endeavors. Lunch and learn sessions helped build relationships between the CARE and ENT team to discuss and problem solve issues. The 5-item CAHPS health literacy composite proved to be sensitive to changes during implementation of health literacy practices. Integrating these items into standard follow up surveys with patients and families would help realize the return on investment for health literacy implementation. [<b><i>HLRP: Health Literacy Research and Practice</i>. 2024;8(3):e166-e174.</b>].</p>","PeriodicalId":36651,"journal":{"name":"Health literacy research and practice","volume":"8 3","pages":"e166-e174"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11383560/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health literacy research and practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3928/24748307-20240819-02","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Despite positive outcomes in controlled trials, organizations have been slow to adopt health literacy practices. The purpose of the Communicate to CARE (Clear Communication, Achieve Understanding with Teach-Back, Receptive to our patient family needs, Empathetic care delivery) study was to use theories and strategies from implementation science to scale up health literacy practices in a pediatric Ears, Nose, and Throat (ENT) clinic.

Brief description of activity: Expanding on previous efforts that simply reflected on barriers, the CARE team identified barriers within the local context pre-implementation to select strategies to directly address barriers during health literacy implementation. The RE-AIM framework was used to evaluate the reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation, and maintenance of health literacy practices.

Implementation: Over 18 months, the CARE team delivered multiple implementation strategies, including external facilitator, microlessons, preparing champions, audit and feedback, local consensus discussions, and small test of change. We tailored health literacy practices to clinic team roles to accommodate the clinic workflow.

Results: ENT team mean ratings on acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility remained >4 indicating a high likelihood of successful implementation. Caregiver always ratings significantly increased from baseline to 12 months for easy-to-understand medication instructions (74%-96%), test results (54%-96%), know what to do if had questions (89%-96%), and encouraged to talk about health problems (76%-90%). Caregiver ratings dropped slightly at 18 months, indicating a need for booster training. While one third of caregivers reported Teach-Back practice across all time periods, the ENT team reported increased practice from baseline (42%), 6 (61%) and 12 months (70%).

Lessons learned: Over the first 12 months, the external facilitator delivered implementation strategies with weekly contact, tapering contact over the final 6 months. The local champion became engaged in the CARE study through a quality improvement project with meaningful outcomes for the clinic and an incentivization program for scholarly endeavors. Lunch and learn sessions helped build relationships between the CARE and ENT team to discuss and problem solve issues. The 5-item CAHPS health literacy composite proved to be sensitive to changes during implementation of health literacy practices. Integrating these items into standard follow up surveys with patients and families would help realize the return on investment for health literacy implementation. [HLRP: Health Literacy Research and Practice. 2024;8(3):e166-e174.].

为护理而沟通:在儿科耳鼻喉诊所实施健康扫盲。
背景:尽管对照试验取得了积极成果,但医疗机构在采用健康素养实践方面进展缓慢。Communicate to CARE(清晰沟通、通过回授实现理解、响应患者家庭需求、提供富有同情心的护理)研究旨在利用实施科学的理论和策略,在一家儿科耳鼻喉科诊所推广健康素养实践:以往的工作只是对障碍进行反思,在此基础上,CARE 小组在实施前确定了当地环境中的障碍,以选择在健康素养实施过程中直接解决障碍的策略。采用 RE-AIM 框架来评估健康素养实践的覆盖范围、有效性、采用、实施和维护情况:在 18 个月的时间里,CARE 团队实施了多种实施策略,包括外部促进者、微型课程、准备倡导者、审核和反馈、地方共识讨论和小型变革测试。我们根据诊所团队的角色调整了健康知识普及实践,以适应诊所的工作流程:耳鼻喉科团队对可接受性、适宜性和可行性的平均评分仍大于 4 分,表明成功实施的可能性很高。从基线到 12 个月期间,护理人员对易于理解的用药指导(74%-96%)、检查结果(54%-96%)、有问题时知道该怎么做(89%-96%)和鼓励谈论健康问题(76%-90%)的评分均有明显提高。护理人员的评分在 18 个月时略有下降,表明需要加强培训。虽然三分之一的护理人员在所有时间段内都报告了 "背教 "实践,但耳鼻喉科团队报告说,从基线(42%)、6 个月(61%)到 12 个月(70%),"背教 "实践有所增加:在最初的 12 个月中,外部促进者每周都会联系,提供实施策略,并在最后 6 个月中逐渐减少联系。当地支持者通过质量改进项目参与了 CARE 研究,该项目为诊所带来了有意义的成果,并为学术研究提供了激励计划。午餐和学习会议有助于在 CARE 团队和耳鼻喉科团队之间建立关系,以讨论和解决问题。事实证明,CAHPS 健康素养综合评估的 5 个项目对健康素养实践实施过程中的变化非常敏感。将这些项目纳入对患者和家属的标准随访调查将有助于实现健康素养实施的投资回报。[HLRP:健康素养研究与实践。2024;8(3):e166-e174]。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health literacy research and practice
Health literacy research and practice Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
审稿时长
36 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信