Determinants of Successful Implementation of Assistive Technologies for Dementia: Exploratory Survey.

IF 5 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
JMIR Aging Pub Date : 2024-09-13 DOI:10.2196/53640
Henriëtte Geralde Van der Roest, Hannah Liane Christie, Manuel Angel Franco-Martin, Rose-Marie Dröes, Marjolein Elizabeth de Vugt, Franka Meiland
{"title":"Determinants of Successful Implementation of Assistive Technologies for Dementia: Exploratory Survey.","authors":"Henriëtte Geralde Van der Roest, Hannah Liane Christie, Manuel Angel Franco-Martin, Rose-Marie Dröes, Marjolein Elizabeth de Vugt, Franka Meiland","doi":"10.2196/53640","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite positive results for the use of assistive technologies (ATs) in dementia, the uptake of ATs lags behind. It is considered important to assess determinants of successful or unsuccessful implementation of ATs.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We explored factors that influence the implementation of ATs for community-dwelling people with dementia, with the aim to better understand potentially effective implementation strategies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional survey for researchers was developed and disseminated, exploring factors that influence either successful or unsuccessful implementation of ATs for dementia. The survey consisted of closed and open questions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The response rate was 10% (21/206); the 21 respondents who completed the survey were from 8 countries. Determinants of implementation were described for 21 ATs, of which 12 were successfully and 9 were unsuccessfully implemented. Various types of ATs were included, such as online platforms, sensors, or physical aids. The main determinants of implementation success were related to the AT itself, contextual factors, research activities, and implementation strategies. There was a lack of research data on some ethical issues and cost-effectiveness.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study provided insight into some main barriers to and facilitators of implementation of ATs in dementia related to the AT itself, context, research-related activities, and applied implementation strategies. Lessons were formulated for various stakeholders to improve the implementation effectiveness of ATs in dementia.</p>","PeriodicalId":36245,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Aging","volume":"7 ","pages":"e53640"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11440069/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR Aging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/53640","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Despite positive results for the use of assistive technologies (ATs) in dementia, the uptake of ATs lags behind. It is considered important to assess determinants of successful or unsuccessful implementation of ATs.

Objective: We explored factors that influence the implementation of ATs for community-dwelling people with dementia, with the aim to better understand potentially effective implementation strategies.

Methods: A cross-sectional survey for researchers was developed and disseminated, exploring factors that influence either successful or unsuccessful implementation of ATs for dementia. The survey consisted of closed and open questions.

Results: The response rate was 10% (21/206); the 21 respondents who completed the survey were from 8 countries. Determinants of implementation were described for 21 ATs, of which 12 were successfully and 9 were unsuccessfully implemented. Various types of ATs were included, such as online platforms, sensors, or physical aids. The main determinants of implementation success were related to the AT itself, contextual factors, research activities, and implementation strategies. There was a lack of research data on some ethical issues and cost-effectiveness.

Conclusions: This study provided insight into some main barriers to and facilitators of implementation of ATs in dementia related to the AT itself, context, research-related activities, and applied implementation strategies. Lessons were formulated for various stakeholders to improve the implementation effectiveness of ATs in dementia.

成功实施痴呆症辅助技术的决定因素:探索性调查。
背景:尽管在痴呆症患者中使用辅助技术(ATs)取得了积极的成果,但辅助技术的应用却相对滞后。我们认为,评估辅助技术成功或失败的决定因素非常重要:我们探讨了影响社区痴呆症患者使用辅助工具的因素,旨在更好地了解潜在的有效实施策略:我们为研究人员制定并发布了一项横向调查,探讨影响痴呆症患者辅助器具成功或失败实施的因素。调查包括封闭式问题和开放式问题:答复率为 10%(21/206);完成调查的 21 名受访者来自 8 个国家。调查描述了 21 种辅助器具的实施决定因素,其中 12 种成功实施,9 种失败实施。其中包括各种类型的辅助工具,如在线平台、传感器或物理辅助工具。成功实施的主要决定因素与辅助器具本身、环境因素、研究活动和实施策略有关。在一些伦理问题和成本效益方面缺乏研究数据:本研究深入探讨了在痴呆症患者中实施智能辅助工具的一些主要障碍和促进因素,这些障碍和因素与智能辅助工具本身、背景、研究相关活动和应用实施策略有关。研究还为各利益相关方提供了经验教训,以提高痴呆症视听设备的实施效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JMIR Aging
JMIR Aging Social Sciences-Health (social science)
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
4.10%
发文量
71
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信