Anterior decompression and posterior total laminectomy with fusion for ossification of the cervical posterior longitudinal ligament.

IF 2.8 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Kefu Chen, Xingcheng Dong, Yiwei Lu, Jian Zhang, Xiaodong Liu, Lianshun Jia, Ying Guo, Xiongsheng Chen
{"title":"Anterior decompression and posterior total laminectomy with fusion for ossification of the cervical posterior longitudinal ligament.","authors":"Kefu Chen, Xingcheng Dong, Yiwei Lu, Jian Zhang, Xiaodong Liu, Lianshun Jia, Ying Guo, Xiongsheng Chen","doi":"10.1302/2633-1462.59.BJO-2024-0041.R1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Surgical approaches to cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) remain controversial. The purpose of the present study was to analyze and compare the long-term neurological recovery following anterior decompression with fusion (ADF) and posterior laminectomy and fusion with bone graft and internal fixation (PLF) based on > ten-year follow-up outcomes in a single centre.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Included in this retrospective cohort study were 48 patients (12 females; mean age 55.79 years (SD 8.94)) who were diagnosed with cervical OPLL, received treatment in our centre, and were followed up for 10.22 to 15.25 years. Of them, 24 patients (six females; mean age 52.88 years (SD 8.79)) received ADF, and the other 24 patients (five females; mean age 56.25 years (SD 9.44)) received PLF. Clinical data including age, sex, and the OPLL canal-occupying ratio were analyzed and compared. The primary outcome was Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, and the secondary outcome was visual analogue scale neck pain.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared with the baseline, neurological function improved significantly after surgery in all patients of both groups (p < 0.001). The JOA recovery rate in the ADF group was significantly higher than that in the PLF group (p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in postoperative cervical pain between the two groups (p = 0.387). The operating time was longer and intraoperative blood loss was greater in the PLF group than the ADF group. More complications were observed in the ADF group than in the PLF group, although the difference was not statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Long-term neurological function improved significantly after surgery in both groups, with the improvement more pronounced in the ADF group. There was no significant difference in postoperative neck pain between the two groups. The operating time was shorter and intraoperative blood loss was lower in the ADF group; however, the incidence of perioperative complications was higher.</p>","PeriodicalId":34103,"journal":{"name":"Bone & Joint Open","volume":"5 9","pages":"768-775"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11407878/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bone & Joint Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1302/2633-1462.59.BJO-2024-0041.R1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: Surgical approaches to cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) remain controversial. The purpose of the present study was to analyze and compare the long-term neurological recovery following anterior decompression with fusion (ADF) and posterior laminectomy and fusion with bone graft and internal fixation (PLF) based on > ten-year follow-up outcomes in a single centre.

Methods: Included in this retrospective cohort study were 48 patients (12 females; mean age 55.79 years (SD 8.94)) who were diagnosed with cervical OPLL, received treatment in our centre, and were followed up for 10.22 to 15.25 years. Of them, 24 patients (six females; mean age 52.88 years (SD 8.79)) received ADF, and the other 24 patients (five females; mean age 56.25 years (SD 9.44)) received PLF. Clinical data including age, sex, and the OPLL canal-occupying ratio were analyzed and compared. The primary outcome was Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, and the secondary outcome was visual analogue scale neck pain.

Results: Compared with the baseline, neurological function improved significantly after surgery in all patients of both groups (p < 0.001). The JOA recovery rate in the ADF group was significantly higher than that in the PLF group (p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in postoperative cervical pain between the two groups (p = 0.387). The operating time was longer and intraoperative blood loss was greater in the PLF group than the ADF group. More complications were observed in the ADF group than in the PLF group, although the difference was not statistically significant.

Conclusion: Long-term neurological function improved significantly after surgery in both groups, with the improvement more pronounced in the ADF group. There was no significant difference in postoperative neck pain between the two groups. The operating time was shorter and intraoperative blood loss was lower in the ADF group; however, the incidence of perioperative complications was higher.

治疗颈椎后纵韧带骨化的前路减压和后路全椎板切除加融合术。
目的:针对颈椎后纵韧带骨化(OPLL)的手术方法仍存在争议。本研究的目的是分析和比较前路减压加融合术(ADF)和后路椎板切除加植骨和内固定融合术(PLF)的长期神经功能恢复情况:这项回顾性队列研究共纳入48例患者(女性12例,平均年龄55.79岁(SD 8.94)),他们被诊断为颈椎OPLL,在本中心接受了治疗,随访时间为10.22至15.25年。其中,24 名患者(6 名女性;平均年龄 52.88 岁(SD 8.79))接受了 ADF 治疗,另外 24 名患者(5 名女性;平均年龄 56.25 岁(SD 9.44))接受了 PLF 治疗。对包括年龄、性别和 OPLL 管占据比率在内的临床数据进行了分析和比较。主要结果是日本骨科协会(JOA)评分,次要结果是颈部疼痛视觉模拟量表:与基线相比,两组所有患者术后的神经功能均有明显改善(P < 0.001)。ADF组的JOA恢复率明显高于PLF组(P < 0.001)。两组患者术后颈椎疼痛无明显差异(P = 0.387)。与ADF组相比,PLF组的手术时间更长,术中失血量更多。ADF组的并发症多于PLF组,但差异无统计学意义:结论:两组患者术后的长期神经功能均有明显改善,ADF组的改善更为明显。两组患者术后颈部疼痛无明显差异。ADF组的手术时间更短,术中失血量更少;但围手术期并发症的发生率更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Bone & Joint Open
Bone & Joint Open ORTHOPEDICS-
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信