The prognostic significance of circulating tumor DNA in patients with positive lymph node disease after robotic-assisted radical cystectomy: A contemporary analysis.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Reuben Ben-David, Sarah Lidagoster, Jack Geduldig, Kaushik P Kolanukuduru, Yuval Elkun, Neeraja Tillu, Shivaram Cumarasamy, Jordan M Rich, Mohammed Almoflihi, Kyrollis Attalla, Reza Mehrazin, Peter Wiklund, John P Sfakianos
{"title":"The prognostic significance of circulating tumor DNA in patients with positive lymph node disease after robotic-assisted radical cystectomy: A contemporary analysis.","authors":"Reuben Ben-David, Sarah Lidagoster, Jack Geduldig, Kaushik P Kolanukuduru, Yuval Elkun, Neeraja Tillu, Shivaram Cumarasamy, Jordan M Rich, Mohammed Almoflihi, Kyrollis Attalla, Reza Mehrazin, Peter Wiklund, John P Sfakianos","doi":"10.1016/j.urolonc.2024.08.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Neoadjuvant therapy followed by radical cystectomy with lymphadenectomy remains the gold standard of treatment in patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Pathologically positive lymph node (pN+) disease is known to convey a poor prognosis. Tumor-informed circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) has emerged as a possible novel prognostic biomarker in the field. We seek to assess recurrence-free survival (RFS) for patients undergoing robotic-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) with extended pelvic lymphadenectomy (ePLND) and to assess whether ctDNA status can be a prognostic marker for RFS outcomes in patients with pN+ disease.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients who underwent RARC + ePLND during 2015 to 2023 were included. A sub-group analysis (n = 109) of patients who had prospectively collected serial-longitudinal tumor-informed ctDNA analyses during 2021-2023 was performed. Survival analysis and Cox-regression models were conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Included were 458 patients with a median age of 69 (IQR 63-76), and a median follow-up time of 20 months (IQR 10-37). RFS for pN0 (n = 353) and pN+ (n = 105) at 12, 24 and 36 months were 87% vs. 54%, 80% vs. 39%, and 74% vs. 35%, respectively (log-rank, P < 0.0001). On Cox multivariate analysis ≥pT3 disease (Hazzard ratio [HR] = 3.36 [2.18-5.18], P < 0.001), pN+ disease (HR = 2.39 [1.55-3.7], P < 0.001), and recipients of neoadjuvant treatment (HR = 1.61 [1.11-2.34], P = 0.013) were predictive of disease relapse. Patients with pN+ disease and undetectable precystectomy or postcystectomy ctDNA status had similar RFS to patients with pN0 with undetectable ctDNA. On Cox-regression multivariate sub-group analysis, detectable precystectomy ctDNA status (HR = 3.89 [1.32-11.4], P = 0.014), detectable ctDNA status in the minimal residual disease window ([MRD], HR = 2.89 [1.12-7.47], P = 0.028), and having ≥pT3 with pN+ disease (HR = 4.2 [1.43-12.3], P = 0.009) were predictive of disease relapse.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients with pN+ .after RARC had worse oncological outcomes than patients with pN0 disease. Undetectable ctDNA status was informative of RFS regardless of nodal status at both the precystectomy and the MRD window. Patients with undetectable ctDNA status and pN+ disease may benefit from treatment de-escalation.</p>","PeriodicalId":23408,"journal":{"name":"Urologic Oncology-seminars and Original Investigations","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urologic Oncology-seminars and Original Investigations","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urolonc.2024.08.006","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objective: Neoadjuvant therapy followed by radical cystectomy with lymphadenectomy remains the gold standard of treatment in patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Pathologically positive lymph node (pN+) disease is known to convey a poor prognosis. Tumor-informed circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) has emerged as a possible novel prognostic biomarker in the field. We seek to assess recurrence-free survival (RFS) for patients undergoing robotic-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) with extended pelvic lymphadenectomy (ePLND) and to assess whether ctDNA status can be a prognostic marker for RFS outcomes in patients with pN+ disease.

Methods: Patients who underwent RARC + ePLND during 2015 to 2023 were included. A sub-group analysis (n = 109) of patients who had prospectively collected serial-longitudinal tumor-informed ctDNA analyses during 2021-2023 was performed. Survival analysis and Cox-regression models were conducted.

Results: Included were 458 patients with a median age of 69 (IQR 63-76), and a median follow-up time of 20 months (IQR 10-37). RFS for pN0 (n = 353) and pN+ (n = 105) at 12, 24 and 36 months were 87% vs. 54%, 80% vs. 39%, and 74% vs. 35%, respectively (log-rank, P < 0.0001). On Cox multivariate analysis ≥pT3 disease (Hazzard ratio [HR] = 3.36 [2.18-5.18], P < 0.001), pN+ disease (HR = 2.39 [1.55-3.7], P < 0.001), and recipients of neoadjuvant treatment (HR = 1.61 [1.11-2.34], P = 0.013) were predictive of disease relapse. Patients with pN+ disease and undetectable precystectomy or postcystectomy ctDNA status had similar RFS to patients with pN0 with undetectable ctDNA. On Cox-regression multivariate sub-group analysis, detectable precystectomy ctDNA status (HR = 3.89 [1.32-11.4], P = 0.014), detectable ctDNA status in the minimal residual disease window ([MRD], HR = 2.89 [1.12-7.47], P = 0.028), and having ≥pT3 with pN+ disease (HR = 4.2 [1.43-12.3], P = 0.009) were predictive of disease relapse.

Conclusions: Patients with pN+ .after RARC had worse oncological outcomes than patients with pN0 disease. Undetectable ctDNA status was informative of RFS regardless of nodal status at both the precystectomy and the MRD window. Patients with undetectable ctDNA status and pN+ disease may benefit from treatment de-escalation.

机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术后淋巴结阳性患者循环肿瘤DNA的预后意义:当代分析。
背景和目的:新辅助治疗后进行根治性膀胱切除术和淋巴结切除术仍是治疗肌层浸润性膀胱癌患者的金标准。病理淋巴结阳性(pN+)疾病预后较差。肿瘤信息循环肿瘤 DNA(ctDNA)已成为该领域可能的新型预后生物标志物。我们试图评估接受机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术(RARC)并进行扩大盆腔淋巴结切除术(ePLND)的患者的无复发生存期(RFS),并评估ctDNA状态是否可作为pN+疾病患者RFS结果的预后标志物:纳入2015年至2023年期间接受RARC + ePLND的患者。对在 2021-2023 年期间进行了前瞻性纵向肿瘤信息 ctDNA 分析的患者(n = 109)进行了亚组分析。进行了生存分析和Cox回归模型:结果:共纳入 458 例患者,中位年龄为 69 岁(IQR 63-76),中位随访时间为 20 个月(IQR 10-37)。pN0(353 人)和 pN+ (105 人)在 12、24 和 36 个月时的 RFS 分别为 87% 对 54%、80% 对 39% 和 74% 对 35%(对数秩,P < 0.0001)。在Cox多变量分析中,≥pT3疾病(哈扎德比值[HR] = 3.36 [2.18-5.18],P <0.001)、pN+疾病(HR = 2.39 [1.55-3.7],P <0.001)和接受新辅助治疗者(HR = 1.61 [1.11-2.34],P = 0.013)是疾病复发的预测因素。患有pN+疾病且在子宫切除术前或切除术后检测不到ctDNA的患者与患有pN0且检测不到ctDNA的患者的RFS相似。在 Cox 回归多变量亚组分析中,可检测到子宫切除术前 ctDNA 状态(HR = 3.89 [1.32-11.4],P = 0.014)、可检测到最小残留疾病窗内 ctDNA 状态([MRD],HR = 2.89 [1.12-7.47],P = 0.028)、≥pT3 伴有 pN+ 疾病(HR = 4.2 [1.43-12.3],P = 0.009)是疾病复发的预测因素:结论:与 pN0 患者相比,RARC 后 pN+ .患者的肿瘤预后更差。无论在子宫切除术前和MRD窗口期的结节状态如何,检测不到ctDNA的状态都能预测RFS。ctDNA检测不到且病情为pN+的患者可能会从降级治疗中获益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
3.70%
发文量
297
审稿时长
7.6 weeks
期刊介绍: Urologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations is the official journal of the Society of Urologic Oncology. The journal publishes practical, timely, and relevant clinical and basic science research articles which address any aspect of urologic oncology. Each issue comprises original research, news and topics, survey articles providing short commentaries on other important articles in the urologic oncology literature, and reviews including an in-depth Seminar examining a specific clinical dilemma. The journal periodically publishes supplement issues devoted to areas of current interest to the urologic oncology community. Articles published are of interest to researchers and the clinicians involved in the practice of urologic oncology including urologists, oncologists, and radiologists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信