Deceased Organ Donor HTLV Screening Practices Postelimination of Universal Screening in the United States.

IF 1.9 Q3 TRANSPLANTATION
Transplantation Direct Pub Date : 2024-09-17 eCollection Date: 2024-10-01 DOI:10.1097/TXD.0000000000001707
Junji Yamauchi, Divya Raghavan, Hannah Imlay, Duha Jweehan, Suayp Oygen, Silviana Marineci, Adam Remport, Isaac E Hall, Miklos Z Molnar
{"title":"Deceased Organ Donor HTLV Screening Practices Postelimination of Universal Screening in the United States.","authors":"Junji Yamauchi, Divya Raghavan, Hannah Imlay, Duha Jweehan, Suayp Oygen, Silviana Marineci, Adam Remport, Isaac E Hall, Miklos Z Molnar","doi":"10.1097/TXD.0000000000001707","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In the United States, universal screening for human T-lymphotropic virus (HTLV) in deceased organ donors was discontinued in 2009. Since then, the transplant guideline suggests considering targeted screening. However, the outcomes of this change in HTLV screening have not been evaluated.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network database between 2010 and 2022, we analyzed the HTLV antibody screening frequency and seroprevalence in potential deceased organ donors and their correlations with HTLV infection risks, including race and high-risk behaviors for blood-borne pathogen infection. Although targeted screening has not been established for HTLV, we hypothesized that screening rates should correlate with the proportions of donors with infection risk if screening is targeted. We also evaluated the organ utilization of HTLV-seropositive donors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 130 284 potential organ donors, 22 032 (16.9%) were tested for HTLV antibody. The proportion of donors tested for HTLV varied between Organ Procurement Organizations (median [interquartile range], 3.8% [1.0%-23.2%]; range, 0.2%-99.4%) and was not correlated to HTLV infection risks. There were 48 seropositive donors (0.22%), and at least 1 organ from 42 of these donors (87.5%) was transplanted. The number of organs recovered and transplanted per donor was significantly lower in HTLV-seropositive than in HTLV-negative donors (recovered, 2 [2-3] versus 3 [3-5], <i>P </i>< 0.001; transplanted, 2 [1-3] versus 3 [2-4], <i>P</i> < 0.001). However, HTLV-1 infection was not attributed as the cause of nonrecovery except for only 1 HTLV-seropositive donor.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>HTLV screening practices varied across the United States. Our findings suggest that targeted screening was not performed after the elimination of universal screening.</p>","PeriodicalId":23225,"journal":{"name":"Transplantation Direct","volume":"10 10","pages":"e1707"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11410323/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transplantation Direct","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/TXD.0000000000001707","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"TRANSPLANTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In the United States, universal screening for human T-lymphotropic virus (HTLV) in deceased organ donors was discontinued in 2009. Since then, the transplant guideline suggests considering targeted screening. However, the outcomes of this change in HTLV screening have not been evaluated.

Methods: Using the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network database between 2010 and 2022, we analyzed the HTLV antibody screening frequency and seroprevalence in potential deceased organ donors and their correlations with HTLV infection risks, including race and high-risk behaviors for blood-borne pathogen infection. Although targeted screening has not been established for HTLV, we hypothesized that screening rates should correlate with the proportions of donors with infection risk if screening is targeted. We also evaluated the organ utilization of HTLV-seropositive donors.

Results: Of 130 284 potential organ donors, 22 032 (16.9%) were tested for HTLV antibody. The proportion of donors tested for HTLV varied between Organ Procurement Organizations (median [interquartile range], 3.8% [1.0%-23.2%]; range, 0.2%-99.4%) and was not correlated to HTLV infection risks. There were 48 seropositive donors (0.22%), and at least 1 organ from 42 of these donors (87.5%) was transplanted. The number of organs recovered and transplanted per donor was significantly lower in HTLV-seropositive than in HTLV-negative donors (recovered, 2 [2-3] versus 3 [3-5], P < 0.001; transplanted, 2 [1-3] versus 3 [2-4], P < 0.001). However, HTLV-1 infection was not attributed as the cause of nonrecovery except for only 1 HTLV-seropositive donor.

Conclusions: HTLV screening practices varied across the United States. Our findings suggest that targeted screening was not performed after the elimination of universal screening.

美国取消普遍筛查后的器官捐献者HTLV筛查实践。
背景:在美国,2009 年停止了对已故器官捐献者进行人类 T 淋巴细胞病毒(HTLV)的普遍筛查。此后,移植指南建议考虑进行有针对性的筛查。然而,尚未对 HTLV 筛查这一变化的结果进行评估:方法:我们利用 2010 年至 2022 年间的器官获取与移植网络数据库,分析了潜在器官捐献者的 HTLV 抗体筛查频率和血清流行率,以及它们与 HTLV 感染风险(包括种族和血液传播病原体感染的高危行为)的相关性。虽然尚未建立针对 HTLV 的定向筛查,但我们假设,如果筛查是有针对性的,那么筛查率应与有感染风险的捐献者比例相关。我们还评估了 HTLV 血清阳性捐献者的器官利用情况:在 130 284 名潜在器官捐献者中,22 032 人(16.9%)接受了 HTLV 抗体检测。接受 HTLV 检测的捐献者比例在器官获取组织之间存在差异(中位数[四分位数间距],3.8% [1.0%-23.2%];范围,0.2%-99.4%),且与 HTLV 感染风险无关。血清反应呈阳性的捐献者有 48 人(0.22%),其中 42 人(87.5%)的至少一个器官被移植。HTLV血清反应阳性捐献者的人均器官复苏和移植数量明显低于HTLV阴性捐献者(复苏,2[2-3]对3[3-5],P P 结论:美国各地的 HTLV 筛查方法各不相同。我们的研究结果表明,在取消普遍筛查后,并没有进行有针对性的筛查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Transplantation Direct
Transplantation Direct TRANSPLANTATION-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
4.30%
发文量
193
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信