Feasibility and safety of transarterial chemoembolization in patients with liver cancer via the distal radial approach: a single-center retrospective cohort study.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q4 ONCOLOGY
Translational cancer research Pub Date : 2024-08-31 Epub Date: 2024-08-26 DOI:10.21037/tcr-24-1231
Xinsen Wang, Lei Xian, Wenlei Zhang, Yang Xu, Delong Zhao, Xue Wang
{"title":"Feasibility and safety of transarterial chemoembolization in patients with liver cancer via the distal radial approach: a single-center retrospective cohort study.","authors":"Xinsen Wang, Lei Xian, Wenlei Zhang, Yang Xu, Delong Zhao, Xue Wang","doi":"10.21037/tcr-24-1231","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The femoral artery is the standard route for transarterial chemoembolization (TACE); however, it is negatively associated with the quality of life of patients, and carries an increased risk of deep vein thrombosis in the lower limbs. We employed the distal radial approach to TACE to assess its feasibility and safety.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective study at the First Hospital of Jilin University from August 1, 2020 to October 31, 2023. To be eligible for inclusion in the study, the patients had to meet the following main inclusion criteria: (I) have undergone a preoperative imaging (abdominal computed tomography enhancement or magnetic resonance dynamic enhancement) examination, or have a pathologically confirmed diagnosis of primary liver cancer, and a Child-Pugh score of A or B; and (II) have undergone distal radial artery puncture. The primary endpoint of this study was the success rate of distal radial artery puncture. The secondary endpoints were complications and the duration of the puncture.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 343 patients with primary liver cancer (of whom 236 were male and 107 were female), a total of 1,315 distal radial artery punctures were attempted. The success rate was remarkably high at 95.13% (1,251/1,315), with only 64 cases requiring an alternative approach due to failed puncture. The average puncture duration was 20±7.43 minutes. No bleeding and hematoma, no arterial dissection and pseudoaneurysm formation were observed on ultrasound, and the radial pulse was palpable in all patients, highlighting the safety of the procedure. Further, no adverse events of vascular occlusion were observed among the 12 patients who received 6 or more punctures, indicating the sustainability of the distal radial artery access under the premise of adequate vascular protection. The development of this technique requires a learning curve of at least 50 cases to break through the learning baseline and be proficient in distal radial artery blind puncture. This may be the reason why many interventional physicians are reluctant to perform this procedure, adapting to the femoral approach with a shorter learning curve.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The distal radial artery approach is feasible and safe in hepatic arterial chemoembolization, and should be widely promoted in TACE.</p>","PeriodicalId":23216,"journal":{"name":"Translational cancer research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11385528/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Translational cancer research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/tcr-24-1231","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The femoral artery is the standard route for transarterial chemoembolization (TACE); however, it is negatively associated with the quality of life of patients, and carries an increased risk of deep vein thrombosis in the lower limbs. We employed the distal radial approach to TACE to assess its feasibility and safety.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective study at the First Hospital of Jilin University from August 1, 2020 to October 31, 2023. To be eligible for inclusion in the study, the patients had to meet the following main inclusion criteria: (I) have undergone a preoperative imaging (abdominal computed tomography enhancement or magnetic resonance dynamic enhancement) examination, or have a pathologically confirmed diagnosis of primary liver cancer, and a Child-Pugh score of A or B; and (II) have undergone distal radial artery puncture. The primary endpoint of this study was the success rate of distal radial artery puncture. The secondary endpoints were complications and the duration of the puncture.

Results: Among the 343 patients with primary liver cancer (of whom 236 were male and 107 were female), a total of 1,315 distal radial artery punctures were attempted. The success rate was remarkably high at 95.13% (1,251/1,315), with only 64 cases requiring an alternative approach due to failed puncture. The average puncture duration was 20±7.43 minutes. No bleeding and hematoma, no arterial dissection and pseudoaneurysm formation were observed on ultrasound, and the radial pulse was palpable in all patients, highlighting the safety of the procedure. Further, no adverse events of vascular occlusion were observed among the 12 patients who received 6 or more punctures, indicating the sustainability of the distal radial artery access under the premise of adequate vascular protection. The development of this technique requires a learning curve of at least 50 cases to break through the learning baseline and be proficient in distal radial artery blind puncture. This may be the reason why many interventional physicians are reluctant to perform this procedure, adapting to the femoral approach with a shorter learning curve.

Conclusions: The distal radial artery approach is feasible and safe in hepatic arterial chemoembolization, and should be widely promoted in TACE.

肝癌患者经远端桡动脉途径进行经动脉化疗栓塞的可行性和安全性:一项单中心回顾性队列研究。
背景:股动脉是经动脉化疗栓塞术(TACE)的标准途径;然而,它与患者的生活质量有负面关系,并增加了下肢深静脉血栓形成的风险。我们采用桡骨远端方法进行 TACE,以评估其可行性和安全性:我们于 2020 年 8 月 1 日至 2023 年 10 月 31 日在吉林大学第一医院进行了一项回顾性研究。患者必须符合以下主要纳入标准,方可纳入研究:(I)接受过术前成像(腹部计算机断层扫描增强或磁共振动态增强)检查,或经病理确诊为原发性肝癌,且 Child-Pugh 评分为 A 或 B;以及(II)接受过桡动脉远端穿刺。本研究的主要终点是桡动脉远端穿刺的成功率。次要终点是并发症和穿刺持续时间:在343名原发性肝癌患者(其中男性236人,女性107人)中,共尝试了1315次桡动脉远端穿刺。成功率高达 95.13%(1,251/1,315),仅有 64 例因穿刺失败而需要采用其他方法。平均穿刺时间为 20±7.43 分钟。超声波检查未发现出血和血肿,也未发现动脉夹层和假性动脉瘤的形成,所有患者均可触摸到桡动脉搏动,突出了手术的安全性。此外,在接受 6 次或 6 次以上穿刺的 12 名患者中,未发现血管闭塞的不良事件,这表明在充分保护血管的前提下,桡动脉远端入路是可持续的。这项技术的发展需要至少 50 例的学习曲线,才能突破学习基线,熟练掌握桡动脉远端盲穿技术。这可能是许多介入医生不愿意进行这种手术的原因,他们更愿意采用学习曲线更短的股动脉方法:结论:桡动脉远端入路在肝动脉化疗栓塞术中可行且安全,应在 TACE 中广泛推广。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
252
期刊介绍: Translational Cancer Research (Transl Cancer Res TCR; Print ISSN: 2218-676X; Online ISSN 2219-6803; http://tcr.amegroups.com/) is an Open Access, peer-reviewed journal, indexed in Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE). TCR publishes laboratory studies of novel therapeutic interventions as well as clinical trials which evaluate new treatment paradigms for cancer; results of novel research investigations which bridge the laboratory and clinical settings including risk assessment, cellular and molecular characterization, prevention, detection, diagnosis and treatment of human cancers with the overall goal of improving the clinical care of cancer patients. The focus of TCR is original, peer-reviewed, science-based research that successfully advances clinical medicine toward the goal of improving patients'' quality of life. The editors and an international advisory group of scientists and clinician-scientists as well as other experts will hold TCR articles to the high-quality standards. We accept Original Articles as well as Review Articles, Editorials and Brief Articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信