Phylogenomics of Bivalvia Using Ultraconserved Elements (UCEs) Reveal New Topologies for Pteriomorphia and Imparidentia.

IF 6.1 1区 生物学 Q1 EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY
Yi-Xuan Li, Jack Chi-Ho Ip, Chong Chen, Ting Xu, Qian Zhang, Yanan Sun, Pei-Zhen Ma, Jian-Wen Qiu
{"title":"Phylogenomics of Bivalvia Using Ultraconserved Elements (UCEs) Reveal New Topologies for Pteriomorphia and Imparidentia.","authors":"Yi-Xuan Li, Jack Chi-Ho Ip, Chong Chen, Ting Xu, Qian Zhang, Yanan Sun, Pei-Zhen Ma, Jian-Wen Qiu","doi":"10.1093/sysbio/syae052","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Despite significant advances in phylogenetics over the past decades, the deep relationships within Bivalvia (phylum Mollusca) remain inconclusive. Previous efforts based on morphology or several genes have failed to resolve many key nodes in the phylogeny of Bivalvia. Advances have been made recently using transcriptome data, but the phylogenetic relationships within Bivalvia historically lacked consensus, especially within Pteriomorphia and Imparidentia. Here, we inferred the relationships of key lineages within Bivalvia using matrices generated from specifically designed ultraconserved elements (UCEs) with 16 available genomic resources and 85 newly sequenced specimens from 55 families. Our new probes (Bivalve UCE 2k v.1) for target sequencing captured an average of 849 UCEs with 1085-bp in mean length from in vitro experiments. Our results introduced novel schemes from six major clades (Protobranchina, Pteriomorphia, Palaeoheterodonta, Archiheterodonta, Anomalodesmata and Imparidentia), though some inner nodes were poorly resolved, such as paraphyletic Heterodonta in some topologies potentially due to insufficient taxon sampling. The resolution increased when analyzing specific matrices for Pteriomorphia and Imparidentia. We recovered three Pteriomorphia topologies different from previously published trees, with the strongest support for ((Ostreida + (Arcida + Mytilida)) + (Pectinida + (Limida + Pectinida))). Limida were nested within Pectinida, warranting further studies. For Imparidentia, our results strongly supported the new hypothesis of (Galeommatida + (Adapedonta + Cardiida)), while the possible non-monophyly of Lucinida was inferred but poorly supported. Overall, our results provide important insights into the phylogeny of Bivalvia and show that target enrichment sequencing of UCEs can be broadly applied to study both deep and shallow phylogenetic relationships.</p>","PeriodicalId":22120,"journal":{"name":"Systematic Biology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Systematic Biology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/syae052","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite significant advances in phylogenetics over the past decades, the deep relationships within Bivalvia (phylum Mollusca) remain inconclusive. Previous efforts based on morphology or several genes have failed to resolve many key nodes in the phylogeny of Bivalvia. Advances have been made recently using transcriptome data, but the phylogenetic relationships within Bivalvia historically lacked consensus, especially within Pteriomorphia and Imparidentia. Here, we inferred the relationships of key lineages within Bivalvia using matrices generated from specifically designed ultraconserved elements (UCEs) with 16 available genomic resources and 85 newly sequenced specimens from 55 families. Our new probes (Bivalve UCE 2k v.1) for target sequencing captured an average of 849 UCEs with 1085-bp in mean length from in vitro experiments. Our results introduced novel schemes from six major clades (Protobranchina, Pteriomorphia, Palaeoheterodonta, Archiheterodonta, Anomalodesmata and Imparidentia), though some inner nodes were poorly resolved, such as paraphyletic Heterodonta in some topologies potentially due to insufficient taxon sampling. The resolution increased when analyzing specific matrices for Pteriomorphia and Imparidentia. We recovered three Pteriomorphia topologies different from previously published trees, with the strongest support for ((Ostreida + (Arcida + Mytilida)) + (Pectinida + (Limida + Pectinida))). Limida were nested within Pectinida, warranting further studies. For Imparidentia, our results strongly supported the new hypothesis of (Galeommatida + (Adapedonta + Cardiida)), while the possible non-monophyly of Lucinida was inferred but poorly supported. Overall, our results provide important insights into the phylogeny of Bivalvia and show that target enrichment sequencing of UCEs can be broadly applied to study both deep and shallow phylogenetic relationships.

使用超保守元素(UCEs)的双壳类系统发生组学揭示了翼手目和翼手目的新拓扑结构。
尽管过去几十年来系统发生学取得了重大进展,但双壳纲动物(软体动物门)内部的深层关系仍未确定。以前基于形态学或几个基因的研究未能解决双壳纲系统发育中的许多关键节点。最近,利用转录组数据的研究取得了进展,但双壳纲的系统发育关系历来缺乏共识,尤其是翼手目(Pteriomorphia)和栉水母目(Imparidentia)的系统发育关系。在此,我们利用专门设计的超保守元素(UCEs)矩阵,结合 16 个可用的基因组资源和 55 个科的 85 个新测序标本,推断了双壳纲内关键种系的关系。我们用于目标测序的新探针(Bivalve UCE 2k v.1)从体外实验中平均捕获了 849 个 UCE,平均长度为 1085-bp。我们的研究结果引入了来自六个主要支系(原枝目、翼手目、古翼手目、古翼手目、无尾目和无尾目)的新方案,但一些内部节点的解析度较低,如一些拓扑结构中的旁支系异齿目(Heterodonta),这可能是由于分类群取样不足造成的。在分析翼手目和翼手目的特定矩阵时,分辨率有所提高。我们发现了三种不同于以前发表的翼手目拓扑结构,其中((Ostreida + (Arcida + Mytilida)) + (Pectinida + (Limida + Pectinida))支持度最高。)Limida 嵌套在 Pectinida 中,值得进一步研究。对于无尾目(Imparidentia),我们的结果有力地支持了(Galeommatida + (Adapedonta + Cardiida))的新假说,而推断出了 Lucinida 的可能非单系,但支持度不高。总之,我们的研究结果为双壳纲的系统发育提供了重要的见解,并表明 UCEs 的目标富集测序可广泛应用于研究深层和浅层的系统发育关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Systematic Biology
Systematic Biology 生物-进化生物学
CiteScore
13.00
自引率
7.70%
发文量
70
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Systematic Biology is the bimonthly journal of the Society of Systematic Biologists. Papers for the journal are original contributions to the theory, principles, and methods of systematics as well as phylogeny, evolution, morphology, biogeography, paleontology, genetics, and the classification of all living things. A Points of View section offers a forum for discussion, while book reviews and announcements of general interest are also featured.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信