Accuracy of screw placement during vertebral body tethering using fluoroscopic guidance and anatomic landmarks.

IF 1.6 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Kevin M Neal, Kylie Krombholz, Mona Doshi
{"title":"Accuracy of screw placement during vertebral body tethering using fluoroscopic guidance and anatomic landmarks.","authors":"Kevin M Neal, Kylie Krombholz, Mona Doshi","doi":"10.1007/s43390-024-00970-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To determine the accuracy of screw placement using fluoroscopy and anatomic landmarks during vertebral body tethering (VBT) surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Ten patients with 73 VBT screws were converted to posterior spinal fusion (PSF) after continued curve progression. The positions of each VBT screw were analyzed using intraoperative computed tomography (CT) scans performed for image guidance during VBT. Differences for screws placed using an open versus thoracoscopic approach were noted for the screw position in each vertebra, distance from the spinal canal, unicortical versus bicortical placement, the distance of screw tips from the thoracic aorta, and impingement of screws on adjacent rib heads.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventy three (73) screws in ten (10) patients were available for analysis. Only 21% of screws were placed traversing the middle one-third of the vertebral body, without spinal canal penetration, with the distal tip placed unicortically or bicortically as planned, and without touching the thoracic aorta. The rates of non-ideal screw placement were not significantly different for screws placed via thoracoscopic versus open approaches. Five (5) screws (6.8%) penetrated the spinal canal 1-2 mm, but without known clinical sequelae.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The majority of VBT screws available for analysis were placed in non-ideal positions, suggesting that accurate screw placement using intraoperative fluoroscopy and anatomic landmarks can be challenging, but without adverse clinical consequences.</p>","PeriodicalId":21796,"journal":{"name":"Spine deformity","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spine deformity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43390-024-00970-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To determine the accuracy of screw placement using fluoroscopy and anatomic landmarks during vertebral body tethering (VBT) surgery.

Methods: Ten patients with 73 VBT screws were converted to posterior spinal fusion (PSF) after continued curve progression. The positions of each VBT screw were analyzed using intraoperative computed tomography (CT) scans performed for image guidance during VBT. Differences for screws placed using an open versus thoracoscopic approach were noted for the screw position in each vertebra, distance from the spinal canal, unicortical versus bicortical placement, the distance of screw tips from the thoracic aorta, and impingement of screws on adjacent rib heads.

Results: Seventy three (73) screws in ten (10) patients were available for analysis. Only 21% of screws were placed traversing the middle one-third of the vertebral body, without spinal canal penetration, with the distal tip placed unicortically or bicortically as planned, and without touching the thoracic aorta. The rates of non-ideal screw placement were not significantly different for screws placed via thoracoscopic versus open approaches. Five (5) screws (6.8%) penetrated the spinal canal 1-2 mm, but without known clinical sequelae.

Conclusion: The majority of VBT screws available for analysis were placed in non-ideal positions, suggesting that accurate screw placement using intraoperative fluoroscopy and anatomic landmarks can be challenging, but without adverse clinical consequences.

使用透视引导和解剖标志在椎体系带术中准确放置螺钉。
目的:确定在椎体拴系(VBT)手术中使用透视和解剖标志放置螺钉的准确性:方法:10 名患者共使用了 73 颗 VBT 螺钉,在脊柱曲线继续发展后转为后路脊柱融合术(PSF)。我们使用术中计算机断层扫描(CT)分析了每颗 VBT 螺钉的位置,CT 扫描用于 VBT 期间的图像引导。结果显示,采用开放式方法与胸腔镜方法放置的螺钉在每个椎体的位置、与椎管的距离、单皮质与双皮质放置、螺钉尖端与胸主动脉的距离以及螺钉与邻近肋骨头的撞击等方面存在差异:共有十(10)名患者的 73 颗螺钉可供分析。只有 21% 的螺钉穿过了椎体的中间三分之一,没有穿透椎管,远端按计划置于单皮质或双皮质,并且没有触及胸主动脉。通过胸腔镜和开放式方法放置螺钉的非理想螺钉放置率没有明显差异。五(5)枚螺钉(6.8%)穿透椎管 1-2 毫米,但没有已知的临床后遗症:结论:大多数可用于分析的 VBT 螺钉都放置在非理想位置,这表明使用术中透视和解剖标志准确放置螺钉具有挑战性,但不会产生不良临床后果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
18.80%
发文量
167
期刊介绍: Spine Deformity the official journal of the?Scoliosis Research Society is a peer-refereed publication to disseminate knowledge on basic science and clinical research into the?etiology?biomechanics?treatment?methods and outcomes of all types of?spinal deformities. The international members of the Editorial Board provide a worldwide perspective for the journal's area of interest.The?journal?will enhance the mission of the Society which is to foster the optimal care of all patients with?spine?deformities worldwide. Articles published in?Spine Deformity?are Medline indexed in PubMed.? The journal publishes original articles in the form of clinical and basic research. Spine Deformity will only publish studies that have institutional review board (IRB) or similar ethics committee approval for human and animal studies and have strictly observed these guidelines. The minimum follow-up period for follow-up clinical studies is 24 months.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信