Is general practitioner involvement in the initiation of opioids for chronic non-cancer pain associated with opioid dose and concurrent drug use?

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Trond Høibø, Svetlana Skurtveit, Torgeir Gilje Lid
{"title":"Is general practitioner involvement in the initiation of opioids for chronic non-cancer pain associated with opioid dose and concurrent drug use?","authors":"Trond Høibø, Svetlana Skurtveit, Torgeir Gilje Lid","doi":"10.1080/02813432.2024.2404053","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Objective</i> Is the involvement of the regular general practitioner (GP) in the decision to initiate opioid treatment for chronic non-cancer pain (CNCP) associated with two main risk factors for serious adverse events: increased opioid dose and the concomitant use of prescribed benzodiazepines or benzodiazepine-related medications? <i>Design and setting</i> An anonymous web-based survey was conducted in the county of Rogaland, Norway, during the spring of 2021. <i>Subjects</i> GPs who self-reported applying at least once for reimbursement of opioids prescribed to treat CNCP. They were asked to answer the survey based on the last patient for whom they recalled submitting a reimbursement application. <i>Main outcome measures</i> 1) Total opioid dose in daily oral morphine equivalents (OMEQ). 2) Concurrent use of benzodiazepines and/or benzodiazepine-related drugs. <i>Results</i> The daily opioid dose was lower when the surveyed GPs initiated the opioid treatment (36 OMEQ, <i>n</i> = 25), than when others had initiated the treatment (108 OMEQ, <i>n</i> = 31, <i>p</i> = 0.001). For concurrent use of benzodiazepine or benzodiazepine-related drugs, no significant difference was found (33%, <i>n</i> = 9 with GP involvement <i>vs</i>. 47%, <i>n</i> = 16, <i>p</i> = 0.279 with no GP involvement). <i>Conclusions</i> GP involvement in the initiation of opioid medication for CNCP was associated with a lower opioid dose being prescribed. <i>Implications</i> GP involvement in the initiation of opioid prescriptions may facilitate safer prescribing.</p>","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02813432.2024.2404053","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective Is the involvement of the regular general practitioner (GP) in the decision to initiate opioid treatment for chronic non-cancer pain (CNCP) associated with two main risk factors for serious adverse events: increased opioid dose and the concomitant use of prescribed benzodiazepines or benzodiazepine-related medications? Design and setting An anonymous web-based survey was conducted in the county of Rogaland, Norway, during the spring of 2021. Subjects GPs who self-reported applying at least once for reimbursement of opioids prescribed to treat CNCP. They were asked to answer the survey based on the last patient for whom they recalled submitting a reimbursement application. Main outcome measures 1) Total opioid dose in daily oral morphine equivalents (OMEQ). 2) Concurrent use of benzodiazepines and/or benzodiazepine-related drugs. Results The daily opioid dose was lower when the surveyed GPs initiated the opioid treatment (36 OMEQ, n = 25), than when others had initiated the treatment (108 OMEQ, n = 31, p = 0.001). For concurrent use of benzodiazepine or benzodiazepine-related drugs, no significant difference was found (33%, n = 9 with GP involvement vs. 47%, n = 16, p = 0.279 with no GP involvement). Conclusions GP involvement in the initiation of opioid medication for CNCP was associated with a lower opioid dose being prescribed. Implications GP involvement in the initiation of opioid prescriptions may facilitate safer prescribing.

全科医生是否参与了阿片类药物治疗慢性非癌症疼痛的启动工作?
目的 常规全科医生(GP)参与慢性非癌性疼痛(CNCP)阿片类药物治疗的决定是否与严重不良事件的两个主要风险因素有关:阿片类药物剂量增加和同时使用处方苯二氮卓类药物或苯二氮卓类药物相关药物?设计与环境 2021 年春季在挪威罗加兰郡进行了一项匿名网络调查。调查对象为自称至少申请过一次阿片类药物治疗 CNCP 报销的全科医生。要求他们根据回忆中最后一次提交报销申请的患者回答调查。主要结果指标 1)以每日口服吗啡当量(OMEQ)为单位的阿片类药物总剂量。2)同时使用苯二氮卓和/或苯二氮卓相关药物。结果 接受调查的全科医生开始阿片类药物治疗时的每日阿片类药物剂量(36 OMEQ,n = 25)低于其他全科医生开始治疗时的每日阿片类药物剂量(108 OMEQ,n = 31,p = 0.001)。至于同时使用苯二氮卓类药物或苯二氮卓类药物相关药物,则没有发现显著差异(有全科医生参与的为 33%,n = 9;无全科医生参与的为 47%,n = 16,p = 0.279)。结论 在开始使用阿片类药物治疗 CNCP 时,全科医生的参与与处方的阿片类药物剂量较低有关。全科医生参与阿片类药物处方的开具有助于提高处方的安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信